Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog

Author Topic: Coal  (Read 586222 times)

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #350 on: December 13, 2014, 07:59:17 PM »
I count eight reasons for coal industry trouble in the first paragraphs of this article, "How the 'War on Coal' went global."
Then this:
Quote
The upshot: Coal exports, which more than doubled from 2007 to 2012, are expected to fall by nearly one-fifth this year, the U.S. Energy Information Administration says. In 2015, the number of tons exported could hit its lowest level in five years.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/war-coal-epa-pollution-113550.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Laurent

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 50
Re: Coal
« Reply #351 on: December 15, 2014, 08:39:26 PM »

wili

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3342
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 602
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: Coal
« Reply #352 on: December 16, 2014, 03:05:43 AM »
Quote
Global coal use is on an upwards march despite calls to halt fossil fuels demand at a UN climate summit in Peru and will hit a record 9bn tonnes by 2019, according to the International Energy Agency.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/dec/15/coal-demand-set-to-break-9bn-tonne-barrier-this-decade
"A force de chercher de bonnes raisons, on en trouve; on les dit; et après on y tient, non pas tant parce qu'elles sont bonnes que pour ne pas se démentir." Choderlos de Laclos "You struggle to come up with some valid reasons, then cling to them, not because they're good, but just to not back down."

Bob Wallace

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3855
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Coal
« Reply #353 on: December 16, 2014, 04:15:42 AM »
Quote
Global coal use is on an upwards march despite calls to halt fossil fuels demand at a UN climate summit in Peru and will hit a record 9bn tonnes by 2019, according to the International Energy Agency.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/dec/15/coal-demand-set-to-break-9bn-tonne-barrier-this-decade

Will it?  Let's look at how consumption growth as been since 2000...



http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html

There's a clear drop in growth rate from the 2003-2004 point.  And the last three years are showing declining growth.

If we look at the top coal consumers, China is working hit peak coal.  The US is in the process of closing 25% of its capacity.  Germany is now at it's second lowest consumption rate in modern history and heading lower.  India is making noise about cutting coal use.  Japan is unlikely to increase as they are working to get more wind and solar in place.

I wouldn't bet with the IEA.

Bob Wallace

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3855
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Coal
« Reply #354 on: December 16, 2014, 04:55:18 AM »

July 11, 2014

Quote
The newly elected India government of Narendra Modi has announced a suite of initiatives for solar energy across the country that will be partly funded by a doubling of the tax on coal.

Modi – a long time supporter of solar – has promised a “saffron” revolution that will include ambitious targets for small, large and off-grid solar and a switch away from an assumed reliance on coal as the country seeks to deliver on its momentous task of bringing electricity to the entire country.

In its first budget announced this week, Modi’s government announced funding for a series of “ultra mega” solar PV farms to be located in four Indian deserts, in Rajasthan,  Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh and Jammu & Kashmir.

The government also launched a scheme for 100,000 solar power driven agricultural pump sets and water pumping stations in off grid areas.

It has also announced plans to dramatically extend a plan to cover canals with a series of 1MW solar farms, using availabl space to generate electricity and to reduce evaporation.

And it has also announced tax cuts and excise exemptions for arrange of solar components and machinery to help reduce the cost of domestic manufacturing of solar PV cells and modules.


http://reneweconomy.com.au/2014/modi-accelerates-india-solar-revolution-doubles-tax-on-coal-57890

wili

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3342
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 602
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: Coal
« Reply #355 on: December 16, 2014, 03:32:34 PM »
Over the last decade, from 2000 to 2010, coal use has grown more strongly than any other primary energy source (+ 28%).

http://www.euracoal.be/pages/layout1sp.php?idpage=427

Even growth at about 2% per year gets us to about 9 billion tonnes by the end of the decade.

