Hi Jim,
I have read through several of the threads with Steve Goddard on his and your blogs and on Twitter. Please believe me (as someone who accepts the concepts of global warming and the very real dangers we face) that I severely doubt this is achieving anything. In fact, if anything it most probably has negative impact on the cause. As somebody who has above average knowledge of the cryosphere I am sometimes lost on what you and Steve Goddard are disagreeing about. To a curious reader it must just seem like two opposing views slinging mud at each other hoping some will stick. The twitter exchanges are particularly so lacking in context and hard data that the discussion is not moved on by each new tweet. Of course you are free to do whatever you think is best and what suits you most at this moment int time. But I have to conclude that this is only likely to help the "other side" because all they have to do is confuse the situation and maintain the status quo in order to succeed.
Maybe there are other ways to show the opposing position up for the untenable position it is. For example, do the 'other side' agree that the 2014 arctic temperature record is correct? Goddard has posted a blog crowing about the below average temperature in summer 2014 so presumably they do. How about asking them to integrate that temperature record over both winter and summer and seeing how far above average temperature the value is. The same values could then be presented for 2013, 2012 etc. and ask the 'other side' to explain how this could occur if the world is not warming.