Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog

Author Topic: Antarctic Sea Ice Extent and Area  (Read 979736 times)

wdmn

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 584
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 182
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1000 on: December 13, 2018, 08:55:30 AM »
Thank you Tealight; it's really helpful to see the graph with two standard deviations.

I still haven't seen anyone give an answer to gerontocrat's question about whether we're witnessing a bigger change in the last few years, to bring cause this decline in Antarctic sea ice extent, or whether this is just an anomaly. The rate of melt occurring now may seems like an important piece of evidence to be considered.

I tried to hint to the recovered Nimbus missions above when you asked the first time about losses in previous decades wdmn:
It happened in the 60's as well, check out the recovered Nimbus missions.
Regarding my comments above in #40 & #51 around the recovered Nimbus missions, I'll quote the cires article in #40 to highlight what I personally think is the thing to look for within a couple of years. A record low.
Quote
“And the Antarctic blew us away,” he said. In 1964, sea ice extent in the Antarctic was the largest ever recorded, according to Nimbus image analysis. Two years later, there was a record low for sea ice in the Antarctic, and in 1969 Nimbus imagery, sea ice appears to have reached its maximum extent earliest on record.
Only one weak La Nina during the 60's.
https://www.ggweather.com/enso/oni.htm

Article and links to the data here:
https://earthdata.nasa.gov/new-data-from-old-satellites-a-nimbus-success-story

A bit more here, including a link to a video with Frank Shapiro who was the operations manager back then:
http://www.moonviews.com/nimbus/

Edit; also adding the paper that I linked to back in 2014 below.

Thanks Sleepy, I'm asking too many questions and not paying enough attention to the answers. This is a great resource. I notice that gerontocrat's temperature graphs have massive +ive and -ive anomalies for the years mentioned as being record max and min extents. I'm still new to all of this, and it's fascinating to see how different antarctica's response to the global energy imbalance has been.


gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1001 on: December 13, 2018, 12:10:14 PM »
Thanks for those links Sleepy., especially the forecasts.
It will be interesting to compare the reality with those forecasts next Feb/March.

Mind you, in my simple mind, two years data showing a marked change is just 2 data points, three years only may be a start of a trend.

Meanwhile, daily data update.

JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 10,408,184 km2(December 12, 2018)

A lower drop of 224k , just 14k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 3rd lowest, though still 1.64 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, but only 77k above 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 275k (3.7%) greater than average so far, with on average 47% of extent loss for the season done and just 69 days to minimum (compared wiith  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum (of below 2 million km2) is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row. So much for increased Antarctic Ice Sheet melt causing increased sea ice extent.

Being at the beginning of the Austral summer, low extent and area means once again with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.
(see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs )
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1002 on: December 14, 2018, 07:56:27 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 10,130,804 km2(December 13, 2018)

A drop of 277k , 69k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 3rd lowest, though still 1.61 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, but only 56k above 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 337k (4.4%) greater than average so far, with on average 48% of extent loss for the season done and just 68 days to minimum (compared wiith  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum (of below 2 million km2) is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row. So much for increased Antarctic Ice Sheet melt causing increased sea ice extent.

Being at the beginning of the Austral summer, low extent and area means once again with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.
- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Tealight

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
    • CryosphereComputing
  • Liked: 176
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1003 on: December 14, 2018, 07:10:41 PM »
Antarctic compaction is still going down, now over 10% below average. If we could rearrange the ice in a way for it to be at average compaction then extent would be one million km2 lower. That's equal to 5 days of average losses without any actual melt.

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1004 on: December 14, 2018, 08:35:48 PM »
Antarctic compaction is still going down, now over 10% below average. If we could rearrange the ice in a way for it to be at average compaction then extent would be one million km2 lower. That's equal to 5 days of average losses without any actual melt.
How many SDs out of "normal" now ?
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Tealight

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
    • CryosphereComputing
  • Liked: 176
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1005 on: December 14, 2018, 10:12:19 PM »
Antarctic compaction is still going down, now over 10% below average. If we could rearrange the ice in a way for it to be at average compaction then extent would be one million km2 lower. That's equal to 5 days of average losses without any actual melt.
How many SDs out of "normal" now ?

currently 3.13 SD below normal

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1006 on: December 15, 2018, 08:42:14 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 9,816,575 km2(December 14, 2018)

Extent loss of 314k , 121k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still 1.54 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, and just 25 k below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 463k (5.9%) greater than average so far, with on average 49% of extent loss for the season done and just 67 days to minimum (compared wiith  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum (of well below 2 million km2) is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row. So much for increased Antarctic Ice Sheet melt causing increased sea ice extent.