But yeah, let's hope China really does put on the breaks on coal use and that India's growth in electricity use comes mostly from solar and wind.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2014, 04:44:14 PM by wili »
"A force de chercher de bonnes raisons, on en trouve; on les dit; et après on y tient, non pas tant parce qu'elles sont bonnes que pour ne pas se démentir." Choderlos de Laclos "You struggle to come up with some valid reasons, then cling to them, not because they're good, but just to not back down."

Bob Wallace

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3855
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Coal
« Reply #356 on: December 16, 2014, 07:46:43 PM »
What coal did between 2000 and 2010 tells us nothing about what coal will do between 2015 and 2025.

Bob Wallace

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3855
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Coal
« Reply #357 on: December 16, 2014, 08:59:17 PM »
Quote
Global coal demand growth will slow in the five years through 2019 as China, the world’s biggest consumer of the fuel, takes steps to cut energy intensity and diversify supply, according to the International Energy Agency.

Coal use will increase by 2.1 percent a year through 2019 to 6.5 billion metric tons of coal equivalent, less than the 2.3 percent growth predicted last year for the five years through 2018, the Paris-based agency said in its Medium-Term Coal Market Report.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-15/coal-demand-growth-to-slow-in-next-five-years-on-china-iea-says.html

I imagine if we were to go back 2-4 years and look at the IEA predictions for coal they would be higher than the 2.3% growth predicted a year ago that has now been rolled back to 2.1%.

And I'd bet (were I a betting person) than that 2.1% number will shrink going forward.  I really think that people making these sorts of predictions fail to understand the economics of renewables and the growing social pressures to move away from fossil fuels.


Bob Wallace

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3855
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Coal
« Reply #358 on: December 16, 2014, 09:07:47 PM »
In 2012 -

IEA - coal consumption will rise 2013 to 2019 at 2.6% per year.

Then, the year before -

"A report released recently by the International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that under current polices, primary world energy demand will grow 51% between 2009 and 2035, with global demand for coal increasing by as much as 65%."

http://im-mining.com/2011/11/24/iea-2011-report-predicts-surge-in-global-coal-use/

wili

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3342
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 602
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: Coal
« Reply #359 on: December 16, 2014, 09:27:19 PM »
"What coal did between 2000 and 2010 tells us nothing about what coal will do between 2015 and 2025."

Then why did you include a graph that covers roughly those years?

Quote
In 2012 - IEA - coal consumption will rise 2013 to 2019 at 2.6% per year.
Then, the year before -
"A report released recently by the International Energy Agency (IEA) predicts that under current polices, primary world energy demand will grow 51% between 2009 and 2035, with global demand for coal increasing by as much as 65%."

Is there a point in there somewhere?

"And I'd bet (were I a betting person) than that 2.1% number will shrink going forward.  I really think that people making these sorts of predictions fail to understand the economics of renewables and the growing social pressures to move away from fossil fuels."

I hope so. But as you point out above, making predictions from a few years of data is not particularly probative, either way.

"A force de chercher de bonnes raisons, on en trouve; on les dit; et après on y tient, non pas tant parce qu'elles sont bonnes que pour ne pas se démentir." Choderlos de Laclos "You struggle to come up with some valid reasons, then cling to them, not because they're good, but just to not back down."

Bob Wallace

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3855
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Coal
« Reply #360 on: December 16, 2014, 11:29:00 PM »
"Then why did you include a graph that covers roughly those years?"

Because they show us what has happened over time.  History, in this case is not necessarily a good predictor.  Do you understand the difference?


"Is there a point in there somewhere?"

Yes, as the years go by, the IEA has been lowering its growth rate predictions.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #361 on: December 17, 2014, 11:41:33 PM »
India's Prime Minister wants to privatize the national coal industry, to increase efficiency and reduce blackouts.  Coal miners say they will strike.
Quote
Last week, Modi made a move toward ending shortages, winning partial passage of a bill that will allow him to end a 40-year government coal monopoly. The plan is to bring in more efficient private companies. The coal unions say that will mean job losses, and that they will fight the legislation.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-16/india-s-modi-gets-his-maggie-thatcher-moment-with-coal-unions.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Bob Wallace

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3855
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Coal
« Reply #362 on: December 17, 2014, 11:57:01 PM »
Privatizing the coal industry would make it easier to kill off?

