So Svalbard has had and has record warmth while in Southern Spain they were building igloos. Is this not why climate scientists now say "Climate Change" instead of global warming ?
Indeed, do not these events add to the accumulation of data that supports the hypothesis of a significant structural change in the climate of much of the Northern hemisphere ?
this is a good example, no offend meant, how one can take an information out of context and draw a picture that has little to do with the situation in general. why am i saying this:
a) temperatures in southern spain were quite average throughout the entire winter
b) i measure now 12.3C on my terrasse at 17:44 which is a bit far from "igloo" temps
c) the amount or of rain as well was quite average, at least no extremes
d) it was between 17 and 22C for the last 2 months and only for exactly 3-4 days temps will be between 14 and 16C that's by no means extraordinary and so short that one cannot provide the information in a way like this would be the new climate in southern spain.
if anyone who is a sceptic or even a denier will read this kind of comment he will feel confirmed in this opinion that climate change is made up by using events and information in a way that it's convenient for what someone wants to say.
while temps in the arctic are indeed way above average, southern spain is not a good mid latitude example for that because tempss were always slightly above, slightly below or spot on average like most of the time.