Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog

Author Topic: Forests: An Endangered Resource  (Read 125017 times)

vox_mundi

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 10233
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 3517
  • Likes Given: 754
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #600 on: October 04, 2023, 05:29:43 PM »
More and More Emerging Diseases Threaten Trees Around the World
https://phys.org/news/2023-10-emerging-diseases-threaten-trees-world.html



Diseases are among the major causes of tree mortality in both forests and urban areas. New diseases are continually being introduced, and pathogens are continually jumping to new hosts, threatening more and more tree species. When exposed to novel hosts, emerging diseases can cause mortality previously unseen in the native range.

Although not all diseases will outright kill their hosts, some can dramatically affect host populations. In the 20th century, chestnut blight, perhaps the most well-known tree disease in North America, effectively eliminated chestnut as an overstory tree in its native range in the Appalachian Mountains. More recently, we've seen sudden oak death in California, ash dieback in Europe, and butternut canker in the eastern US, each having the potential to eliminate host tree populations and alter the ecosystems where they occur.

"The continued emergence and accumulation of new diseases increases the likelihood of a particularly detrimental one emerging, and harming host tree populations," says Dr. Andrew Gougherty, research landscape ecologist at the USDA Forest Service. Recently, he has been exploring where tree diseases have accumulated fastest, and which trees are most impacted by new diseases. This information could help researchers and land managers better predict where new diseases may be most likely to emerge.

The study, recently published in NeoBiota, analyzes over 900 new disease reports on 284 tree species in 88 countries and quantified how emerging infectious diseases have accumulated geographically and on different hosts. "The 'big data' approach used in this study helps to characterize the growing threat posed by emergent infectious diseases and how this threat is unequally distributed regionally and by host species," the author writes.

Dr. Gougherty found that globally, the number of emerged diseases has accumulated rapidly over the past two decades. "The accumulation is apparent both where tree species are native and where they are not native, and the number of new disease emergences globally were found to double every ~11 years," he explains.

"Unfortunately, there is little evidence of saturation in emergent tree disease accumulation. Global trends show little sign of slowing, suggesting the impact of newly emerged diseases is likely to continue to compound and threaten tree populations globally and into the future," warns Dr. Gougherty. "Climate change is likely also playing a role, both by creating more favorable conditions for pathogens and by stressing host plants."

 Andrew V. Gougherty, Emerging tree diseases are accumulating rapidly in the native and non-native ranges of Holarctic trees, NeoBiota (2023)
https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/103525/
“There are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.” ― anonymous

Insensible before the wave so soon released by callous fate. Affected most, they understand the least, and understanding, when it comes, invariably arrives too late

wdmn

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 584
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 231
  • Likes Given: 182
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #601 on: October 04, 2023, 11:12:02 PM »
More and More Emerging Diseases Threaten Trees Around the World
https://phys.org/news/2023-10-emerging-diseases-threaten-trees-world.html

A recent article on the recent affliction of some species of trees in Toronto, Ontario:

On Horse-chestnuts:

"Though this fungal infection of the horse-chestnuts has not been shown to be fatal, it is greatly reduces photosynthesis, as leaf surface area (and number of living cells) are reduced for much of the growing season. This slows the annual growth of trees, and lowers chestnut production. All of these things can be ignored by most, most of the time, but if you have an ecological awareness, living with such a visible sign of sickness during summer’s flourishing is a bit like living in an apartment with a chirping smoke detector. Since it no longer makes sense to plant the species, the fungus will effectively result in local extinction (or extirpation)."

On Norway maples:

"Just over a decade ago the leaves on the Norways started becoming noticeably blotchy, with large black circles forming each year on their surface. Then the visible signs of powdery mildew appeared: a white film on the surface. For the first several years this mildew was not very pronounced, just a few small white spots; another aesthetic wound, grating on the senses but — as the City of Toronto reassures on its website — not a real threat to the tree.

But over the last few years the affliction has gotten much worse. The leaves are widely covered in the fungus by mid summer, greatly reducing their ability to carry out photosynthesis. Some leaves curl up and drop long before they would be shed in healthy times. Unable to properly draw up water through transpiration these trees are particularly vulnerable in drought conditions (such as we currently have in Toronto). Whole branches, “die back,” and the trees begin to go bare. After multiple years of this, the growth of trees is noticeably stunted, and in their weakened state many trees become more vulnerable to other forces of disease and decay (such as carpenter ants). The death spiral has set in."

link to article
https://leolepiano.substack.com/p/ecology-and-grief

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #602 on: October 10, 2023, 05:57:36 PM »
Doing it the wrong way:

Carbon-capture tree plantations threaten tropical biodiversity for little gain, ecologists say

The increasingly urgent climate crisis has led to a boom in commercial tree plantations in an attempt to offset excess carbon emissions. However, authors of a peer-reviewed opinion paper publishing October 3 in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution argue that these carbon-offset plantations might come with costs for biodiversity and other ecosystem functions. Instead, the authors say we should prioritize conserving and restoring intact ecosystems.

"Despite the broad range of ecosystem functions and services provided by tropical ecosystems, society has reduced value of these ecosystems to just one metric -- carbon," write the authors, led by Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez of the Environmental Change Institute at the University of Oxford. "Current and new policy should not promote ecosystem degradation via tree plantations with a narrow view on carbon capture."

Tropical ecosystems, which include forests, grasslands, and savannahs, are attractive sites for tree plantations because their climate and physical features promote rapid tree growth (and rapid tree growth means rapid carbon capture). Although some tree plantations involve reforestation of degraded land, in many cases they involve afforestation -- planting forests in undegraded and previously unforested regions such as grasslands.

It's often assumed that tree planting for carbon capture also benefits biodiversity and enhances socioeconomic benefits, but the authors argue that this is usually not the case. Tropical ecosystems are highly biodiverse, and they provide multiple ecosystem services, such as maintaining water quality, soil health, and pollination. In comparison, carbon-capture plantations are usually monocultures and are dominated globally by just five tree species -- teak, mahogany, cedar, silk oak, and black wattle -- that are grown for timber, pulp, or agroforestry.

Although these plantations might be economically valuable, they usually support a lower level of biodiversity. For example, in the Brazilian Cerrado savannah, a 40% increase in woody cover reduced the diversity of plants and ants by approximately 30%. These plantations can also directly degrade ecosystems by reducing stream flow, depleting groundwater, and acidifying soils.

The authors argue that even ambitious commitments to carbon-capture plantations will be limited in their ability to capture carbon. "The current trend of carbon-focused tree planting is taking us along the path of large-scale biotic and functional homogenization for little carbon gain," the authors write. "An area equivalent to the total summed area of USA, UK, China, and Russia would have to be forested to sequester one year of emissions."

And tropical grasslands and savannahs are already carbon sinks. When intact, tropical grasslands and savannahs store large quantities of carbon below ground. In contrast to carbon-capture tree plantations, which predominantly store carbon above ground, these below-ground carbon sinks -- which would be lost if afforested -- are less susceptible to disturbances such as drought and fire.

The authors say that there are considerable financial incentives for private companies to offset their carbon emissions by investing in carbon capture and that the boom in carbon-capture plantations is being driven by money, not ecology. Compared to parameters such as biodiversity and ecosystem services, carbon is easy to measure and monetize. But overemphasizing the benefits of tree planting for carbon capture "can disincentive the protection of intact ecosystems and can lead to negative trade-offs between carbon, biodiversity, and ecosystem function," the authors write.

Instead of focusing on commercial tree planting, the authors say we should prioritize conserving intact ecosystems. "An overarching view on maintaining original ecosystem functioning and maximizing as many ecosystem services as possible should be prioritized above the ongoing economic focus on carbon capture projects," they write.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/10/231003173442.htm
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kiwichick16

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 936
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 90
  • Likes Given: 36

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #604 on: October 12, 2023, 03:40:04 PM »
Quote
Scaled to population, Bolivia’s deforestation is four times that of Brazil. Even as Brazil’s deforestation falls, Bolivia’s is rising. Its loss rate of primary forest jumped by 32% from 2021 to 2022, according to Global Forest Watch.

Most of this is happening in Santa Cruz, Bolivia’s most economically dynamic region, where most of its soya and beef, as well as its sugar cane, corn and sorghum, is produced.

Santa Cruz is also home to the Chiquitanía, a dry forest ecosystem that is part of the Amazon watershed. Almost a quarter of it has been deforested since 1985.

“Santa Cruz has a vision of development that is very marked by intensive agriculture,” says Alcides Vadillo, director of Fundación Tierra, an NGO. “We are seeing how capital and machinery can change forest into productive lands.”

...

Anapo, the industry organisation for Bolivia’s soya farmers, denies that the sector is responsible for deforestation, saying that the surface area dedicated to soya farming has barely increased in recent years. But Stasiek Czaplicki, an environmental economist who contributed to the Trase report, says this a sleight of hand. New lands are continually being deforested and sown with soya for a few years, with diminishing yields, until they are given over to another activity, such as low-intensity ranching. So, the overall surface area might not be rising – but the sector is still driving deforestation.

In Bolivia, it is cheaper to buy forest land and turn it into farmland than to invest in existing farmland to improve its productivity and longevity. Moreover, that land will appreciate in value – which hints at the thriving business behind agriculture in Santa Cruz.

“The soya business isn’t really a soya business,” says Czaplicki. “It’s the business of land.”

...

Third after Brazil and Congo.
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #605 on: October 16, 2023, 01:58:03 PM »
Brazil tells landowners to stop setting fires in Amazon 'climate emergency'

Brazil's government told ranchers and farmers on Friday to stop setting fires in the Amazon rainforest as clouds of dense gray smoke make the air increasingly unbreathable in the northern city of Manaus, threatening sanctions if they do burn areas of land.

"Fire is not natural in the Amazon, it comes from criminal actions or deforestation," Environment Minister Marina Silva told reporters. "There are people criminally setting fire to public and private areas."

The world's largest rainforest is facing a historical drought worsened by the El Niño weather phenomenon. Rainfall below average is increasing the polluting effects of the region's annual burning season.

This is the time of the year when fires tend to spike in the Amazon as rain subsides, making it easier for ranchers and farmers who use fires to clear land, raise cattle and grow commercial crops.

According to the Brazilian government, 60 of the 62 cities in northern Amazonas, the Brazilian state with the biggest indigenous population, have declared a state of emergency because of drought and wildfires, and the month of October is expected to be "challenging."

...

https://news.cgtn.com/news/2023-10-15/Brazil-tells-landowners-to-stop-fires-in-Amazon-climate-emergency--1nUUQA4GQQE/index.html
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #606 on: October 25, 2023, 08:34:58 PM »
Destruction of forests gathered pace in 2022, despite global promises


Global destruction of forests increased by 4% last year, compared to 2021, according to a new report.

A total of 6.6 million hectares of forests were lost in 2022—an area more than one and a half times as large as Switzerland, according to the Forest Declaration assessment.