 

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #363 on: December 21, 2014, 03:11:16 AM »
Good news, or bad?
U.S. trains filled with oil and grain are preventing coal from getting to power plants -- which are using more natural gas to save their dwinding coal stocks -- causing power prices to rise.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-17/cheap-oil-jamming-rails-means-higher-u-s-power-bills.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Bob Wallace

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3855
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 41
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Coal
« Reply #364 on: December 21, 2014, 04:16:52 AM »
Basically good news for renewables if crowded rails are causing price increases for oil and coal.  Not good for consumers in the short run.  Neither is the resulting price in grain.

BTW, PBO is starting to make noises that sound like the Keystone pipeline is not going to be approved....

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #365 on: December 27, 2014, 04:44:39 PM »
Mild temperatures, recently and forecast, in the US cause natural gas futures to sink to levels not seen since 2012 -- competitive with coal.  A surplus is building, and high futures contracts are caving.
Quote
Low gas prices are “eventually going to provide some sort of floor” by prompting power generators to switch from burning coal, said Calder. “This withdrawal shows that it’s going to be a while coming. In the meantime, we are going to see bears take over this market.”
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-26/natural-gas-futures-drop-below-3-for-first-time-since-2012.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

JimD

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 2272
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 6
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Coal
« Reply #366 on: January 08, 2015, 04:54:11 PM »
Yet another reason to hate coal.

Coal Companies Are Selling Coal To Themselves To Get More Government Subsidies

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/01/07/3609210/coal-companies-selling-to-themselves/

Quote
In what is being described as a fundamental shift in how the coal industry does business, over 40 percent of all coal produced in Wyoming is now being first sold not to a power plant or a utility, but to a subsidiary of the same company that mined the coal — a 17-fold increase since 2004 for the U.S.’s largest coal-producing state.

According to a new report by the Center for American Progress, these inside deals between coal companies and their own subsidiaries (known as “captive transactions”) are aimed, in part, at intentionally dodging federal and state royalty payments and maximizing taxpayer-funded subsidies from the U.S. Department of the Interior....
We do not err because truth is difficult to see. It is visible at a glance. We err because this is more comfortable. Alexander Solzhenitsyn

How is it conceivable that all our technological progress - our very civilization - is like the axe in the hand of the pathological criminal? Albert Einstein

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #367 on: January 14, 2015, 04:24:58 AM »
2014:  One after the other, coal export terminal projects in the U.S. were defeated.
Quote
The U.S. coal export industry continued its losing streak as 2014 ended and 2015 began. A coal terminal project in Louisiana lost its permit in state court, and one in Washington ran into a stiff legal challenge. Last month, the company behind several other planned terminals sold its remaining projects to a high-risk investment firm at a major loss.

The developments continue a string of victories for environment groups fighting the export of coal to developing economies such as China. Of 15 proposals to build major new coal export facilities across the U.S., all but four have been defeated or canceled within the past two years. And only a few existing facilities have won approval to expand.
http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20150112/losing-streak-continues-us-coal-export-terminals
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #368 on: January 15, 2015, 09:51:32 PM »
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Laurent

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 50
Re: Coal
« Reply #369 on: January 22, 2015, 10:16:33 PM »

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #370 on: February 04, 2015, 02:12:46 PM »
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Laurent

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 50
Re: Coal
« Reply #371 on: February 06, 2015, 10:00:08 AM »

