On first glance the thickness looks similar to the Ice Sat map.
Sea ice thickness for Operation IceBridge seems to be thicker in most cases than for CryoSat. Perhaps pressure ridges are observed more accurately by OIB than by CryoSat?
There was an OIB flight over the western Beaufort Sea on 21 April 2016, with flight map shown
here (called the "SIZRS zigzag"). FWIW I just plotted a histogram of the sea ice thickness quick look data for this flight: see the image below. There are about twelve thousand valid sea ice thickness data points for this flight. Their median value is 2.37 meters, but the distribution has a fat tail of higher thicknesses, which should correspond to ridged/deformed ice:

(For the cumulative distribution function of the above data, see
here.)