The report, which was to be published in Washington on Tuesday by scientific organizations and civil associations including the environmental foundation WWF, juxtaposed the global destruction with public promises by countries, companies and investors to work toward an end to forest destruction.

Countries, companies and investors have actually publicly promised to work towards an end to the global destruction of forests and to restore as much as 350 million hectares of destroyed land by the end of 2030.

But the report says the world was a long way from this goal in 2022. Agriculture, road building, fires and commercial logging were the main drivers of destruction, the report said.

...

https://phys.org/news/2023-10-destruction-forests-pace-global.html

We know what has to be done...
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

vox_mundi

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 10233
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 3517
  • Likes Given: 754
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #607 on: October 26, 2023, 05:16:12 PM »
75% of Exclusive Hardwood May Be Illegally Harvested
https://phys.org/news/2023-10-exclusive-hardwood-illegally-harvested.html

The tropical wood type ipê is popular for building exclusive wooden decks, and in North America and Europe, the demand for the material has increased sharply.

Now, a study from Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, shows that more than three-quarters of all ipê from the top producing region in Brazil could have been harvested illegally. "The study reveals where in the chain the greatest risks lie. It can be a tool to counteract illegal logging," says Caroline S.S. Franca, Ph.D. student at Chalmers.

Ipê is one of the world's hardest woods. It is therefore particularly suitable for building balconies, conservatories, stairs or piers. Demand for the exclusive, tropical wood has increased steadily in recent years, especially on European, American and Canadian markets. In Brazil, the country of origin for 96% of all ipê on the market, exports have increased by over 76% in volume over the past decade.

"Some products from the rainforest are more valuable and therefore more vulnerable to illegal logging. Ipê is at the top of that list. At the same time, ipê trees grow slowly, which means that regrowth takes a long time. The risk of extinction is real, and today there are no reliable figures on the amount of remaining trees and the damage to existing stands that has already been done," says Caroline S.S. Franca, Ph.D. student in Physical Resource Theory at Chalmers.

Caroline S.S. Franca is the lead author of a research study on the risks for illegal logging of ipê in Brazil, which was published in Nature Sustainability. In the study, "Quantifying timber illegality risk in the Brazilian forest frontier," the researchers analyzed extensive amounts of data to identify where in the supply chains there are significant risks that logging has taken place illegally.

The conclusion is that more than three-quarters of all ipê from Pará—the top producing state of this wood in Brazil and a major source of exports—in the period 2009–2019 may have been illegally harvested.

"In the study, we see, for example, that 16% of the ipê that ends up on the market is harvested without proper permits, and that landowners claim that they have felled more ipê on their land than is likely to exist on the stated area. We also show that there is more wood in circulation than the official production figures indicate," she says.

More about the ipê market

- Brazil is the country of origin for 96% of all ipê on the market.
- Brazil's exports of ipê have increased by over 76% in volume between the period 2010—2021.
- 85% of the demand for ipê comes from European, American and Canadian markets. 45% of exports go to Europe.
- Since 2017, at least 525,000 metric tons, or 470,000 cubic meters of ipê, have been exported from Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay and Peru.
- At least two-thirds of the species exported as ipê from the Amazon region in 2017–2021 are on the IUCN list of species threatened with extinction. Ipê is also on the list of species threatened by overexploitation due to international trade.

Caroline S. S. Franca et al, Quantifying timber illegality risk in the Brazilian forest frontier, Nature Sustainability (2023)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-023-01189-3
“There are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.” ― anonymous

Insensible before the wave so soon released by callous fate. Affected most, they understand the least, and understanding, when it comes, invariably arrives too late

solartim27

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 599
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 75
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #608 on: October 26, 2023, 06:17:39 PM »
Interesting oped about just how stupid we can be
https://amp.fresnobee.com/opinion/readers-opinion/article280746000.html
Quote
The Park Service plans to plant in areas with less than 14,112 sequoia seedlings per acre. That’s a lot of seedlings – roughly one tree every three square feet. In areas we surveyed, year-old seedlings are already two to three feet tall, and they are so abundant it is difficult to walk without fear of stepping on them.

Frankly, planting crews will likely crush just as many seedlings as they plant in such places.
Also discusses how they have introduced diseases in previous plantings.
FNORD

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #609 on: November 04, 2023, 10:40:24 AM »
The world’s boreal forests may be shrinking as climate change pushes them northward

Earth’s boreal forests circle our planet’s far northern reaches, just south of the Arctic’s treeless tundra. If the planet wears an Arctic ice cap, then the boreal forests are a loose-knit headband wrapped around its ears, covering large portions of Alaska, Canada, Scandinavia and Siberia.

The boreal region’s soils have long buffered the planet against warming by storing huge quantities of carbon and keeping it out of the atmosphere. Its remoteness has historically protected its forests and wetlands from extensive human impact.

These two traits rank boreal forests among the most important ecosystems on Earth. In addition, numerous species of mammals, fish, plants, insects and birds make these forests home.

For over two centuries, scientists have recognized that climate plays a key role in determining the geographic zones of plant communities. Because boreal forests and soils face subzero winters and short summers, these forests and the animals that live in them are shifting northward as temperatures rise.

However, boreal forests’ northward advance has been spotty and slower than expected. Meanwhile, their southern retreat has been faster than scientists predicted. As scholars who study northern ecosystems, forests and wetlands, we see concerning evidence that as the world warms, its largest forest wilderness appears to be shrinking.

The largest wilderness on Earth
Boreal forests contain billions of trees. Most are needleleaf, cone-bearing conifers, but there also are patches of broadleaf species, including birch, aspen and poplar. They support millions of migratory birds and iconic mammals like brown bears, moose and lynx.

These trees and the soils around their roots help regulate Earth’s climate, in part by pulling carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, where it would otherwise act as a greenhouse gas. The trees use this carbon to grow roots, trunks and leaves, which eventually turn into carbon-rich soil once the tree dies. Significant changes to the forests will translate to changes in global climate.

These forests are warming at rates well above the global average. Rising temperatures directly affect the growth and survival of trees and, in turn, their ability to store carbon.

Forests on the move
As atmospheric warming frees trees from the icy grip of cold temperatures, adult trees can respond by growing faster. Milder temperatures also allow young seedling trees in the most northern boreal forests to gain a foothold where previous conditions were too harsh for them to become established.

In the warmer, southern boreal forests, the situation is quite different. Here, conditions have become too warm for cold-adapted boreal trees, slowing their growth and even leading to their death. With warming comes dryness, and water stress leaves trees more susceptible to insect infestation and fires, as Canada has experienced in 2023 and Siberia in 2019 and 2020.

If this happens at a larger scale, southern boreal forest boundaries will thin and degrade, thereby retreating farther north, where temperatures are still suitable.

If boreal forests expand northward and retreat in the south at the same rates, they could slowly follow warming temperatures. However, our combined research using satellite and field data shows that the story is more complex.

...

Our recent studies using satellite data showed that tree growth and tree cover increased from 2000 to 2019 throughout much of the boreal forest. These changes occurred mainly in the coldest northern areas. However, there was limited evidence to indicate that forests were expanding past current tree lines.

Our studies also revealed that tree growth and tree cover often decreased from 2000 to 2019 in warmer southern areas of the boreal forests. In these regions, hotter and drier conditions frequently reduced tree growth or killed individual trees, while wildfires and logging contributed to tree cover loss.

Zooming in to understand forest change
Forests advance when individual tree seeds germinate and grow, but boreal trees grow slowly and require decades to reach a size that’s visible from space. Finding young trees whose presence would signal tree-line movement requires data from the ground.

In the late 1970s, one of us (David Cooper) documented that young spruce trees were growing at altitudes hundreds of yards higher and locations miles north of the highest-elevation cone-bearing trees in Alaska’s Brooks Range. Returning in 2021, we found those little trees had grown to be several yards tall and were producing cones. More importantly, 10 times the number of young spruces now grow above and beyond the tree line than during our first field forays.

Crisscrossing the boundary between Alaska’s boreal forest and its Arctic tundra on foot, we have found thousands of young boreal trees growing up to 25 miles north of established tree lines. Most grow where deeper snows fall, due to an Arctic Ocean version of the “lake effect”: Cold air moves across open water, picking up warmth and moisture, which then falls as snow downwind.

Retreating sea ice leaves more open water. This generates stronger winds that propel tree seeds farther and more snowfall that insulates seedlings from harsh winter conditions. The result is that trees in Alaska’s Brooks Range are rapidly moving into the treeless tundra. However, these rapid expansions are localized and do not yet happen everywhere along the northern tree line.

The future face of boreal forests
Our combined research shows that boreal forests are, in fact, responding to rising temperatures. But rapid rates of climatic change mean that trees likely can’t move northward at a pace that keeps up with their loss in the south.

Will trees in the far north ever catch up with climate and prevent forest contraction? At this point, scientists simply don’t know. Perhaps the newly established trees in the Brooks Range herald such an expansion. It’s also unclear whether the northern parts of boreal forests can accumulate enough carbon through increased growth to compensate for carbon losses in the south.

...

https://theconversation.com/the-worlds-boreal-forests-may-be-shrinking-as-climate-change-pushes-them-northward-211314

Since the trees grow slowly the gains won´t be enough.
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #610 on: November 04, 2023, 10:44:23 AM »
The kids aren't alright: Saplings reveal how changing climate may undermine forests

s climate scientist Don Falk was hiking through a forest, the old, green pines stretched overhead. But he had the feeling that something was missing. Then his eyes found it: a seedling, brittle and brown, overlooked because of its lifelessness. Once Falk's eyes found one, the others quickly fell into his awareness. An entire generation of young trees had died.

Falk – a professor in the UArizona School of Natural Resources and the Environment, with joint appointments in the Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research and the Arizona Institute for Resilience – refers to this large-scale die-off of the younger generation of trees as a recruitment failure. This is particularly devastating for a population of trees because the youngest are essential for forest recovery following massive die-off events, such as severe wildfires and insect outbreaks, both of which will become more frequent as the climate continues to change, he said.

To better understand how extreme climate conditions might trigger recruitment failure, Falk and his co-authors examined how five species of 4-year-old trees responded to extended drought and heat.

They found that different species had different levels of drought tolerance and that all species were more tolerant of the heat wave than expected. Their findings were published in the journal Frontiers in Forests and Global Change.

In general, older trees are more tolerant of tougher conditions, Falk said. But when there are massive die-off events – which can be caused by drought and heat, sometimes with associated insects, pathogens or wildfire – tree populations become dependent on their ability to regenerate.

"When scientists make models about future tree growth based on the conditions an adult tree can tolerate, it might not accurately reflect the future of the forests," Falk said. "That's why we focused on this seedling bottleneck."

The team gathered trees from across five species found at various elevations in the Jemez Mountains of New Mexico. From lowest elevation to highest, this included ponderosa pine, piñon pine, Englemann spruce, Douglas fir and limber pine. They then exposed the young trees to drought and heat conditions in a growth chamber, which allowed them to precisely control temperature, humidity, light and water.

In the first round of the experiment, the team maintained the normal average temperature for each species and simply stopped watering the plants to test their response to drought conditions.