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #372 on: February 07, 2015, 04:04:40 AM »
350.org calls for moratorium on Australia's Abbot Point coal port expansion in light of “Adani-gate” findings
Quote
“According to India’s own energy minister, the country is likely to stop importing coal within two years,” Palese said. “We have to ask what happens to these mega coal mines and ports as coal demand drops and renewables’ competitiveness rises. It is completely unconscionable to dredge the Reef and destroy our climate for a massive new coal project that may well end up as a stranded asset.”
http://350.org.au/blog/350-org-calls-for-moratorium-on-abbot-point-coal-port-expansion-in-light-of-adani-gate-findings/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #373 on: February 07, 2015, 04:41:20 PM »
The coal industry is following oil's example: desperately maximizing production as prices plummet.  Don't expect this to continue for long.

Quote
Coal prices in the United States have reached a six-year low and could fall further in 2015. The situation is little better internationally, where Australian coal prices fell more than 8% between July and December 2014 and European coal prices fell by nearly 4.4% in the same period. Forecasts for 2015 indicate Australian coal could lose nearly 9% more and European coal could drop as much as 25%.

There are two reasons for fix that the industry finds itself in today: lower demand from China and a stronger U.S. dollar. China imposed restrictions on coal imports last year and foreign supplies fell by 11%. Demand from the Middle Kingdom is expected to slide another 9% in 2015.

The stronger dollar helps producers from Russia to South Africa to Australia. Russia, where the ruble has sunk to the bottom of Lake Baikal, is expected produce as much coal as it can this year in an effort to drive higher-priced producers out of the market. Australia will adopt a similar policy. If it sounds familiar, that’s because it is essentially the same strategy that Saudi Arabia has adopted and forced on its fellow OPEC members to maintain oil market share as crude prices drop.
...
The lift some U.S. producers got from exports to China is disappearing and exports to other countries are hurt by the strength of the dollar. In domestic sales, coal prices are being challenged by continuing low prices for natural gas and increasing requirements for emissions reductions at coal-fired electricity generating plants.

http://247wallst.com/commodities-metals/2015/02/06/can-coal-make-a-comeback/#ixzz3R4Ud87JB


Like this:
TVA announces replacement of 55-year-old Memphis, Tennessee -- a heart of coal country state! -- generating plant (3 coal-fired units) with 2 high-efficiency gas turbine generators.

http://www.pennenergy.com/articles/pennenergy/2015/01/ge-to-replace-tva-s-coal-units-with-cleaner-high-efficiency-gas-power-turbines.html


(I've addressed the "yes, but it's still carbon" argument earlier today here , so I'll not repeat it now.  U.S. CO2 emissions growth is slowing.   Which is good.  :) )
« Last Edit: February 07, 2015, 05:18:34 PM by Sigmetnow »
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Laurent

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 50
Re: Coal
« Reply #374 on: February 19, 2015, 09:26:49 AM »

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #375 on: February 23, 2015, 08:20:05 PM »
Quote
Duke Energy is facing multiple criminal charges for years of dumping coal waste into North Carolina’s rivers.

Federal prosecutors charged Duke with nine counts of misdemeanors under the Clean Water Act late Friday, saying that the energy company had been dumping coal ash from power plants in five North Carolina locations since at least 2010. Duke isn’t challenging the case — instead, it has already worked out a proposed plea bargain with the federal government. If approved, the bargain would require the company to pay a total of $102.2 million — $68.2 million in fines and restitution and $34 million for community service and projects to help mitigate the effects of the pollution.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/02/23/3625717/duke-energy-coal-ash-charges/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #376 on: February 23, 2015, 08:27:53 PM »
Quote
The German capital of Berlin will shut its four remaining coal-fired power plants by 2020, according to provisional results from a parliamentary inquiry committee on the city’s future energy supply, Die Welt reports.
http://www.cleanenergywire.org/news/media-city-berlin-exit-coal-2020
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

wili

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3342
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 602
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: Coal
« Reply #377 on: February 27, 2015, 04:14:12 AM »
WSJ and now a few other sources are claiming that China's total coal consumption actually fell last year (didn't just grow at a slower rate) by 2.9%.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/02/26/3627490/china-coal-peak/

If confirmed, this is potentially pretty big news, especially if its a result of policy and not just slowdown or some random temporary set of coincidences.