Being at the beginning of the Austral summer, low extent and area means once again with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1007 on: December 16, 2018, 12:23:21 PM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 9,816,575 km2(December 14, 2018)

Extent loss of 273k , 60k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still 1.50 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, and just 12 k below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 519k (6.4%) greater than average so far, with on average 50.6% of extent loss for the season done and just 66 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row, and the first below 2 million km2. So much for increased Antarctic Ice Sheet melt causing increased sea ice extent.

Being at the beginning of the Austral summer, low extent and area means once again with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
[/quote]
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Aluminium

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1463
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1140
  • Likes Given: 680
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1008 on: December 16, 2018, 02:42:49 PM »
In 2016 ice looked better.

Shared Humanity

  • Guest
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1009 on: December 16, 2018, 03:50:27 PM »
Definitely more compact. The ice along the Ross Shelf looks particularly vulnerable (dispersed).

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1010 on: December 16, 2018, 05:00:35 PM »
I thought I would put the 2 years side by side for a better look.

There's a lot less purple this year.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1011 on: December 16, 2018, 05:18:49 PM »
And the result can be seen in Tealight's Albedo graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs

Note how daily AWP is nearly at 2016 levels even though extent is still 1.5 million km2 above 2016 levels. Cumulative AWP is well behind 2016 due to the slow start of the Antarctic melting season.

The last graph shows where the melting is happening - and where it is not.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1012 on: December 18, 2018, 11:17:27 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 8,852,289 km2(December 17, 2018)

Extent loss of 428k , 181k greater than average on this day. This is unusual, though in 2011 there were two days in a row of 400K+ extent losses, at exactly this time of year.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still 1.167 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, but  222 k below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 744k (8.7%) greater than average so far, with on average 53.5% of extent loss for the season done and just 64 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row, and the first below 2 million km2. So much for increased Antarctic Ice Sheet melt causing increased sea ice extent.

Most of the remaining ice is at low concentration, so being in the Austral summer, low extent and area means with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Tealight

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
    • CryosphereComputing
  • Liked: 176
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1013 on: December 18, 2018, 10:50:05 PM »
Antarctic Sea Ice Area is now at record low, 60,000 km2 below 2016 and 2.72 SD below the mean. This is even slightly below the low estimate of my SIPN_south forecast which is already far lower than any other forecast. With compaction staying at record low too, I don't expect this year to slow down in area losses like 2016 which turned to above average compaction at this point.

more Area data and sea ice map on:
https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/daily-data-antarctic


gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1014 on: December 19, 2018, 06:56:00 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 8,547,808 km2(December 18, 2018)

Extent loss of 304k , 57k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still at 9a reducing) 1.02 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, but  336 k below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 808k (9.2%) greater than average so far, with on average 55.1% of extent loss for the season done and 63 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row, and the first below 2 million km2. Indeed,  the average remaining melt from this day to minimum would produce a minimum of 1.4 million km2, 0.75 million km2 less than the record low in 2016-17. This result is hard to believe.

Most of the remaining ice is at low concentration, so being in the Austral summer, low extent and area means with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1015 on: December 19, 2018, 06:58:39 AM »
The attached image shows the extent to which 2018 sea ice is falling to bits compared with 2016
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Aluminium

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1463
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1140
  • Likes Given: 680
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1016 on: December 19, 2018, 08:52:47 AM »
Extent is 2nd lowest
According to this, extent is 3rd lowest, 150k above 1979.

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1017 on: December 19, 2018, 05:03:40 PM »
Extent is 2nd lowest
According to this, extent is 3rd lowest, 150k above 1979.
True.

I did not go back as far as 1979. As the year turned, that 1979 2nd lowest turned into the middle of the pack by end of January 1980.