"About 8 weeks out, pretty much every tree was still dealing with it," Falk said. "But then, as the drought got on to 12 and 14 weeks, the ponderosa pine seedlings started to die, and then the piñon seedlings started to die off, then the Engelmann spruce, and the Douglas fir. The ones that lasted longest, which really surprised us (lasting 36 weeks without water) was limber pine."

"You would think that the species that live at lower, warmer elevations would be more drought adapted than trees living at the higher elevation," Falk said. "But the higher elevation trees – the Douglas fir and limber pine – grow in the coolest temperatures and lived the longest. It appears that the trees are only as drought tolerant as they need to be. As climate change progresses, it will put more stress on the trees, and then there'll probably be selection for those more drought- tolerant traits."

Next, the team simulated an average heat wave by cranking up the temperature by 10 degrees for all species for one week.

As a result, each species died out in the exact same order, and died only slightly sooner.

"These results surprised me in a couple of ways," said co-author and UArizona professor emeritus David Breshears. "First, heat waves do indeed matter, but I expected them to have a larger effect than they did. So, they're important, but the underlying drought and average warming seem to be the key drivers. Second, we found limber pine was the heartiest species and this has important implications for how our landscapes are likely to change."

...

https://www.newswise.com/articles/young-trees-show-how-climate-change-could-harm-forests-future
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #611 on: November 12, 2023, 08:39:09 PM »
Lightning fires threaten planet-cooling forests

Climate change could bring more lightning to forests in northern reaches of the globe, increasing the risk of wildfires, a new study shows.

Researchers found that lightning is the main cause of fires similar to those seen in parts of Canada this summer.

These forests limit climate change by trapping planet-heating carbon.

More lightning could spark a vicious cycle, as trees and soil set ablaze release warming CO2 - creating more storms and potentially more lightning.

While the overall number of fires has decreased around the world over the last two decades, they have increased markedly in heavily forested areas outside the tropics.

This year Canada experienced a fire season like no other - over 6,500 fires blazed, burning around 18 million hectares (45 million acres) of forest and land.

Smoke from those fires drifted into major cities in Canada and the US, even crossing the Atlantic to Spain and Portugal.

Unlike other years which saw fires confined to the western part of the country, 2023 was marked by conflagrations across the entire territory including in eastern regions like Quebec.

The majority of these fires in northern parts were started by lightning strikes according to experts.

This new study used machine learning tools to develop a new global map showing forest fires by their ignition sources.

The authors found that 77% of burned areas in these forests are related to lightning ignitions. This is very different from tropical regions where humans are the main cause.

...

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-67360140
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #612 on: November 15, 2023, 08:47:22 AM »
Diverse forests hold huge carbon potential, as long as we cut emissions


Research results published in the journal, Nature, show that realistic global forest carbon potential is approximately 226 Gigatonnes (Gt) of carbon. The study, which involved hundreds of scientists around the world, highlights the critical importance of forest conservation, restoration, and sustainable management in moving towards international climate and biodiversity targets. The researchers stress that this potential can be achieved by incentivizing community-driven efforts to promote biodiversity.

The forest carbon potential has been a highly controversial topic. Four years ago, a study published in the journal Science found that the restoration of forests could capture over 200 Gt of carbon -- which could draw down approximately 30 percent of excess anthropogenic carbon. While this study elevated a discussion about the role of nature in fighting climate change, it also raised concerns around the adverse environmental impacts of mass tree plantations, carbon offsetting schemes, and greenwashing. While some scientific studies have supported the scale of this finding, others argued that this forest carbon estimate could be up to 4 or 5 times too high.

...

Due to ongoing deforestation, the total amount of carbon stored in forests is ~328 Gt below its natural state. Of course, much of this land is used for extensive human development including urban and agricultural land. However, outside of those areas, researchers found that forests could capture approximately 226 Gt C in regions with a low human footprint if they were allowed to recover. Approximately 61 percent of this potential can be achieved by protecting existing forests, so that they can recover to maturity. The remaining 39 percent can be achieved by reconnecting fragmented forest landscapes through sustainable ecosystem management and restoration.

"Most of the world's forests are highly degraded. In fact, many people have never been in one of the few old growth forests that remain on Earth," said Lidong Mo, a lead author of the study. "To restore global biodiversity, ending deforestation must be a top priority."

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/11/231113111644.htm

So far, humans have removed almost half of Earth's natural forests, and we continue to lose a further 0.9 to 2.3 Gt C each year (about 15% of annual human carbon emissions) through deforestation.

https://www.natureworldnews.com/articles/59457/20231114/226-gigatons-carbon-sequestered-allowing-trees-grow-old-study-finds.htm
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #613 on: November 20, 2023, 05:03:51 PM »
Fire is consuming more of the world's forests than ever before, threatening supplies of wood, paper


A third of the world's forests are cut for timber. This generates US$1.5 trillion annually. But wildfire threatens industries such as timber milling and paper manufacturing, and the threat is far greater than most people realize.

Our research, published today in the journal Nature Geoscience, shows that between 2001 and 2021, severe wildfires worldwide destroyed timber-producing forests equivalent to an area the size of Great Britain. Severe fires reach the tree tops and consume the forest canopy.

The amount of timber-producing forest burning each year in severe wildfires has increased significantly in the past decade. The western United States, Canada, Siberia, Brazil and Australia have been most affected.

Timber demand is expected to almost triple by 2050. Supplying demand is clearly going to be challenging. Our research highlights the need to urgently adopt new management strategies and emerging technologies to combat the increasing threat of wildfires.

What we found
We combined global maps of logging activity and severe wildfires to determine how much timber-producing forest was lost to wildfire this century. Between 2001 and 2021, up to 25 million hectares of timber-producing forest was severely burned. The extent of fire has jumped markedly in the past decade, from an average of less than one million hectares a year up to 2015 to triple that since then.

At a national scale, the three countries with the largest absolute wildfire-induced losses of timber-producing forest were Russia, the US and Canada. When it comes to proportion of their forestry land lost, the nations with the highest percentages burnt were Portugal, followed by Australia.

Why are more forests burning?
Climate change is a major driver of fire weather and fire behavior. The increased risk of high-severity wildfire is an entirely expected outcome of warmer temperatures and, in some places, reduced rainfall.

However, it remains unclear why so much wood-production forest is being lost, and why the increase in burnt area has been so marked in the past decade.

One possible reason is logging makes forests more flammable. This has been documented in parts of southeastern Australia, where intact forest always burnt at lower severity than harvested forest across the entire footprint of the Black Summer fires. Forests that have been subject to thinning also are at risk of high-severity wildfire.

... and more

https://phys.org/news/2023-11-consuming-world-forests-threatening-wood.html
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #614 on: November 21, 2023, 10:16:54 AM »
We’re burning too much fossil fuel to fix by planting trees – making ‘net zero’ emissions impossible with offsets


The idea that we can mitigate current carbon emissions by “offsetting” them with carbon reduction initiatives elsewhere has become central to government and business responses to climate change. But it’s an idea we need to seriously question.

Essentially, the offsetting strategy assumes the release of carbon stored by ancient biology a hundred million years ago can be mitigated in the current active carbon cycle. Since the Kyoto protocol was signed, offsetting has become the preferred option globally.

The concept of “net zero” carbon emissions is also at the heart of New Zealand’s official climate response and its Emissions Trading Scheme.

How this might change under a new government is hard to predict, with the different positions held by the negotiating parties potentially leading to a “coalition of climate chaos”, according to one commentator.

At one level, net zero makes sense. Planting trees to mitigate the effects of forest clearance – or to provide shade, stabilise land and enhance biodiversity – means carbon in the atmosphere can be sequestered where it otherwise would not be.

But that doesn’t automatically mean the planet can absorb all the fossil carbon human industry continues to release. The idea that harm done in the present can be “offset” somewhere else in the future – something also seen in the field of freshwater ecology – cannot be taken at face value.

How the carbon cycle works
To put things in perspective, global carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels are currently around 10 billion tonnes per year. If we continue emitting at this rate, total fossil fuel emissions from now to 2050 will be about 280 billion tonnes – seven times larger than the maximum estimated biological carbon sequestration of 38 billion tonnes from 2015 to 2050.

Before humans began extracting fossil fuels, carbon cycled in a dynamic equilibrium: the total amount of carbon entering each carbon pool was balanced by the total amount of carbon leaving, so the amount of carbon stored did not change.

Then, beginning with coal and later oil and gas, carbon stored over millennia prior to 65 million years ago has been unlocked and released.

Despite its ancient origins, this fossil carbon is “new” carbon being added to the current active land-atmosphere-ocean carbon cycle. The reality is that the long-term storage of carbon in plants, soils, geologic formations and the ocean can only mitigate carbon from the current carbon cycle – not any extra fossil carbon.

...

https://theconversation.com/were-burning-too-much-fossil-fuel-to-fix-by-planting-trees-making-net-zero-emissions-impossible-with-offsets-217437
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #615 on: December 16, 2023, 02:25:47 PM »
Trees in wetter regions more sensitive to drought

...

Scientists have long debated whether arid conditions make trees more or less resilient to drought.

It seems intuitive that trees living at their biological limits will be most vulnerable to climate change, since even just a little extra stress could tip them past the brink.

On the other hand, these populations have adapted to a harsher setting, so they might be more capable of withstanding a drought.

According to a new study in the journal Science by researchers at UC Santa Barbara and UC Davis, greater water availability could "spoil" trees by reducing their adaptations to drought.

"And that's really critical to understand when we're thinking about the global vulnerability of forest carbon stocks and forest health," said ecologist Joan Dudney, an assistant professor at UCSB's Bren School of Environmental Science & Management and in the Environmental Studies Program.

"You don't want to be a 'spoiled' tree when facing a major drought."

Dudney and her co-authors expected trees growing in the most arid regions to be more sensitive to drought, since they're already living at the edge of their limits.

What's more, climate change models predict that these regions will experience more rapid drying than wetter regions.

This shift in climate could expose trees to conditions beyond their adaptive capacity.

To measure drought sensitivity, the authors analyzed 6.6 million tree ring samples from 122 species worldwide.

For each year, they measured whether the tree grew faster or slower than average based on its ring width.

They linked these trends with historic climate data, including precipitation and temperature.

The team then compared drought responses across different regions.

"As you move to the drier edge of a species' range, trees become less and less sensitive to drought," said lead author Robert Heilmayr, an environmental economist also in the Environmental Studies Program and at the Bren School.

"Those trees are actually quite resilient."

Dudney, Heilmayr and their co-author Frances Moore were inspired, in part, by the work of UCSB professor Tamma Carleton on the effects climate change has on human populations.

"This paper highlights the value of cross-disciplinary scientific work," added Moore, an associate professor at UC Davis.

"We were able to adapt methods from economics originally developed to study how people and businesses adjust to a changing climate and apply them to the ecological context to study forest sensitivity to drought."

"A heatwave is likely to kill more people in a cool place like Seattle than in hotter cities like Phoenix," Heilmayr said.

