All these common myths are so often debunked.
PRATT.
Point Refuted a Thousand Times.
Tom 2/3 of the globe is water.
Overwhelmingly the greatest adjustment to the raw data is found in the ocean temperatures .
The early measurements for temperatures over the ocean have been adjusted up reducing global warming .
Before the II world war most measurements were taken from a canvas bucket lowered over the side of the boat. Evaporation will cause the contents of a wet canvas bucket to cool. Since about 1940 sea water temperatures are taken direct from the raw water intake on boats giving a more accurate reading that is on average warmer. The major adjustment to the global temperature data of about 0.2C upwards before 1940 is for this very simple reason that most 12 year old's can grasp.
If the scientists were corrupt as the wacko's propose why would they actually reduce warming with their adjustments?
I highly recommend referencing skeptical science if you want to refute any nonsense.
They have all the pratt's covered in depth with graphics and video explanations.
You will not convince the rusted on whacko's.
You can however influence those bystanders who are not so blinded by ideology and give them a good resource to continue to expand their understanding .
You will have to excuse my upmost contempt for those in denial.
I spent a decade debating with the denial nutbars on line. In that time I ended up totally reevaluating my political standpoint . I was once firmly in the free market neoliberal camp I would now be considered left wing.
To many of the right's talking points come from the same sources as climate change denial to be trusted.
They are not your friends.