I'll follow up Lodger's wonderful poetry & humor with a few serious thoughts on "Picking Cherries."
Anyone who has ever designed tests, collected and reduced the data, analyzed the data, prepared the charts and graphs, written the reports and then prepared and presented the results understands the difficulty on deciding how to describe and present complex technical results. In my estimation, "Cherry Picking" is a deliberate attempt to portray data in a manner that leads the reader or audience to false conclusions (Good or Bad).
The community of "Denialists" will always call every piece of AGW/CC data "Cherry Picked" no matter how it is collected or portrayed. If you provide them regional data, the want global data. If you provide them global data they will accuse you of hiding regional data. If you provide them with ten years of data they will ask for a hundred years of data.
For those who are preparing and presenting climate data all you can do is present the data in the manner that accurately and honestly portrays the message you want delivered. The true audience is those people who are willing to learn, not the "Denialists" who will falsely find fault with every piece of data you present, no matter your credentials or personal ethics.