The Southwest is already quite hot, so heatwaves there are scorching.

But the region's cities are adapted to an extreme climate, he points out.

Now we know that forests display similar trends.

Unfortunately, warmer regions are slated to get disproportionately drier in the coming decades.

"There is a pretty large portion of species' ranges that are going to face a completely novel climate, something that those species don't see anywhere in their range today," Heilmayr explained.

The authors found that 11% of an average species' range in 2100 will be drier than the driest parts of their historic range.

This increases to over 50% for some species.

"Broadly, our research highlights that very few forests will be unaffected by climate change," Dudney said.

"Even wetter forests are more threatened than we thought."

But there is a flip side of the coin. Species have a reservoir of drought-hearty stock in the drier parts of their range that could bolster forests in wetter areas.

Previous research out of UCSB revealed that many species do have the capacity to adapt to environmental change.

However, those researchers also found that trees migrate slowly from one generation to the next.

That means human intervention -- such as assisted migration -- may be necessary in order to take advantage of this genetic diversity.

...

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/12/231213133454.htm
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #616 on: December 18, 2023, 02:32:15 PM »
Brazil’s “End-of-the-World” auction for oil and gas drilling (commentary)

Brazil’s massive 13 December 2023 auction of oil and gas drilling rights betrays a glaring hypocrisy in view of the country’s discourse on climate change. The fossil fuels to be extracted would be a climate-change “bomb”. They also signal no intent to end extraction soon.

The auctioned areas impact Indigenous and other traditional peoples, Amazonian protected areas for biodiversity, coral reefs and marine biodiversity hotspots. Areas still “under study” for future auctions include the vital Trans-Purus rainforest area in Brazil’s state of Amazonas.

Brazil’s President Lula needs to control his anti-environmental ministers and replace some of them, such as the minister of mines and energy.

An earlier version of this text was published in Portuguese by Amazônia Real. This is a commentary and does not necessarily reflect the views of Mongabay.


...

One day after the end of the COP28 climate summit, Brazil’s National Petroleum Agency (ANP) conducted what is known as the “End-of-the-World” auction, selling off drilling rights in 602 new exploration areas, including 21 in the Amazon River basin. More than half (12 blocks) are located in areas that directly impact up to 20 Indigenous lands and the buffer zones of at least 15 conservation units (protected areas for biodiversity. Also included are blocks affecting demarcated quilombola territories, which are areas inhabited by the descendants of Africans who escaped from slavery in past centuries; quilombolas have the same rights as Indigenous peoples under Brazil’s constitution.

...

https://news.mongabay.com/2023/12/brazils-end-of-the-world-auction-for-oil-and-gas-drilling-commentary/

Protecting the rain forest only goes so far...
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #617 on: December 19, 2023, 06:09:57 PM »
Fungi and future forest health

New research from Stanford suggests climate change will disrupt many age-old partnerships between aspen trees and fungi that are essential to healthy forests.

...

Recent research from Stanford University suggests climate change will disrupt the balance between helpful and harmful fungi in Populus groves, as rising temperatures and shifting precipitation patterns lead to fewer kinds of beneficial soil and root fungi in drier regions and encourage growth of potentially pathogenic leaf fungi in wetter areas.   

...

The new study catalogs the diversity of fungi associated with five Populus species at 94 groves in 21 states, building on more than a decade of work by the Peay Lab at Stanford to map fungal diversity and understand its relationship to the future of forests. The study, published Nov. 16 in Nature Microbiology, also predicts how different groups of fungi associated with Populus trees will respond to climate change – expanding on past research from the group focused on symbiotic microbes in pine forests.

In extremely dry places like the deserts of the U.S. southwest, the authors found the trees tended to have a unique species of mycorrhizal fungus, which connects to a plant’s roots and helps it obtain water and nutrients. As they simulated more extreme temperatures and droughts predicted under climate change in these areas, the abundance of mycorrhizal fungi increased, suggesting that the trees may get extra help from fungi to quench their thirst when water is scarce. But the array of mycorrhizal fungus species in these parched environments was far less diverse than in more moderate climates, and is predicted to drop even further if temperatures rise.

The results suggest that as global warming brings increasingly hot and dry weather to the southwest, vulnerable Populus trees may be left with fewer fungal symbionts to choose from. Fungi tend to prefer more humid environments, so it’s likely that many species won’t be able to handle the lack of moisture.

...

https://sustainability.stanford.edu/news/fungi-and-future-forest-health
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #618 on: January 02, 2024, 04:53:26 PM »
The year in rainforests: 2023

The following is Mongabay’s annual recap of major tropical rainforest storylines.

While the data is still preliminary, it appears that deforestation declined across the tropics as a whole in 2023 due to developments in the Amazon, which has more than half the world’s remaining primary tropical forests.

Some of the other big storylines for the year: Lula prioritizes the Amazon; droughts in the Amazon and Indonsia; Indonesia holds the line on deforestation despite el Niño; regulation on imports of forest-risk commodities; an eventful year in the forest carbon market; rainforests and Indigenous peoples; and rampant illegality.

https://news.mongabay.com/2023/12/the-year-in-rainforests-2023/
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

vox_mundi

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 10233
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 3517
  • Likes Given: 754
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #619 on: January 02, 2024, 08:10:21 PM »
“There are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.” ― anonymous

Insensible before the wave so soon released by callous fate. Affected most, they understand the least, and understanding, when it comes, invariably arrives too late

vox_mundi

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 10233
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 3517
  • Likes Given: 754
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #620 on: January 16, 2024, 10:37:05 PM »
More Than 80% of Tree Species Endemic to the Atlantic Rainforest Are Threatened With Extinction, Finds Study
https://phys.org/news/2024-01-tree-species-endemic-atlantic-rainforest.html

A study led by Brazilian researchers and reported in an article published on January 11 in the journal Science shows that 82% of the more than 2,000 species of trees found only in the Atlantic Rainforest biome are threatened with extinction to some degree, while 65% of all 4,950 tree species present in the biome, including non-endemics, are endangered.

"The number [82% of endemic species threatened] came as a shock. We took forest availability into account for each species, whether or not it was healthy forest, for example. Not all species are able to survive in degraded fragments, so the actual situation may be even more alarming," said Renato Lima, corresponding author of the article.
Another troubling discovery was that population decline in the last three generations was less than 30% for only 7% of the endemics. Species with a decline of 30%–50% in ten years or three generations are classified as Vulnerable, IUCN's lowest level of threat. Above this level, they are Endangered or Critically Endangered.

Among the threatened species, 75% were in the Endangered category. The emblematic brazilwood, Paubrasilia echinata, was considered Critically Endangered owing to an estimated 84% decline in population size over the past three generations.

Once common species, such as Araucaria angustifolia (Paraná pine), Euterpe edulis (Jussara palm) and Ilex paraguariensis (Yerba mate), have lost at least 50% of their populations and are classified as Endangered.

Species endemic to the Atlantic Rainforest, such as Brazilian sassafras (Ocotea odorifera) and Brazilian walnut (Ocotea porosa), have lost 53%-89%, and are listed as Endangered or Critically Endangered.

... The authors advocate global use of the methodology. In a simulation based on data for other tropical forests, they found that 30%–35% of the planet's tree species may be threatened by deforestation alone.

Renato A.F. De Lima et al, Comprehensive conservation assessments reveal high extinction risks across Atlantic Forest trees, Science (2024).
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq5099
“There are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.” ― anonymous

Insensible before the wave so soon released by callous fate. Affected most, they understand the least, and understanding, when it comes, invariably arrives too late

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20581
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5304
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #621 on: January 25, 2024, 06:26:09 PM »
Things going awry under Lula in the Amazon?

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/25/optimism-dries-up-amazon-lula-drifts-climate-priorities-brazil
Quote
Optimism dries up in Amazon as Lula drifts from climate priorities
Brazil’s president inspired hope a year ago but approval of a new highway shows he remains a concrete-and-oil state builder

by Jonathan Watts
Thu 25 Jan 2024 13.00 GMT
What a difference a year makes in the Brazilian Amazon. At the start of 2023, I wrote about the green shoots of the rainy season and feelings of hope inspired by the new president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who promised to strengthen Indigenous rights and aim for zero deforestation. Twelve months on, both the vegetation and political optimism are drying up.

The most severe drought in living memory has finally been broken, but the rains are late and weak compared with previous years. The Xingu River is far lower than normal for January. The pulse of forest growth is also fainter – the new vegetation does not push out as far into the road as it did last January. The neighbouring cattle pasture is faring even worse. The forage grasses, known as capim, were so severely burned that they have not grown back, leaving the hillsides brown and the cows emaciated. Several of the poor, skeletal beasts have escaped their fields and wandered towards our community in search of food. Local people say more than a dozen cows have died of starvation at this one ranch, and countless others elsewhere.

Less obvious, but in many ways more worrying, is the dearth of leafcutter ants. These large-mandibled insects are usually everywhere, slicing and carrying vegetation in columns to create fungal gardens in their nests, which spread out over dozens of metres in Gaudi-esque towers and mounds. Entomologists say these ants have the second most-complex societies on Earth, after humans, and they are the dominant herbivores in the South American tropics, trimming about a sixth of all the leaves produced in the forest. This stimulates new plant growth and enriches the soil. Not for nothing have these ants been described as ecosystem engineers.

Each day, I pass three big nests of leafcutters on my daily walk with the dogs. Just over a year ago, I ventured too close during the annual revoada, when the winged females set out on their nuptial flights followed by clouds of males. It is a sensitive time for the insects and the soldier ants were in fiercely protective mode. I was driven away with my foot bloodied and me howling with pain. Despite this, I have never ceased to admire these tiny, powerful creatures so I was dismayed to discover that all four nests are apparently lifeless. The mounds appear deflated, there is no newly excavated soil at the entrances, and not a single leafcutter ant to be seen. This is bizarre as a healthy colony can have 3.5 million members and they never previously stopped working. Entomologists tell me they may have relocated or been wiped out by the prolonged dry season. It is an alarming reminder that the weakening of forest resilience takes many forms and the impact of the drought remains incalculable.

Human-caused global heating and deforestation are parching the forest – and not just over the last year. Scientists have found the Amazonian dry season is getting hotter, drier and longer. Fifty years ago, it lasted four months. Now, it is five. This is causing a die-back of trees and other species that are being pushed beyond their survival thresholds. An ecosystem-wide collapse that would turn the Amazon into a savanna draws ever closer.

Lula knows this. In a speech at Cop28 in Dubai last November he told the world he was shocked that the region’s rivers, which are the greatest freshwater source in the world, are at their lowest level for more than 120 years. He said this was a global climate problem and called on other countries to make a greater effort. “Even if we do not cut down any more trees, the Amazon could reach its point of no return if other countries do not do their part.”

But his own government’s efforts to protect the forest and its people have been mixed. A first-year report card for Lula would show progress compared with the low benchmark set by the previous far-right administration of Jair Bolsonaro, but also failed promises, political weakness and worrying signs of regression.