It is also true that Antarctic sea ice extent did not decrease, and maybe increased a fraction until about 2014. The question is whether the last three years' large decreases are temporary or permanent.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1018 on: December 19, 2018, 05:06:31 PM »
Compaction must still be low, can be seen in Tealight's Albedo graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs

Note how daily AWP is now higher than 2016 levels even though extent is still 1 million km2 above 2016 levels. Cumulative AWP is well behind 2016 due to the slow start of the Antarctic melting season.

The last graph shows where the melting is happening - and where it is not.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Shared Humanity

  • Guest
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1019 on: December 19, 2018, 08:14:06 PM »
The attached image shows the extent to which 2018 sea ice is falling to bits compared with 2016

The Ross Sea especially concerns me. I am not sure the exact year but, recently, there was an unprecedented melt on the surface of the Ross Ice Shelf. Could the destruction of the ice in the Ross Sea set us up for a repeat?

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1020 on: December 20, 2018, 10:43:33 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 8,284,049 km2(December 19, 2018)

Extent loss of 264k , 90k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still at (a reducing) 0.97 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, but  414 k below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 896k (10.0%) greater than average so far, with on average 56.2% of extent loss for the season done and 62 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row, and the first below 2 million km2. Indeed,  the average remaining melt from this day to minimum would produce a minimum of 1.31 million km2, 0.83 million km2 less than the record low in 2016-17. This result is hard to believe.

All models have limitations. The first table attached shows that remaining melt in two previous years would result in an extent minimum of less than zero, an impossibility. Nevertheless, that is useful in that it shows how much extent this year is below that of the years to 2015.

Most of the remaining ice is at low concentration, so being in the Austral summer, low extent and area means with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

wdmn

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 584
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 182
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1021 on: December 20, 2018, 01:51:47 PM »
I've never heard discussions about antarctic summer sea ice reaching zero.

If austral summer sea ice went to zero this year, how significant/unexpected would that be? I understand that most of the ice disappears each year anyway, but it would still be quite an increase in AWP, I would guess; would it effect glacial melt at all?


Tealight

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 490
    • View Profile
    • CryosphereComputing
  • Liked: 176
  • Likes Given: 17
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1022 on: December 20, 2018, 03:42:26 PM »
I've never heard discussions about antarctic summer sea ice reaching zero.

If austral summer sea ice went to zero this year, how significant/unexpected would that be? I understand that most of the ice disappears each year anyway, but it would still be quite an increase in AWP, I would guess; would it effect glacial melt at all?

We won't get to truly zero ice, because the Weddel Sea is sheltered by the Antarctic Peninsula. It will be about as hard to melt as the ice pack north of Greenland/Canadian Archipelago. In the 40 years of satellite observations there has only been one year 1992/1993 which had exceptional weather to force melt in this region. Due to this event 1993 still holds the record low in sea ice area with 1.248 million km2 compared to second place 2017 with 1.514. Without significant melt in the west Weddel Sea we won't reach record low sea ice area this year either.

Attached is a map showing the lowest possible sea ice concentration by combining 2006-2018.

Regarding glacial melt, most of it comes from warm deep sea currents. What I'm still waiting to see is more surface melt in the coastal regions.

Edit: I'm on holiday until New Year, but daily updates should continue for all my Near Real-Time data.

https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/daily-data-antarctic
https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
« Last Edit: December 20, 2018, 04:06:12 PM by Tealight »

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1023 on: December 20, 2018, 04:41:47 PM »
I've never heard discussions about antarctic summer sea ice reaching zero.

If austral summer sea ice went to zero this year, how significant/unexpected would that be? I understand that most of the ice disappears each year anyway, but it would still be quite an increase in AWP, I would guess; would it effect glacial melt at all?

We won't get to truly zero ice, because the Weddel Sea is sheltered by the Antarctic Peninsula. It will be about as hard to melt as the ice pack north of Greenland/Canadian Archipelago. In the 40 years of satellite observations there has only been one year 1992/1993 which had exceptional weather to force melt in this region. Due to this event 1993 still holds the record low in sea ice area with 1.248 million km2 compared to second place 2017 with 1.514. Without significant melt in the west Weddel Sea we won't reach record low sea ice area this year either.

