Our preconceptions of what kind of language and bias certain groups use to report/discuss climate change is important to how our subconscious absorbs or reacts against the information conveyed. The BBC were suffocating news about the super fast melting in July 2015 by reporting on the melt season 2 years prior, but was it intentional or unintentional? What they wrote was factually correct but given its timing and how highly regarded they are, I feel they lied while telling the truth; having a much more negative effective on helping their readership understand how deep in the poo we may be than when Monckton and co. speak.
I will read/listen to a BBC article if it comes my way, like yours did, but am more careful and analytical of what they write and don't proactively visit their website.
Personally, I don't question if climate change is happening. I question speed, effects, extinction. I pray I can find the right language to help my loved ones understand and act "before it is too late". I need to believe the correct language is not "before it was too late".