First, the all-important good news. Deforestation in the Amazon has slowed by about 50% over the past year. For the first time since 2018, the clearance rate was less than 10,000 sq km in the 12 months until 31 July. Still more encouraging, the loss of tree cover in Indigenous territories fell by 73%.

The bad news is that, even with this deceleration, on average close to 1 million trees are still being chopped down or burned every day in the Amazon. Countless more died because of the drought and this will worsen the degradation of the forest. Overall, there is no doubt the Amazon finished 2023 in a worse condition than it started, though sadly that has been the case for every year in the past half century.

There are other causes for concern. The Amazon’s southern neighbour, the Cerrado savanna, suffered the largest devastation since 2016 as a result of the expansion of soy plantations and cattle ranching. This repeats the public relations ruse of earlier Lula administrations, which reduced deforestation in the globally centre-stage Amazon, while giving a green light to destruction of the important but lesser known Cerrado.

It is a similar story for Indigenous rights. Lula was a true pioneer in creating a separate ministry for this and his government has recognised six new territories, which numerous studies have shown is the most cost-effective way of conserving forest and sequestering carbon.

Yet, he has been outmanoeuvred by a hostile congress, which has passed a new law, known as Marco Temporal, to limit Indigenous land approval.

This is not the only challenge to the president’s authority. A year ago, Lula faced down an attempted coup by Bolsonaro supporters, including elements of the police. The army sat on the fence, which was hardly a vote of confidence. Since then, the military has neglected to support the government’s efforts to remove thousands of illegal gold miners from Yanomami territory. As a result, the Lula administration has lost control over those lands and failed to alleviate a humanitarian disaster. Although the government spent $200m (£155m) and mobilised 2,000 healthcare workers to the region, 308 Yanomami died from preventable diseases between January and November – little different from the toll during Bolsonaro’s last year in office.

Meanwhile, a new and still greater threat is emerging in the shape of a paved highway through the heart of the western Amazon. The planned BR-319 upgrade from Manaus to Porto Velho would devastate one of the last great, relatively undisturbed areas of the rainforest because roads have always been precursors to illegal logging, mining, land clearance and invasions of Indigenous lands. The project has been resisted for many years on the basis of expert scientific advice. But last month, lawmakers – with the support of the construction and agribusiness lobbies – passed a bill to dilute environmental licensing requirements for the road, which they have declared a “priority infrastructure necessary for national security”. Lula has effectively given the go-ahead by setting up a BR-319 working group and sidelining the environment ministry in the process.

In a remarkable example of Orwellian newspeak, his transport minister, Renan Filho, says the project will build the “most sustainable and greenest highway on the planet”. He is also seeking project financing from the $1.2bn Amazon fund, which was set up by Norway, with additional commitments from Britain, Germany and the US, to reduce deforestation and promote sustainability. The BR-319 is a flagrant contradiction of those goals. Making such a request makes a mockery of the international fund and the Brazilian government’s environmental credibility. It is a bad joke, not least because one of the goals of the new road is to facilitate oil and gas exploration deep inside the forest, in addition to existing exploration near the mouth of the Amazon. It is the same shortsighted race to cash in on petroleum that is seen in the US, the UK, Canada, Russia, Norway and other petrol-producing nations.

Lula cannot seem to decide what kind of leader he wants to be. To a global audience, he speaks of the modern need for climate action and promises zero deforestation. But to his domestic electorate, he remains an old-fashioned concrete-and-oil state builder. Compared with last year, there is no doubt he is drifting – or being pushed – ever further away from science and Indigenous rights, and ever closer to business and capitalist extractivism. Given Lula’s weak political position and ideological instincts, it is not hard to understand why. But as a response to record droughts and increasingly deadly weather events, it feels more like a surrender than a compromise.

In the Amazon, the climate crisis is hitting hard. As welcome as the slowdown in deforestation has been, it is not enough and even this is threatened by new roads and oil projects. If the political drift continues, it will not be just the trees, the cows and the ants that start to die off.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1764
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 218
  • Likes Given: 128
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #622 on: February 07, 2024, 07:18:37 AM »
 Poorer Countries Face Heavier Consequences of Climate Change

As forests shift to higher latitudes, nations reckon with losses of both market and nonmarket ecosystem benefits.

Forest biomes are on the move because of climate change, and nations from Albania to Zimbabwe will experience shifts in economic production and ecosystem-provided benefits as vegetation cover relocates—or disappears entirely. Countries could lose 1.3% of their GDP (gross domestic product), on average, according to new research. And poorer nations will face proportionally larger losses.

An ongoing poleward shift in vegetation, likely to persist into the future, has implications for natural resources such as timber, said Bernie Bastien-Olvera, a climate scientist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego. “As forests migrate towards higher latitudes, many countries are losing forest cover.
(more)

https://eos.org/articles/poorer-countries-face-heavier-consequences-of-climate-change

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #623 on: February 07, 2024, 09:27:02 PM »
Good plan:

Devon tree planting: Work to recreate lost rainforest

The National Trust plans to create vast new areas of temperate rainforest in the south-west of England.

More than 100,000 trees will be planted in north Devon to create swathes of humid woodland that will be home to plants facing extinction.

Experts say the area's heavy rainfall and high humidity levels provide a unique moisture-rich environment.

Other projects to recreate the lost rainforests of Britain are already ongoing.

Temperate rainforests once covered large areas of the western coast of Britain.

...

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-devon-68127144

But what happens if the funding does not keep up:

‘We’ll have to burn millions of trees after cuts'

Ronald Christie has 130 million trees growing on his nursery in Moray but fears many will have to be destroyed because of cuts to government funding.

The seedlings were being grown for new woodlands as part of the Scottish government's expanding forestry targets, which are critical for tackling climate change.

But with the budget now being slashed, Mr Christie predicts the market will dry up leaving skilled workers out of jobs.

He wants ministers to rethink cuts which he believes will damage the sector long-term.

As part of its climate change commitments, the Scottish government is meant to be increasing tree-planting to 18,000 hectares annually from this year, a target would involve about 28 million trees across an area about three times the size of Dundee.

However, it was announced in the December budget that funding was being cut by 41%, from £77.2m to £45.4m.

Ministers have admitted this is likely to mean only 9,000 hectares being planted in the year from April.

Mr Christie, the owner of Christies of Fochabers, which has operated for 200 years, described the cuts as an "absolute shocker".

He said: "We've been encouraged to grow trees by the government to reach this target of 18,000 hectares.

"To grow trees takes a three-year cycle and unless we're told in the next few weeks if there is funding available, this whole lot will have to be destroyed."

He said that would amount to about 10 million tree seedings being ripped up and burnt with perhaps the same happening again next year if the funding allocation remains the same.

This includes Caledonian pine - which he said costs about £3,000 per kg for seed.

...

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-68133750
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1764
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 218
  • Likes Given: 128
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #624 on: February 17, 2024, 11:40:21 PM »
 Very cool: trees stalling effects of global heating in eastern US, study finds

Vast reforestation a major reason for ‘warming hole’ across parts of US where temperatures have flatlined or cooled

(...)
A major reason for this anomaly, the new study finds, is the vast reforestation of much of the eastern US following the initial loss of large numbers of trees in the wake of European settlement in America. Such large expanses have been reforested in the past century – with enough trees sprouting back to cover an area larger than England – that it has helped stall the affect of global heating.

“The reforestation has been remarkable and we have shown this has translated into the surrounding air temperature,” said Mallory Barnes, an environmental scientist at Indiana University who led the research. “The ‘warming hole’ has been a real mystery and while this doesn’t explain all of it, this research shows there is a really important link to the trees coming back.”

There was a surge in deforestation from the start of the US’s early colonial history, as woodland was razed for agriculture and housing, but this began to reverse from around the 1920s as more people began to move into cities, leaving marginal land to become populated again with trees. The US government, meanwhile, embarked upon an aggressive tree-planting program, with these factors leading to about 15m hectares of reforested area in the past century in the eastern US.
(more)

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/feb/17/us-east-trees-warming-hole-study-climate-crisis

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #625 on: February 19, 2024, 12:13:03 PM »
That is one of those ecoservices nature provides.  :)


Trees struggle to 'breathe' as climate warms


Trees are struggling to sequester heat-trapping carbon dioxide (CO2) in warmer, drier climates, meaning that they may no longer serve as a solution for offsetting humanity's carbon footprint as the planet continues to warm, according to a new study led by Penn State researchers.

"We found that trees in warmer, drier climates are essentially coughing instead of breathing," said Max Lloyd assistant research professor of geosciences at Penn State and lead author on the study recently published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "They are sending CO2 right back into the atmosphere far more than trees in cooler, wetter conditions."

Through the process of photosynthesis, trees remove CO2 from the atmosphere to produce new growth. Yet, under stressful conditions, trees release CO2 back to the atmosphere, a process called photorespiration. With an analysis of a global dataset of tree tissue, the research team demonstrated that the rate of photorespiration is up to two times higher in warmer climates, especially when water is limited. They found the threshold for this response in subtropical climates begins to be crossed when average daytime temperatures exceed roughly 68 degrees Fahrenheit and worsens as temperatures rise further.

The results complicate a widespread belief about the role of plants in helping to draw down, or use, carbon from the atmosphere, providing new insight into how plants could adapt to climate change. Importantly, the researchers noted that as the climate warms, their findings demonstrate that plants could be less able to draw CO2 out of the atmosphere and assimilate the carbon necessary to help the planet cool down.

"We have knocked this essential cycle off balance," Lloyd said. "Plants and climate are inextricably linked. The biggest draw down of CO2 from our atmosphere is photosynthesizing organisms. It's a big knob on the composition of the atmosphere, so that means small changes have a large impact."

Plants currently absorb an estimated 25% of the CO2 emitted by human activities each year, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, but this percentage is likely to decrease in the future as the climate warms, Lloyd explained, especially if water is scarcer.

"When we think about climate futures, we predict that CO2 will go up, which in theory is good for plants because those are the molecules they breathe in," Lloyd said. "But we've shown there will be a tradeoff that some prevailing models don't account for. The world will be getting warmer, which means plants will be less able to draw down that CO2."

In the study, the researchers discovered that variation in the abundance of certain isotopes of a part of wood called methoxyl groups serves as a tracer of photorespiration in trees. You can think of isotopes as varieties of atoms, Lloyd explained. Just as you might have vanilla and chocolate versions of ice cream, atoms can have different isotopes with their own unique "flavors" due to variations in their mass. The team studied levels of the methoxyl "flavor" of isotope in wood samples from about thirty specimens of trees from a variety of climates and conditions throughout the world to observe trends in photorespiration. The specimens came from an archive at the University of California, Berkeley, that contains hundreds of wood samples collected in the 1930s and 40s.

"The database was originally used to train foresters how to identify trees from different places around the world, so we repurposed it to essentially reconstruct these forests to see how well they were taking in CO2," Lloyd said.