I guess Bob Wallace is traveling probably be all over this with plenty of gloat and 'I told ya so'!  ;D

CarbonBrief claims that their total CO2 emissions may have fallen, too (last graph), though this is preliminary. http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2015/02/official-data-confirms-chinese-coal-use-fell-in-2014/
"A force de chercher de bonnes raisons, on en trouve; on les dit; et après on y tient, non pas tant parce qu'elles sont bonnes que pour ne pas se démentir." Choderlos de Laclos "You struggle to come up with some valid reasons, then cling to them, not because they're good, but just to not back down."

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #378 on: February 27, 2015, 05:47:31 PM »
WSJ and now a few other sources are claiming that China's total coal consumption actually fell last year (didn't just grow at a slower rate) by 2.9%.
This is indeed great news.  Even if China fudged the numbers a bit to pacify everyone (after all, they insisted on calling their choking air "fog" instead of "smog" for years) -- it verifies they are now clued in about the importance of the carbon face they show the world.  Not insisting they must still grow at any cost.


Besides, we are ramping up satellite measurements of CO2 emissions.  Soon no one will be able to hide the truth.
http://t.space.com/all/26403-nasa-oco2-carbon-dioxide-satellite-launch#1

And as to China's added coal capacity in 2014, the CarbonBrief article has this:
Quote
Chinese coal plants have been running fewer hours, however, suggesting capacity is being added but not used. Coal overcapacity will lead to losses for all coal plant and will, ultimately, mean closure for older stations, according to Greenpeace.
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

wili

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 3342
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 602
  • Likes Given: 409
Re: Coal
« Reply #379 on: February 27, 2015, 06:02:50 PM »
I suppose some of that added capacity may be newer plants that don't create as many (noon-CO2) pollutants specifically so that they can retire some of the older, dirtier plants. So perhaps shouldn't be seen as adding net capacity in the long run.
"A force de chercher de bonnes raisons, on en trouve; on les dit; et après on y tient, non pas tant parce qu'elles sont bonnes que pour ne pas se démentir." Choderlos de Laclos "You struggle to come up with some valid reasons, then cling to them, not because they're good, but just to not back down."

AbruptSLR

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 19703
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2268
  • Likes Given: 286
Re: Coal
« Reply #380 on: February 27, 2015, 06:16:05 PM »
The linked article discusses the complications associated with the US EPA's efforts to promote the use of CCS to develop "clean coal" in the USA:

http://www.bna.com/mccarthy-defends-viability-n17179923414/
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #381 on: February 27, 2015, 09:22:57 PM »
The linked article discusses the complications associated with the US EPA's efforts to promote the use of CCS to develop "clean coal" in the USA:

http://www.bna.com/mccarthy-defends-viability-n17179923414/

From the article:
Quote
Dropping the carbon capture component of the proposed rule could help insulate the final rule from some legal challenges....

I’m quite confident they’re looking seriously at whether they’re going forward with CCS and whether they want to take on vulnerability,” Holmstead said.

Does anyone see CCS as anything more than a political dodge, used only so the EPA can say they are not banning coal?  With the evidence so lacking that CCS will work, doesn't it effectively mean coal is ruled out?
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #382 on: March 02, 2015, 09:43:44 PM »
Support growing for a quick phase-out of coal in the UK.
Quote
A YouGov survey for Greenpeace shows that the majority of people (56%) support the phasing out of coal fired power stations in the early 2020s as part of efforts to cut carbon emissions, more than double the proportion (24%) who oppose such a move.
...
The Government's climate advisers have said there is no role for conventional coal power generation beyond the early 2020s if the UK is to meet its long term goals to cut emissions in the most cost-effective way.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-2974997/Plans-phase-coal-power-urged.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Csnavywx