Attached is a map showing the lowest possible sea ice concentration by combining 2006-2018.


quote author=wdmn
Quote
If austral summer sea ice went to zero this year.... it would still be quite an increase in AWP, I would guess. would it effect glacial melt at all?
AWP? Not really. as it would happen late February / March, at the end of the Austral summer, so insolation is already dropping quickly by then. It is what is happening now that is really shoving additional heat into the southern ocean. First image shows how daily Albedo Warming Potential is going through the roof. Tealight might have to increase the range on the y-axis.

Glacial melt. The longer the ice shelves are exposed to the open ocean the longer the impact of wave action and surface currents. And surface air will have lost less heat from passing over sea ice. How significant ? not a clue. 

2nd image shows how broken up most of the remaining sea ice is. The sea ice in the Ross Sea is toast. Final sea ice area and extent will be determined by how resistant the purple bits will be to melting.

ps:-Note how Iceberg A-68 is right in the middle of the most stubborn sea ice (orange circle).
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Stephan

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 2649
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 758
  • Likes Given: 459
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1024 on: December 20, 2018, 05:41:43 PM »
Just a stupid question: What is counted as Antarctic Sea Ice?
1. We have a lot of thin floes of sea ice (mostly 1-year ice), some of them packed together by winds or currents, but principally mobile
2. We have fast ice around the coast of the continent and between the coastline and the little islands around Antarctica, some of it grounded to submarine hills
3. We have large broken-off ice bergs (originating from shelves or fast ice), some of them dozens of km² large, floating around and slowly melting
4. We have ice shelves (like Ross, Rønne/Filchner, Getz, Larsen) etc.
The latter one do probably not count into "Antarctic Sea Ice", even thogh there is water beneath them. What is with fast ice?
It is too late just to be concerned about Climate Change

wdmn

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 584
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 182
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1025 on: December 20, 2018, 06:35:59 PM »
Thanks for the responses.

@tealight

I notice that sea ice concentration in the Weddel Sea is already lower on the north and western edges than in the image of the lowest possible area that you posted.

@gerontocrat

I have been looking at tealight's graphs and saw the recent spike. But looking ahead to the March low 1993 still had a higher AWP than any year, so low does make some difference. I'm just trying to imagine where that low point might be and so what the slope from the solstice until then will be like. I guess I should do some calculations to see how much of a difference it might make.

Aluminium

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1463
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1140
  • Likes Given: 680
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1026 on: December 20, 2018, 06:58:51 PM »
Antarctic sea ice is mostly located north of 75S. Sun reach 15-25 degrees above horizon at Equinox here.

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1027 on: December 20, 2018, 09:17:01 PM »
My first attempt a a gif. Will it work? Sort of, but it was supposed to go slower faster than that.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2018, 09:39:36 PM by gerontocrat »
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

wdmn

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 584
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 182
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1028 on: December 20, 2018, 09:58:49 PM »
A bit slow but helpful. Thanks!

Looks like concentration in the Weddell sea has decreased rapidly over the last two days. I trust Tealight's experience, but am now very interested to see how it holds up the rest of melt season.

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1029 on: December 20, 2018, 10:37:09 PM »
Just a stupid question: What is counted as Antarctic Sea Ice?
1. We have a lot of thin floes of sea ice (mostly 1-year ice), some of them packed together by winds or currents, but principally mobile
2. We have fast ice around the coast of the continent and between the coastline and the little islands around Antarctica, some of it grounded to submarine hills
3. We have large broken-off ice bergs (originating from shelves or fast ice), some of them dozens of km² large, floating around and slowly melting
4. We have ice shelves (like Ross, Rønne/Filchner, Getz, Larsen) etc.
The latter one do probably not count into "Antarctic Sea Ice", even thogh there is water beneath them. What is with fast ice?

M understanding is that:
-Sea ice is frozen sea water.
- Ice formed by freezing freshwater (mostly snowfall) is not.

So, in theory,
- if the origin of the ice is the sea, it is sea ice,
- if the origin of the ice is from land / snow, it is not sea ice.

