Condescending? No. Just tired of reading random flotsam and jetsam with no bearing on data, reality, or basis in sound theory.
How deep do you want to dig? Here is the post which prompted you to opine that I should "get real" for suggesting that climate models ought to be able to predict the weather, in it's entirety:
"On a related note, IIRC there was a paper a year or two ago pointing out that thunderstorms, previously unheard of in the arctic, have started occurring and are now growing in frequency as far North as the CAA and Alaska/Beaufort. AFAIK the climate models weren't predicting that. So perhaps even more catching up to be done?"
Did I say, as you seem to think, that the models should have predicted the actual storms? No. I didn't. I posed a question as to whether they had predicted that storms would occur and increase in frequency. You just read it wrong, which is likely to happen if you start from the assumption that other people are stupid.