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 572
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 82
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Coal
« Reply #383 on: March 03, 2015, 12:24:21 AM »
A couple of points on the China drop:

The solid drop, if confirmed, is indeed good news. It shows that, at the very least, the Chinese are taking the air pollution problem seriously. Since relocation of coal-fired power generation away from the major population centers will naturally include some supplanting with lower/no carbon generation and higher-efficiency plants, it represents at least a temporary reprieve from the massive increases in CO2 emissions of the last decade.

The impact of weather on cooling and heating needs was substantially less in 2014 than in the previous year (and likely less than average). This had a strong net negative effect on power demand, and thus coal (since most generation is still coal-fired at this point). Also, hydropower had a very good year, with the surpluses helping supplant fossil generation.

Some coal is being diverted to CTG and CTL and this is expected to increase, despite lower oil prices, since coal prices have dropped precipitously in tow.


So, to recap, there's likely a bit more going on than meets the eye:

1) Longer-term downward pressure due to air pollution.
2) Re-location of generation leading to higher efficiency plants and some substitution.
3) Strong decrease in heating and cooling degree days over the previous few years.
4) Strong hydropower year (related to weather and new construction).
5) CTL and CTG projects will exert upward pressure on emissions over the longer term.


Points 3 and 4 are temporary and will turn around. Points 1 and 2 will likely keep the pressure on, at least until the pollution problem starts to abate. Point 5 will unfortunately offset some of the gains made.

We really need more than one data year point to declare victory. It's a bit early to be uncorking the champagne on this one yet.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #384 on: March 03, 2015, 02:25:20 AM »
NYT says Rio Tinto, the world's second-largest mining company, may be exiting coal business entirely.
Quote
In its latest effort to slash costs as commodity prices fall, Rio Tinto is letting go its energy chief and rolling its coal and uranium businesses into two other units, a move that could signal its intention to divest its coal assets.
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2015/02/27/business/27reuters-rio-tinto-costs.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #385 on: March 04, 2015, 02:15:58 AM »
Modi Commits to Clean Environment by Doubling India’s Coal Tax.
( and promoting electric vehicles and renewable-energy projects )
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-28/modi-commits-to-clean-environment-by-doubling-india-s-coal-tax
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #386 on: March 12, 2015, 07:00:37 PM »
Florida Utility Company To Buy Coal Plant Just To Shut It Down.
Quote
The reason it’s doing this, FPL has said, is simple: the plant is outdated, and shutting it down will save customers money — $70 million a year to be exact, according to the utility.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/03/12/3632518/florida-coal-plant-shutdown/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #387 on: March 17, 2015, 04:41:17 PM »
Proposed coal plants are being cancelled all over the world.
Quote
The global coal boom has started to slow, a new  report says, as more plans for new power plants are now being shelved than completed.

The number of cancelled coal projects across the world has outstripped those completed at a rate of two to one since 2010, according to Sierra Club and CoalSwarm - two campaign groups that have tracked the progress of 3,900 intended plants since 1 January 2010.
...
The highest proportion of coal projects were canned in Europe, where the failure rate was 7:1.

The lowest was in east Asia, where only one project failed for every success. And the majority of these were in China, where around 228 gigawatts were added between 2010 and 2014, compared to 119 gigawatts cancelled.

However, in terms of tonnes of carbon dioxide avoided, the cancellations in east Asia were more than double that of Europe, due to the sheer scale of projects being proposed in the first place.

In India, the story is of a particularly rapid slowdown in the rate at which proposed coal plants are being constructed.