In practice, 1. and 2. are sea ice.
3. , the bergs, even though they are mostly frozen freshwater, are included as how can the satellites cope with hundreds, thousands, of moving objects? I wonder if berg A-68 (5,000 km2) is masked out? But with sea ice in the range from 2 to 20 million, and daily ice loss of around 200,000 or more per day at the moment, it is not significant.
4. The ice shelves are frozen freshwater formed from glaciers moving into the ocean plus a few 10s of thousands of years of snowfall on top. I wonder if some have sea ice at their base from when they first formed?

Both NSIDC and JAXA use a mask to exclude the continent and the ice shelves from the measurements.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

magnamentis

  • Guest
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1030 on: December 21, 2018, 12:31:09 AM »
Just a stupid question: What is counted as Antarctic Sea Ice?
1. We have a lot of thin floes of sea ice (mostly 1-year ice), some of them packed together by winds or currents, but principally mobile
2. We have fast ice around the coast of the continent and between the coastline and the little islands around Antarctica, some of it grounded to submarine hills
3. We have large broken-off ice bergs (originating from shelves or fast ice), some of them dozens of km² large, floating around and slowly melting
4. We have ice shelves (like Ross, Rønne/Filchner, Getz, Larsen) etc.
The latter one do probably not count into "Antarctic Sea Ice", even thogh there is water beneath them. What is with fast ice?

M understanding is that:
-Sea ice is frozen sea water.
- Ice formed by freezing freshwater (mostly snowfall) is not.

So, in theory,
- if the origin of the ice is the sea, it is sea ice,
- if the origin of the ice is from land / snow, it is not sea ice.

In practice, 1. and 2. are sea ice.
3. , the bergs, even though they are mostly frozen freshwater, are included as how can the satellites cope with hundreds, thousands, of moving objects? I wonder if berg A-68 (5,000 km2) is masked out? But with sea ice in the range from 2 to 20 million, and daily ice loss of around 200,000 or more per day at the moment, it is not significant.
4. The ice shelves are frozen freshwater formed from glaciers moving into the ocean plus a few 10s of thousands of years of snowfall on top. I wonder if some have sea ice at their base from when they first formed?

Both NSIDC and JAXA use a mask to exclude the continent and the ice shelves from the measurements.

for me sea-ice is ice with water under it's kiel, kind of "swimming" in the water and if it's connected to land (makes contact to land) it's landfast sea-ice.

it's well possible that you're right but i opt for definition that are mutually understood and don't need a doctorate to be understood, else we shall never reach all 7 billion inhabitants on planet earth.

so for me, a berg, even should his origin be 1000km inland of greenland or antarctica, the moment it's swimming in the ocean it's sea-ice and "former"  land-ice and perhaps in between "shelf-ice" and/or land-fast sea-ice.

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1031 on: December 21, 2018, 06:05:00 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 7,996,790 km2(December 20, 2018)

Extent loss of 287k , 77k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still at (a reducing) 0.85 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, but  475 k below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 972k (10.6%) greater than average so far, with on average 57.5% of extent loss for the season done and 61 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row, and the first below 2 million km2. Indeed,  the average remaining melt from this day to minimum would produce a minimum of 1.24 million km2, 0.91 million km2 less than the record low in 2016-17. This result is hard to believe.

All models have limitations. The first table attached shows that remaining melt in two of the previous years would result in an extent minimum of less than zero, an impossibility. Nevertheless, that is useful in that it shows how much extent this year is below that of the years to 2015.

Most of the remaining ice is at low concentration, so being in the Austral summer, low extent and area means with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1032 on: December 21, 2018, 10:45:41 AM »
My little gif showing disintegration of the sea ice.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1033 on: December 22, 2018, 10:23:35 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 7,693,619 km2(December 21, 2018)

Images only today (hangover after solstice celebration)
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1034 on: December 22, 2018, 11:06:10 AM »
And a final image to show how broken up the ice is this year compared with 2016, the year of the current record low extent.

It makes one think that a record low extent is perhaps probable, rather than merely possible. But.....
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1035 on: December 23, 2018, 01:32:29 PM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 7,404,381 km2(December 22, 2018)

Extent loss of 289k , 66k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still at (a quickly reducing) 0.52 million km2 greater than 2016 on this day, but  598 k below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 1.12 million km2 (11.7%) greater than average so far, with on average 60.3% of extent loss for the season done and 59 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row, and the first below 2 million km2. Indeed,  the average remaining melt from this day to minimum would produce a minimum of 1.09 million km2, 1 million km2 less than the record low in 2016-17. This result is hard to believe.

