Yeah, the last ones on both of your last frames. In the first case, it shows a scientist essentially manipulating data (holding a lighter under a thermometer to make it hotter) and watching to see when he can push an alarm bell (to be an alarmist).
Perhaps that is supposed to be some deep kind of satire, but if so I think it is running up against a version of Poe's law.
The last one suggests that scientists have an appliance on their computers that asks them how they want to manipulate charts this time.
So both portray climate scientists as completely and cynically willing to lie and to manipulate their data to get the results they 'want.' (There is of course a larger irony here, since that is exactly what denialists have been caught doing time and time again.)
If someone else has some other interpretation of these, I'd be happy to hear them, though.