From the beginning of 2010 to mid-2012, the ratio of plants halted to plants completed was nearly 2:1. From mid-2012 to mid-2014, this increased to more than 6:1. The report puts this down to a variety of factors, among them the  "Coalgate" scandal concerning the corrupt allocation of coal mining rights between 2004-9.
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2015/03/more-coal-plants-are-being-cancelled-than-built/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #388 on: March 25, 2015, 01:54:08 AM »
US coal crash serves as a warning to investors betting on carbon
Quote
“We’ve known for decades that coal posed serious health and environmental risks, but now coal has also become an investment risk as countries take serious actions to clear their air and protect the climate,” said Andrew Logan, director of the oil and gas program at Ceres, a non-profit sustainability organization.

“Investors have been pushing for coal and other fossil fuel companies to face facts and adapt their business models to thrive in a carbon-constrained world.”

The financial think-tank says the fate of US coal should serve as a warning to investors in other fossil fuel markets worldwide who fail to prudently read a structural shift away from hydrocarbons and blindly continue to invest in assets that are in increasingly in danger of becoming stranded. Earlier this month the International Energy Agency said that for the first time in 40 years CO2 emissions had stalled in 2014, a development that was not tied to a downturn in economic growth. It attributed the fall to changing patterns of energy consumption in China and OECD countries with the use of renewables and greater energy efficiency measures cited as contributing factors.

“The roof has fallen in on U.S. coal, and alarm bells should be ringing for investors in related sectors around the world,” said Andrew Grant, Carbon Tracker’s financial analyst and report co-author. “These first tremors are amongst the clearest signs yet of a seismic shift in energy markets, as high carbon fuels are set to be increasingly outperformed by lower carbon alternatives.
...
The industry’s plan B, to export production to assumed perennial growth markets in Asia, has also floundered amid a global market awash with supply from other countries and weak demand; Chinese coal consumption fell nearly 3% in 2014 while India, the world’s third largest buyer, says it may stop imports of thermal coal in the next three years With domestic markets collapsing and no lifeline from abroad, 264 US mines were closed between 2011 and 2013.
http://www.carbontracker.org/in-the-media/us-coal-crash-serves-as-a-warning-to-investors-betting-on-carbon/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

anotheramethyst

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 141
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 0
  • Likes Given: 2
Re: Coal
« Reply #389 on: March 25, 2015, 05:14:54 AM »
wow thats awesome!!! thats a lot of good news on one page :D

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #390 on: March 25, 2015, 08:10:13 PM »
Quote
The US coal sector is in a “structural decline” which has sent 26 companies bust in the last three years, according to financial analysts.

A report by the Carbon Tracker Initiative found that in the past five years the US coal industry lost 76% of its value. At least 264 mines were closed between 2011 and 2013. The world’s largest private coal company, Peabody Energy, lost 80% of its share price.

These declines were in spite of the Dow Jones industrial average increasing by 69% during the same period. Authors said this indicated a decoupling of US economic growth from coal.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/mar/24/us-coal-sector-in-terminal-decline-financial-analysts-say
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

AbruptSLR

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 19703
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2268
  • Likes Given: 286
Re: Coal
« Reply #391 on: March 25, 2015, 08:34:33 PM »
The linked article indicates that the implementation of mercury emission limits on coal-fired power plants will make the economics of keeping such polluting plants open:

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ed-mercury-20150324-story.html

Edit: Also, the linked article indicates that the coal industry will argue against putting limits on mercury on coal emissions before the US Supreme Court:

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/03/25/3638157/supreme-court-mercury-rule-preview/
« Last Edit: March 25, 2015, 08:42:57 PM by AbruptSLR »
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

werther

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 747
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 31
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Coal
« Reply #392 on: March 31, 2015, 10:37:14 AM »
In the search for large coal pits, here’s another one near Talcher, Orissa, India:



It measures about 10 x 6 km2. From GE, of course.