All models have limitations. The first table attached shows that remaining melt in two of the previous years would result in an extent minimum of less than zero, an impossibility. Nevertheless, that is useful in that it shows how much extent this year is below that of the years to 2015.

Most of the remaining ice is at low concentration, adding to the chances of a record low extent. Being in the Austral summer, low extent and area means with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Tor Bejnar

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 4606
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 879
  • Likes Given: 826
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1036 on: December 23, 2018, 03:01:16 PM »
Gerontocrat,
Thanks, but the way, for adding other relevant single years to the decadal charts. Most helpful, indeed!

If I had only "liked" the post (or the first one with added single years), would the additional line be deemed appreciated? Or the trajectory? Or the size of the new daily drop? Or 'G. is just a cool person'? Or 'I'm cooling his heels because he has kompromat on me'?   :) 8) ::) :-\ :-X
Arctic ice is healthy for children and other living things because "we cannot negotiate with the melting point of ice"

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1037 on: December 23, 2018, 03:32:55 PM »
Gerontocrat,
Thanks, but the way, for adding other relevant single years to the decadal charts. Most helpful, indeed!

If I had only "liked" the post (or the first one with added single years), would the additional line be deemed appreciated? Or the trajectory? Or the size of the new daily drop? Or 'G. is just a cool person'? Or 'I'm cooling his heels because he has kompromat on me'?   :) 8) ::) :-\ :-X
That is for me to know and you to not to find out. A-ha.

First image shows how broken up the ice is compared with the same date in 2016, the year of record ice loss.

Next images are from Tealight's oh so good AWP graphs on
https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs

The last is my little gif from Univ Bremen images.

If this keeps up the first BOE will be in the Southern hemisphere.

"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1038 on: December 24, 2018, 09:19:40 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 7,078,498 km2(December 23, 2018)

Extent loss of 326k , 118k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still at (a quickly reducing) 377 k greater than 2016 on this day, but 755 k below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 1.23 million km2 (12.6%) greater than average so far, with on average 61.6% of extent loss for the season done and 58 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

A record low minimum is a real possibility, making 3 years in a row, and the first below 2 million km2. Indeed,  the average remaining melt from this day to minimum would produce a minimum of 0.97 million km2, nearly 1.2 million km2 less than the record low in 2016-17. This result is hard to believe.

All models have limitations. The first table attached shows that remaining melt in two of the previous years would result in an extent minimum of less than zero, an impossibility. Nevertheless, that is useful in that it shows how much extent this year is below that of the years to 2015.

Most of the remaining ice is at low concentration, adding to the chances of a record low extent. Being in the Austral summer, low extent and area means with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1039 on: December 24, 2018, 04:28:02 PM »
Here is the graph from Wipneus on Antarctic area - at a record low

And then the gif showing the loss day by day.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Shared Humanity

  • Guest
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1040 on: December 24, 2018, 05:30:48 PM »
With area at record low, record low compactness and extent dropping like a rock, a new record low SIE and SIA is very likely.

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1041 on: December 25, 2018, 10:51:58 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 6,775,143 km2(December 24, 2018)

continues to drop like a rock.

Merry Xmas
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Stephan

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 2649
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 758
  • Likes Given: 459
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1042 on: December 25, 2018, 03:08:47 PM »
Since Dec 10 the daily losses have been below above - or even much below above - the average daily losses. I wonder how long it will be going on like this...

Edit: of course higher than average losses, not lower, thanks for that.
« Last Edit: December 25, 2018, 08:25:14 PM by Stephan »
It is too late just to be concerned about Climate Change

colchonero

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 140
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 27
  • Likes Given: 5
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1043 on: December 25, 2018, 06:26:28 PM »
You mean above average ;)?  Well, when we look at the ice concentration, I wouldn't bet on long-term below average losses.

wdmn

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 584
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 182
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1044 on: December 25, 2018, 09:14:57 PM »
Extent is catching up to area as compaction percentage is climbing (see tealight's graph below).