Until now, photorespiration rates could only be measured in real time using living plants or well-preserved dead specimens that retained structural carbohydrates, which meant that it was nearly impossible to study the rate at which plants draw down carbon at scale or in the past, Lloyd explained.

Now that the team has validated a way to observe photorespiration rate using wood, he said the method could offer researchers a tool for predicting the how well trees might "breathe" in future and how they fared in past climates.

The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is rapidly rising; it is already greater than at any time in the last 3.6 million years, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. But that period is relatively recent in geologic time, Lloyd explained.

The team will now work to unearth photorespiration rates in the ancient past, up to tens of millions of years ago, using fossilized wood. The methods will allow researchers to explicitly test existing hypotheses regarding the changing influence of plant photorespiration on climate over geologic time.

"I'm a geologist, I work in the past," Lloyd said. "So, if we're interested in these big questions about how this cycle worked when the climate was very different than today, we can't use living plants. We may have to go back millions of years to better understand what our future might look like."

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/01/240131183540.htm

68F is 20C
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #626 on: February 22, 2024, 10:14:16 AM »
Amazon Rainforest Could Face “Large-Scale Collapse” As Soon As 2050

Factors like increasingly long dry seasons, global warming, and deforestation could push the rainforest to "tipping point".

The Amazon rainforest could soon be reaching a tipping point, according to a new study, with a combination of human-induced pressures such as global warming and deforestation pushing it towards either partial or, in the worst-case scenario, total collapse, by 2050.

"We are approaching a potential large-scale tipping point, and we may be closer (both at local scales and across the whole system) than we previously thought," said lead author Bernardo Flores, speaking to Agence France-Presse.

To reach this conclusion, researchers took data from computer models and past observations to identify the five key stressors to the world’s biggest rainforest – global warming, annual rainfall, the intensity of rainfall seasonality, the length of the dry season, and deforestation.

They then analyzed these stressors to determine where their individual thresholds that could trigger local, regional, or total collapse might be, and at what point they could combine to produce a “tipping point”, where even a small stress could cause a drastic ecosystem shift.

It was the combination of triggers that the researchers found to be the real kicker; they estimated that by 2050, 10 to 47 percent of the Amazon rainforest would be exposed to enough compounding stresses that it could trigger “unexpected ecosystem transitions and potentially exacerbate regional climate change,” the authors write.

...

https://www.iflscience.com/amazon-rainforest-could-face-large-scale-collapse-as-soon-as-2050-73004

And a little further south:

Cerrado: Beef trade risks key Brazil ecosystem - campaigners

Beef production by three of the world's biggest meatpackers has been linked to illegal deforestation in Brazil's Cerrado, according to campaigners.

The savannah, which featured in Planet Earth III, hosts 5% of Earth's species and is a buffer against global warming.

In one part of the Cerrado, nearly half of the farms supplying the companies had cut down trees, the Global Witness investigation suggests.

The companies, JBS, Minerva and Marfrig said they acted in line with local law.

The Cerrado sits next to the Amazon but unlike its neighbouring habitat has not been afforded the same protections. An upcoming EU law to reduce the import of products from deforested land does not include much of the Cerrado, as it is not considered a forest under the legislation.

In the last year the rate of deforestation in the Amazon has halved whilst in the Cerrado it surged by 43% according to data from Brazilian space agency Inpe.

The Cerrado savannah is described by Sir David Attenborough in the BBC documentary series Planet Earth III as a "grassland paradise". It covers nearly a fifth of Brazil's territory and hosts 5% of the world's species, including more than 6,000 types of tree.

It is also a vital store of planet-warming carbon - it is estimated it holds 13.7 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide, which is more than China released last year.

For decades it has suffered deforestation, as land is cleared for agriculture and mining. But a new investigation from international environmental and human rights charity Global Witness, and exclusively shared with the BBC, reveals the extent to which this Cerrado deforestation is illegal and is being driven by the cattle trade.

...

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-68272643
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #627 on: February 29, 2024, 07:54:23 PM »
Drax: UK power station still burning rare forest wood

A power company that has received £6bn in UK green subsidies has kept burning wood from some of the world's most precious forests, the BBC has found.

Papers obtained by Panorama show Drax took timber from rare forests in Canada it had claimed were "no-go areas".

It comes as the government decides whether to give the firm's Yorkshire site billions more in environmental subsidies funded by energy bill payers.

Drax says its wood pellets are "sustainable and legally harvested".

...
All of the 6.5 million tonnes of wood pellets burned by Drax each year are produced overseas. Many come from Drax's 17 pellet plants in the US and Canada.

...

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-68381160
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1764
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 218
  • Likes Given: 128
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #628 on: March 01, 2024, 11:31:38 PM »
WOOD

Old vs. New Growth Trees and the Wood Products they Make

It’s true what they say, “they don’t make ‘em like they used to.” We know, because our company restores historic windows. Many of these windows are still working well after 100 years. Most brand-new windows will not be in service 100 years from now.

Why? Because wood windows made with “new wood” aren’t made like they used to be. Historic windows made with “old growth” wood, from trees 100 years ago, are the most durable windows there are.

The difference between old growth wood and new growth wood

The difference between old growth wood and new growth wood is like the difference between granite and paper. Old growth wood has better stability, durability and longevity. New growth wood and the windows they’re made of, begin to rot and warp after only twenty years.

“Virgin Wood” refers to first -cut wood, or wood harvested for the first time. As early America grew and expanded, we harvested wood from virgin forests as we moved west.  Wood harvesting started in New York, then Pennsylvania and into Ohio, then on to the Great Lakes region of Wisconsin and Minnesota. Tree harvesting then turned to the south and finally, after the early 1900’s out west. The virgin wood forest harvesting era lasts from the 1870’s into the 1940’s.

Wood growth 100 years apart.

The value of virgin growth wood is that it has grown very slowly over a long period of time. Because of this slow growth, the growth rings are very tight. Tight growth means more stability. In this photo there are 2 pieces of wood 100 years apart. The wood from 1918 has 20-25 growth rings per inch. The wood from 2018 has only 7. 

Stability isn’t the only advantage. This slow growth also yields more heartwood. Heart wood is the longest lasting part of the tree, whereas sap wood which will rot very quickly. Note too in the picture above, the wood from 1918 is all heart wood, the wood from 2018 is all sap wood.
(more)

https://hullworks.com/wood/

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #629 on: March 02, 2024, 06:31:44 PM »
Quote
The value of virgin growth wood is that it has grown very slowly over a long period of time. Because of this slow growth, the growth rings are very tight. Tight growth means more stability. In this photo there are 2 pieces of wood 100 years apart. The wood from 1918 has 20-25 growth rings per inch. The wood from 2018 has only 7.

This is of course caused by the increasing length of the growing season and several other factors. 
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

sidd

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6783
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1047
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #630 on: March 02, 2024, 11:08:37 PM »
This is very visible in the walnut/hemlock deadfall we cleared a couple years ago. I think i posted something about it at some point ...

None of that wood was grown for timbering. The deadfall was on the edge a patch of so called "500 year" floodplain which had once been in production, but was taken out of production more than a hundred years ago. The growth rings on younger trees were much more widely spaced than in the old growth.

We replaced with sycamores, river birch, willow and beech, all of those like their toes wet. Seem to be doing well so far.

sidd

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1764
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 218
  • Likes Given: 128
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #631 on: March 13, 2024, 10:22:51 PM »
Redwood trees are growing almost as fast in the UK as their Californian cousins – new study

(...)
My team’s new study is the first to look at the growth of giant sequoias in the UK – and they seem to be doing remarkably well. Trees at two of the three sites we studied matched the average growth rates of their counterparts in the US, where they come from. These remarkable trees are being planted in an effort to help absorb carbon, but perhaps more importantly they are becoming a striking and much-admired part of the UK landscape.

To live so long, giant sequoias have evolved to be extraordinarily resilient. In their native northern California, they occupy an ecological niche in mountainous terrain 1400 – 2100 metres above sea level.

Their thick spongy bark insulates against fire and disease and they can survive severe winters and arid summers. Despite these challenges these trees absorb and store CO₂ faster and in greater quantities than almost any other in the world, storing up to five times more carbon per hectare than even tropical rainforests. However, the changing climate means Californian giant sequoias are under threat from more frequent and extreme droughts and fires. More than 10% of the remaining population of around 80,000 wild trees were killed in a single fire in 2020 alone.
Tree giants from the US

What is much less well-known is that there are an estimated half a million sequoias (wild and planted) in England, dotted across the landscape. So how well are the UK giant sequoias doing? To try and answer this, my team used a technique called terrestrial laser scanning to measure the size and volume of giant sequoias.

Woman carrying baby stands next to base of giant trees

Sequoia national park in California, USA. My Good Images/Shutterstock

The laser sends out half a million pulses a second and if a pulse hits a tree, the 3D location of each “hit” is recorded precisely. This gives us a map of tree structure in unprecedented detail, which we can use to estimate volume and mass, effectively allowing us to estimate the tree’s weight. If we know how old the trees are, we can estimate how fast they are growing and accumulating carbon.

As part of a Master’s project with former student Ross Holland, and along with colleagues at Kew Royal Botanical Gardens, we measured giant sequoias across three sites - Benmore botanical gardens in Scotland, Kew Wakehurst in Sussex and Havering Country Park in Essex. These sites span the wettest (Benmore) and driest (Havering) climates in the UK, enabling us to assess how rainfall affects growth.

The fastest-growing trees we measured are growing almost as fast as they do in California, adding 70cm of height and storing 160kg of carbon per year, about twice that of a native UK oak. The trees at Benmore are already among the tallest trees in the UK at 55 metres, the current record-holder being a 66 metre Douglas Fir in Scotland. The redwoods, being faster growing, are likely to take that title in the next decade or two. And these trees are “only” around 170 years old. No native tree in the UK is taller than about 47 meters. We also found significant differences in growth rates across the UK. They grow fastest in the north where the climate is wetter.
(more)

https://theconversation.com/redwood-trees-are-growing-almost-as-fast-in-the-uk-as-their-californian-cousins-new-study-225475

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #632 on: March 14, 2024, 07:06:13 PM »
Sweden has vast ‘old growth’ forests – but they are being chopped down faster than the Amazon


Most of Europe’s natural ecosystems have been lost over the centuries. However, a sizeable amount of natural old forest still exists, especially in the north. These “old-growth” forests are exceptionally valuable as they tend to host more species, store more carbon, and are more resilient to environmental change.

Many of these forests are found in Sweden, part of the belt of boreal forests that circle the world through Canada, Scandinavia and Russia. But after researching these last relics of natural forest we have found they are being cleared rapidly – at a rate faster even than the Amazon rainforest.

There is no direct monitoring of these forests, no thorough environmental impact assessments and most of the public don’t seem to be aware this is even happening. Other evidence suggests something similar is happening right across the world’s boreal forests.

It can be tricky to know exactly how much old-growth forest there is, since the distinction might not always be clear. However, there is a clear difference between forests that have been “clear-cut” (entirely chopped down) sometime in the past and those that never have.