Associated to this, I read (oil-price) that, although coal-consumption seems to decrease in several countries, it doesn’t in India (at least, based on imports):


( PIB of India / Oilprice.com – D.Forest)

It will make the burden a lot heavier if a basis for international cooperation to meaningfully reduce  coal-consumption isn’t found.

sidd

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6783
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1047
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Coal
« Reply #393 on: March 31, 2015, 08:23:24 PM »
I guess the bankers for coal haven't yet got enuf free money from the Fed to make it possible to eat the loss they will take ...

"It’s partly the result of a 1977 law that requires companies to reclaim closed mine sites. That includes restoring grasslands, removing waste water and sealing the mine shafts.

So while a 4 million-ton-a-year mine in Central Appalachia, which has the nation’s highest coal costs, may lose $15 on every ton, the one-time expense to permanently close it could reach as much as $44 million, according to Wood Mackenzie Ltd.

No Relief

Alpha Natural Resources Inc., the second-biggest U.S. coal producer by sales, told investors Feb. 26 that it had $640.5 million in liabilities associated with closing the mines. That’s almost three times as much as the company is worth.

For Arch Coal Inc., which hasn’t made a profit since 2011, the figure is $418 million as of Dec. 31. "

Readallaboutit:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/appalachia-miners-wiped-coal-glut-041524050.html

P.S. Reclamation is a joke. The hills leak toxics into streams for ever, requiring water treatment for ever. Treatment that is not being done, and costs rarely included in reclamation estimates. The brooks and rills coming outta the huge tailing piles in Shamokin are dead, dead, dead, and flow directly into the Susquehenna.

werther

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 747
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 31
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Coal
« Reply #394 on: March 31, 2015, 11:36:48 PM »
Evening Sidd,

I had a look over there on GE. I suppose you live out there. What you describe fits with the continuous scarring all the way along one of these Appalachian ridges. Some 60 km. Things in the USA sure have been done thoroughly! At least, from the vantage point of profit. I guess active mining is mostly over, but the externalised cost on the ecology will linger. I'm sorry, because the valleys close to the ridge look like beautiful countryside.

sidd

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6783
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1047
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Coal
« Reply #395 on: April 01, 2015, 03:14:05 AM »
i dont live in Shamokin, but i wander central and eastern PA a lot. Some beautiful country, as you saw, not all the places were mined. The two or three valleys south of Shamokin were never mined (no coal) but the next three were, and one mine there is still active.


Laurent

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 2546
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 13
  • Likes Given: 50
Re: Coal
« Reply #396 on: April 01, 2015, 09:48:34 PM »

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #397 on: April 04, 2015, 02:14:52 AM »
Quote
Duke Energy has agreed to a $2.5 million settlement with Virginia over a massive coal ash spill that coated 70 miles of the Dan River in gray sludge, state environmental officials announced Friday.

The settlement drew immediate criticism from a water protection group, while the hardest-hit locality — the city of Danville — continues to negotiate with Duke.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/74d1040846bf45e6b28baa82a302d352/duke-virginia-agree-25-million-coal-ash-settlement
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #398 on: April 08, 2015, 09:14:02 PM »
Michael Bloomberg gives another $30 million to Sierra Club's Anti-Coal Campaign
The former New York City mayor gave $50 million in 2011.
Quote
The Sierra Club announced a new goal alongside the funding: Close half the nation's coal-fired power fleet by 2025. The group is seeking to secure commitments for those coal-plant retirements by the end of 2017.

That replaces the "Beyond Coal" campaign's prior goal of shutting down one-third of the nation's coal-fired power generation by 2020.


One sign of progress:

By the end of May, American Electric Power will shut down seven coal-fired power plants.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/business/2015/04/07/two-coal-plants-in-ohio-part-of-closings.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25902
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1159
  • Likes Given: 430
Re: Coal
« Reply #399 on: April 08, 2015, 09:56:40 PM »
Quote
Barclays has ended its financing of a controversial coal mining method known as mountaintop removal and said time is running out for the practice
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/apr/07/barclays-ends-financing-of-controversial-mountaintop-removal-mining
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.