Also looks like the temperature anomaly for 60-90S will be dropping over the next week (see GFS projections below).

Tealight's earlier point about the Weddell sea being very difficult to melt also suggests we are likely getting through the easier melt areas and might expect a slowdown soon (which is normal at this time of year according to the graphs).

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1045 on: December 26, 2018, 09:57:48 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 6,478,034 km2(December 25, 2018)

Extent loss of 297k , 63k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, though still (at a quickly reducing) 192 k greater than 2016 on this day, but 1 million km2 below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 1.345 million km2 (13.1%) greater than average so far, with on average 64.7% of extent loss for the season done and 56 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

The average remaining melt from this day to minimum would produce a minimum of 0.87 million km2,  1.28 million km2 less than the record low in 2016-17. A good proportion of the remaining ice is at low concentration, adding to the chances of a record low extent. However, when that is gone the solid land fast ice on the coast will likely slow down further melt to a crawl. Nevertheless, a record low minimum, the first below 2 million km2, is my guess for the 2019 minimum, continuing the loss of Antarctic sea ice over the last three years.

All models have limitations. The first table attached shows that remaining melt in three of the previous years would result in an extent minimum of less than zero, an impossibility. Nevertheless, that is useful in that it shows how much extent this year is below that of the years to 2015.

Being in the Austral summer, low extent and area means with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1046 on: December 27, 2018, 08:53:05 AM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 6,259,869 km2(December 26, 2018)

Extent loss of 218k , 26k greater than average on this day.

Extent is 2nd lowest, at a reducing 128 k greater than 2016 on this day, and 1,05 million km2 below 2017. Extent loss from maximum is 1.365 million km2 (13.0%) greater than average so far, with on average 65.9% of extent loss for the season done and 56 days to minimum (compared with  last 10 years average).

The average remaining melt from this day to minimum would produce a minimum of 0.84 million km2,  1.31 million km2 less than the record low in 2016-17. A good proportion of the remaining ice is at low concentration compared with 2016 (see next post) adding to the chances of a record low extent. However, when that low concentration ice is gone the solid land fast ice on the coast will likely slow down further melt to a crawl. Nevertheless, a record low minimum, the first below 2 million km2, is my guess for the 2019 minimum, continuing the loss of Antarctic sea ice over the last three years.

All models have limitations. The first table attached shows that remaining melt in three of the previous years would result in an extent minimum of less than zero, an impossibility. Nevertheless, that is useful in that it shows how much extent this year is below that of the years to 2015.

Being in the Austral summer, low extent and area means with insolation high, albedo warming potential in the Antarctic is also high and well above average.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20376
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5289
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1047 on: December 27, 2018, 09:02:36 AM »
The first image shows the vulnerability of the remaining ice to melt compared with 2016.

The second is a gif showing the melt over the last few days.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

karl dubhe2

  • New ice
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 27
  • Likes Given: 31
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1048 on: December 27, 2018, 02:10:52 PM »
JAXA ANTARCTIC Sea Ice Extent - 6,259,869 km2(December 26, 2018)



All models have limitations. The first table attached shows that remaining melt in three of the previous years would result in an extent minimum of less than zero, an impossibility.

- see Tealight graphs at https://sites.google.com/site/cryospherecomputing/awp/antarctic-graphs

Not to be too contrary, but I think it is possible for a extent minimum of less than zero.    There is ice on land, which could be said to be the source of the negative value for the extent minimum.  If the land ice collapses like the side of Anuk...   Of course, that's just playing with words really. 

SteveMDFP

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 2476
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 583
  • Likes Given: 42
Re: Sea Ice Extent around Antarctica
« Reply #1049 on: December 27, 2018, 02:25:37 PM »

All models have limitations. The first table attached shows that remaining melt in three of the previous years would result in an extent minimum of less than zero, an impossibility. 

I think models that generate negative sea ice over a given area might be predicting something useful, maybe important.  The meaning of a negative ice thickness could be a statement that the surface waters to some depth (1m? 10m? 100?) are sufficiently warm to melt a thickness of ice equal to that value.  Predictions of water warmth above freezing would have significance for the climate, weather, and future ice development.

I'm not sure results of negative ice thickness are meaningless.