Clear-cutting started appearing in Sweden in the early 1900s and has been the dominant type of forestry in the country since the 1950s. The uncut forests that predate this time have therefore most likely not been clear-cut and since they are old they can be classified as old-growth forests.

In our study, we looked specifically at forests in unprotected areas where the trees predated 1880 on average. That’s long before the large-scale adoption of clear-cutting in Sweden and means those forests have likely never been clear-cut.

These unprotected old-growth forests constitute around 8% of the productive forest land in Sweden, that is, the area that is generally favourable for forestry (omitting forests close to the Scandinavian mountain range tree line). This amounts to about 1.8 million hectares of old-growth forest, more than the total wooded area in many European countries.

This area of unprotected old-growth forest, with the remaining protected old-growth and primary forests, constitutes a large share of the last known ecosystems of “high naturalness” in the EU.

What is happening to these old-growth forests?
Between 2003 and 2019, 20% of all the clear-cut forest in Sweden was old-growth. This means a sizeable share of forest products, such as timber, paper and bioenergy, comes from old trees. The losses to unprotected old-growth forests amount to 1.4% per year, which means they will be lost completely by the 2070s if the trend continues.

To put this in perspective, Sweden’s old-growth forests have been cleared six to seven times faster than the Brazilian Amazon forest between 2008 and 2023. (Of course, given the size of the Amazon, the total amount of cleared forest is much larger there).

While our study, shockingly enough, appears to be the only of its kind across the boreal region, there is some research showing that old-growth forests are also harvested in Canada. Additional anecdotal evidence further suggests the unchecked loss of old-growth forests to forestry operations in other boreal regions .

What’s next?
The European Commission has drafted guidelines for all countries to map and protect all remaining old-growth and primary forests. This would be a good start.

But ultimately, we’ll need a coordinated system to map and monitor the entire boreal forest simply to learn the rate at which it is being lost. This would also help us understand the implications for carbon storage, for other plants and animals that live in these forests, and the humans that use them.

Unfortunately, this is a large and difficult task. Yet this might be one of our last chances to protect and recover large areas of natural forests. Logging old-growth forests now will delay their recovery for centuries.

https://theconversation.com/sweden-has-vast-old-growth-forests-but-they-are-being-chopped-down-faster-than-the-amazon-218753
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kiwichick16

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 936
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 90
  • Likes Given: 36
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #633 on: March 15, 2024, 04:45:21 AM »
@  kassy .....so another factor not in the models

gerontocrat

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 20581
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 5304
  • Likes Given: 69
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #634 on: March 16, 2024, 09:44:23 PM »
Not a lot of people know this (I didn't)

Hidden giants: how the UK’s 500,000 redwoods put California in the shade

It was those Victorians again

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/mar/16/hidden-giants-how-the-uks-500000-redwoods-put-california-in-the-shade
Quote
Hidden giants: how the UK’s 500,000 redwoods put California in the shade
Researchers found that the Victorians brought so many seeds and saplings to Britain that the trees now outnumber those in their US homeland

Three redwoods tower over Wakehurst’s Elizabethan mansion like skyscrapers. Yet at 40 metres (131ft) high, these are almost saplings – not even 150 years old and already almost twice as high as Cleopatra’s Needle.

“At the moment they’re some of the tallest trees in the UK and they are starting to poke above the forest canopy. But if they grow to their full potential, they’re going to be three times taller than most trees,” says Dr Phil Wilkes, part of the research team at Wakehurst, in West Sussex, an outpost of Kew Gardens. One or two of these California imports would be curiosities, such as the 100-metre high redwood that was stripped of its bark in 1854 and exhibited to Victorian crowds at the Crystal Palace in south-east London, until it was destroyed by fire in 1866.

But there are more than just a handful of redwoods in the UK, and Wakehurst has many more than these three. The Victorians were so impressed that they brought seeds and seedlings from the US in such large numbers that there are now approximately 500,000 in Britain. California has about 80,000 giant sequoias, the official name for giant redwoods, as well as coastal redwoods and a few ornamental dawn redwoods imported from China.

When Wilkes and his fellow researchers at Kew and University College London highlighted the numbers last week, they provoked a wave of interest, and visitors to Wakehurst’s gardens have talked of little else.

“People are often worried that they’re an invasive species, but they seem to be pretty benign,” Wilkes says. “There’s no evidence they’re self-seeding.”

This could be because they are juveniles not yet ready to reproduce – redwoods live up to 3,000 years – or because their cones only usually open up in the heat of a forest fire. That means each of the UK’s trees was probably planted. It also explains how half a million giants have managed to hide in plain sight.

“They were prized possessions,” Wilkes adds. “Quite often they were planted at a manor house and they planted a driveway with rows of redwoods. And these houses have burned down or been demolished but the redwoods still exist.”

Redwood aficionados have charted some of the locations, from people’s back gardens to parks and suburban streets where homes have been built around the trees. But as the redwoods have grown, so have opportunities for conflict, such as in Canons Drive in Edgware, north London, where some residents are fighting to protect an avenue of giant sequoias under threat from insurance companies concerned about roots undermining the houses.

There are no such concerns at Wakehurst, where the redwoods are in several parts of the extensive grounds and arranged phytogeographically, with plants and trees laid out according to their continent of origin, so visitors can walk through the gum trees of Australia down into a North American valley.

In the redwood glade, sprinkled with sunlight and rain and birdsong, Wilkes’s semi-permanent smile turns into a beam. “The feeling of being in a forest, anywhere in the world, is just second to none,” he says. His work involves using satellite data and Lidar – light detection and radar – to create 3D laser images of trees, a way to measure the size and mass of trees more precisely than the traditional method of measuring their trunks’ circumferences.

“You go out in these vast expanses of forest and they’re just a different world when you get under the canopy, off the beaten track. It really pulls you in. It’s so captivating – it’s one of the most complex environments you can work in, and it’s really satisfying.”

Trees have an enduring appeal to people. Last year, researchers at Derby University found that people value trees more highly than their neighbours, while forest bathing – a western interpretation of the Japanese practice of relaxation known as shinrin-yoku – has grown in popularity.

Perhaps the unique appeal of the redwoods is their scale; the oldest of them existing before the English language and the tallest of them, at 115 metres, higher than St Paul’s Cathedral. And possibly they would have been felled, like most of England’s forests, had they been discovered by the Elizabethans who built Wakehurst and believed the task of man, as the historian Keith Thomas put it, was to “level the woods, till the soil, drive off the predators, kill the vermin, plough up the bracken and drain the fens”.

In the more ecologically enlightened 21st century, Wilkes identifies a different risk: that the desire to find fixes for the climate crisis will lead to rash choices.

“In Wales, they are planting them as a way of offsetting your carbon emissions. Is putting a plantation of redwoods in the Brecon Beacons [Bannau Brycheiniog] the right thing to do?”

He is dubious, saying native broadleaf woodland has many more benefits than just as a carbon store.

“Urban trees are not valued, but actually they do have a lot of value,” he says. “Carbon is one way you can give them a value, but it’s probably one of the least important things they provide – they cool cities, there’s flood mitigation, health impacts, biodiversity. They’re not a means of offsetting carbon. Decarbonisation is the only way.”

California’s teetering giants
For millions of years the world’s tallest trees have graced California peaks and coastlines, growing through centuries of changes. The towering redwoods that first took root in groves through the Sierra Nevada mountain range are as resilient as they are stunning.

But those landscapes have seen significant shifts over the past century and the forests have suffered. Spurred by the climate crisis, devastating droughts and scorching temperatures have added new stressors for the redwoods, particularly the famous giant sequoias, which now struggle to bounce back after big wildfires.

Part of the problem stems from California’s gold rush era, when settlers descended with an overzealous appetite for good timber, cutting down much of the old-growth forests. They also suppressed indigenous land management techniques, which included setting “healthy” fires that cleared out the forest. A century of fire suppression created an overabundance of vegetation that set the stage for larger, more catastrophic blazes.

Robbed of the most resilient ancient trees, forests now face a devastating cycle: the trees that die leave more fuel for dangerous fires. Vulnerable trees are also increasingly under attack from native bark beetles, insects that feed on their spongy red trunks until they topple. Scientists estimate that roughly a fifth of California’s remaining giant sequoias have died in recent years due to this combination of factors, including one particularly severe 2020 wildfire that wiped out up to 10,000 mature trees.

There are efforts underway in California to protect them as federal agencies, states, and indigenous communities work to bring good fire back to the land, and seed decimated landscapes with new trees. Threats from global heating continue to mount and changes are outpacing mitigation work.

Along with their picturesque stature, the trees are also crucial to maintaining healthy ecosystems in California by capturing carbon dioxide, providing a cooling effect when temperatures spike, and they are vital habitat for other forest creatures. When they disappear, the landscapes will be forever changed, along with the plants, animals, and people that have grown to depend on them.

Gabrielle Canon, San Francisco

A redwood tree among indigenious trees in Kew botanical gardens in Wakehurst, Sussex. Photograph: Andy Hall/The Observer
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #635 on: March 17, 2024, 12:18:51 AM »
It was mentioned in 631 above a bit but this version mention that they do not self seed.
So they are not forests (yet).

https://www.sfgate.com/california-parks/article/california-sequoia-trees-in-europe-18392389.php

An older story with a lower number. Do check out the picture with the house and the tree. Pretty close. They are around as ornamental trees in many places.
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1764
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 218
  • Likes Given: 128
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #636 on: March 17, 2024, 09:56:54 PM »
I think they require fire to seed, just like a few other pines in western NAm.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #637 on: March 18, 2024, 03:23:15 PM »
That was what the yet was for.  ;)

In Minnesota, Researchers Are Moving Trees Farther North to Save Forests

As the world warms, trees in such forests will no longer be adapted to their local climates. That’s where assisted migration comes in


...

In the Cutfoot Experimental Forest in 2016, the Forest Service planted seedlings of eight tree species from seeds collected from woods up to several hundred miles farther south, as part of an experiment that Palik manages. Four species are native to this northern region: eastern white pine, northern red oak, bur oak and red maple. Four species are uncommon or nonnative: white oak, bitternut hickory, black cherry and ponderosa pine.

Two decades back, these southern seedlings likely would have struggled to flourish here. Today, Palik and his team can see the success of almost all the southern trees they planted. “They are going like gangbusters,” he says, “which is indicative that the climate is right for them,” although the researchers don’t know about the seedlings’ long-term health yet. In seven of the eight species, the survival rate has been 85 to 90 percent.

“The climate typical of southern Minnesota from 20 years ago is now in northern Minnesota,” Palik says. Climatic conditions have moved about 200 miles north in just two decades.

Palik’s project is an experiment in forest assisted migration, the relocation of trees to help woodlands adapt and flourish despite the heating of their habitats from climate change. Foresters advocating assisted migration are typically not aiming to save specific species—instead, by moving trees, they want to help sustain productive forests for multiple benefits such as carbon storage, water filtration, wildlife habitat, recreational beauty and timber

...

much more:
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/in-minnesota-researchers-are-moving-trees-farther-north-to-save-forests-180983944/

Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1764
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 218
  • Likes Given: 128
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #638 on: March 27, 2024, 06:35:58 PM »
Planting trees in wrong places heats the planet: study

"There are some places where putting trees back leads to net climate negative outcomes," Susan Cook-Patton, one of the study's co-authors, told AFP.

Scientists had already understood that restoring tree cover led to changes in albedo -- the amount of solar radiation bounced back off the planet's surface -- but didn't have the tools to account for it, she said.
(snip)
Return on investment

Albedo is highest in the frozen areas of the world, and mirror-like clean snow and ice with high levels of albedo reflect up to 90 percent of the sun's energy.

It is one of Earth's major cooling agents, along with lands and oceans that absorb excess heat and planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions.

Many countries have promised to plant billions of trees as a bulwark against global warming but not all efforts deliver for the planet equally, this study showed.

Moist, tropical environments like the Amazon and Congo Basin boasted high carbon storage and low changes in albedo, making them ideal locations for restoring forest cover.

The opposite was true in temperate grasslands and savanna, Cook-Patton said.

Even projects in the best locations were probably delivering 20 percent less cooling than estimated when changes to albedo were taken into account, she said.

But she stressed that restoring forests delivered undeniable benefits for people and the planet, such as supporting ecosystems and providing clean air and water, among many.

"We really don't want our work to be a critique of the movement writ large," she said.
(more)
https://www.rawstory.com/planting-trees-in-wrong-places-heats-the-planet-study/

nature communictions

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #639 on: March 27, 2024, 06:59:15 PM »
The opposite was true in temperate grasslands and savanna

They are not exactly prime spots doe reforestation so no worries there.
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

vox_mundi

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 10233
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 3517
  • Likes Given: 754
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #640 on: March 28, 2024, 03:54:00 PM »
Forest Regeneration Projects Failing to Offset Carbon Emissions
https://phys.org/news/2024-03-forest-regeneration-offset-carbon-emissions.html



Forest regeneration projects that have received tens of millions of carbon credits and dominate Australia's carbon offset scheme have had negligible impact on woody vegetation cover and carbon sequestration, new research from The Australian National University (ANU) has found.

The research was undertaken in collaboration with Haizea Analytics, University of New South Wales (UNSW) and the University of Queensland, and analyzed 182 human-induced regeneration (HIR) projects. The findings are published in Communications Earth & Environment.

... The projects do not involve any tree planting. They are mainly claiming to regenerate native forests from soil seed stock, and suppressed seedlings, by reducing livestock and feral animal numbers.

The researchers say the projects have been controversial because decades of scientific research in Australia's rangelands suggests grazing by livestock and feral animals generally does not have a material negative impact on woody vegetation cover.

The study assessed if woody vegetation cover increased in the 'credited areas' of the projects, where even-aged forests are supposed to be regenerating, and analyzed whether the trends in woody cover in the credited areas were materially different from those in comparison areas adjoining the project boundaries.

Professor Andrew Macintosh, from ANU, said the results suggest the projects have been "substantially over-credited and are largely failing."

"The projects in the study received more than 27 million credits over the period of analysis and most of them claim regeneration started around 2010 to 2014," he said.

"Due to this, their effects on woody vegetation cover should be very clear. But the data suggests tree cover has barely increased at all and, in many cases, it has gone backwards.

"Almost 80% of the projects experienced negative or negligible change in tree cover over the study period.

"The proportion of the total credited area, 3.4 million hectares, with woody cover increased by a mere 0.8% over this time.

"Forest cover—areas where the crowns of the trees cover is equal to or more than 20% of the area—increased by only 3.6%, while sparse woody cover—areas where the crowns of the trees cover between 5% and 19%—decreased by 2.8%."

Andrew Macintosh et al, Australian human-induced native forest regeneration carbon offset projects have limited impact on changes in woody vegetation cover and carbon removals, Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01313-x
“There are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.” ― anonymous

Insensible before the wave so soon released by callous fate. Affected most, they understand the least, and understanding, when it comes, invariably arrives too late

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1764
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 218
  • Likes Given: 128
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #641 on: March 30, 2024, 12:29:03 AM »
Accounting for albedo change to identify climate-positive tree cover restoration  (link for above article)

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-46577-1?error=cookies_not_supported&code=c3846c16-2c68-4c5f-bf4a-0c8b98baa9b3

Restoring tree cover to places that would naturally support trees is a prominent strategy for removing carbon from the atmosphere and tackling the climate crisis1,2,3. However, the net climate impact of restoring tree cover depends on more than carbon sequestration; it also alters albedo, which is the fraction of solar radiation reflected from the land surface back to the atmosphere. Because tree cover often absorbs more solar radiation than other land covers, this can lead to local4,5,6 and global warming6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. In some locations, global warming from albedo change can partially or even completely countervail the cooling benefit of increased carbon storage in trees8,9,10,13,14,15.

The climate warming response to changes in surface albedo can be directly compared to changes in carbon storage by expressing them in the same unit. That unit, carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) is calculated by first converting changes in surface albedo to top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing (TOA RF) using the radiative kernel technique16,17,18,19,20,21,22. A radiative kernel quantifies the change in outgoing radiation flux at the top of the atmosphere (radiative forcing) in response to a change in a climate system state variable such as surface albedo. The TOA RF from albedo change is then converted to CO2e by finding the equivalent CO2 pulse yielding the same TOA RF, based on the average fraction of CO2 removed from the atmosphere by all global carbon sinks after 100 years22,23. This accounts for the time decay of CO2 in the atmosphere with an impulse response function24 describing ocean and land CO2 exchange with the atmosphere.

Conversion to the same unit makes it possible to calculate “albedo offset” as the percentage of cooling from carbon storage that is offset by warming from albedo change. A 50% offset indicates that a decrease in albedo halves the net climate benefit. A greater than 100% offset indicates that a decrease in albedo entirely overwhelms carbon storage, producing a net climate-negative outcome. While restoring tree cover can impact other global-scale factors that influence climate (e.g., changes in clouds, evaporation, sensible heat flux, and other factors can alter earth’s top-of-atmosphere longwave and shortwave radiation fluxes as well as surface temperatures in complex ways), quantifying their impact on global climate is not yet tractable25. Furthermore, changes in surface albedo have been shown to dominate other factors in at least some locations

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #642 on: April 03, 2024, 03:15:02 PM »
Older trees help to protect an endangered species


The oldest trees in the forest help to prevent the disappearance of endangered species in the natural environment, according to a study led by the University of Barcelona. This is the case of the wolf lichen -- threatened throughout Europe -- , which now finds refuge in the oldest trees in the high mountains of the Pyrenees. This study reveals for the first time the decisive role of the oldest trees in the conservation of other living beings thanks to their characteristic and unique physiology.

...

When old trees are life shelters

The wolf lichen (Letharia vulpina) is a species with a very limited distribution that is prevalent in mature forests and long-lived trees.

Native to the American continent, it has also been found in Europe and the Iberian Peninsula, in medium and high mountain areas.

Now, the authors have discovered that the presence of this lichen in the Pyrenees is associated with the longest-lived trees, specifically the black pine (Pinus uncinata).

"These old trees are found in the most isolated places, they grow on rocks with very little substrate and show unique characteristics regarding structure and composition. Specifically, the black pine can even live for more than a millennium, and its decay would be the most important factor facilitating the presence of the lichen," says Professor Sergi Munné-Bosch.

...

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240402140256.htm
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #643 on: April 04, 2024, 07:27:38 PM »
Despite gains in Brazil, forest destruction still 'stubbornly' high: report

Paris (AFP) – The world lost 10 football fields of old-growth tropical forest every minute in 2023 and despite uplifting progress in the Amazon, the picture elsewhere is less rosy, researchers said on Thursday.


...

High rates of tropical forest loss remain "stubbornly consistent" despite nations pledging in recent years to protect these critical environments, said researchers from the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the University of Maryland.

Around 3.7 million hectares of primary tropical forest -- an area nearly the size of Bhutan -- was lost last year, they said.

"Impressive" declines in Brazil and Colombia were "largely counteracted by increases" in tropical forest lost elsewhere, said Mikaela Weisse from WRI, a nonprofit research organisation.

...

The Democratic Republic of Congo -- home to the enormous Congo Basin, which absorbs more carbon than it releases -- lost more than half a million hectares of primary forest for another year in a row.

Outside the tropics, wildfires caused immense losses of tree cover, particularly in Canada which experienced record-breaking blazes.

Taylor said this was the second year of full annual data on forest loss since more than 140 countries agreed at the COP26 climate summit to halt and reverse deforestation by 2030.

But deforestation was almost 2 million hectares above the level needed to meet this target, said Taylor.

"Are we on track to halt deforestation by 2030? The short answer? No... we are far off track and trending in the wrong direction," he said.


https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20240404-despite-gains-in-brazil-forest-destruction-still-stubbornly-high-report
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

vox_mundi

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 10233
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 3517
  • Likes Given: 754
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #644 on: April 08, 2024, 04:43:15 PM »
Boreal Forest and Tundra Regions Worst Hit Over Next 500 Years of Climate Change, Climate Model Shows
https://phys.org/news/2024-04-boreal-forest-tundra-regions-worst.html

The boreal forest, covering much of Canada and Alaska, and the treeless shrublands to the north of the forest region, may be among the worst impacted by climate change over the next 500 years, according to a new study.

The study, led by researchers at the White Rose universities of York and Leeds, as well as Oxford and Montreal, and ETH, Switzerland, ran a widely-used climate model with different atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide to assess the impact climate change could have on the distribution of ecosystems across the planet up to the year 2500. The research is published in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

Most climate prediction models run to the year 2100, but researchers are keen to explore longer-term projections that give a global picture of how much humans, animals and plant life may need to adapt to climate change beyond the next century, which is important as long-lived trees adapt at scales of centuries rather than decades.

Modeling climate change over a 500 year period shows that much of the boreal forest, the Earth's northernmost forests and most significant provider of carbon storage and clean water, could be seriously impacted, along with tundra regions, treeless shrublands north of the boreal forest that play a significant role in regulating the Earth's climate.

Tundra regions have already seen new plants colonizing lands that would have once been too cold for them to survive on, and as the planet continues to warm, its ability to cool tropical heat, pushing it back down to the equator is reduced.

This means that if there is not a rapid halt in emitting greenhouse gases, large parts of some of the hottest countries on Earth will become too hot to be easily inhabited and considerable changes would have to be made to daily life to exist there.

The researchers highlight that although we are already starting to see animals and plants migrating as they try to adapt to changing climate conditions, this could intensify in the future. As the study highlights, some species, like trees, migrate much slower than animals and humans can, and so some plants and animals will be lost altogether, threatening the survival of today's ecosystems

... "We know now that some aspects of climate change are inevitable and so a level of adaptation is required, but how extensive these adaptations need to be is still in our hands. It is, therefore, useful to look beyond the UN's 2030 and 2050 carbon emission targets, as well as the 2100 climate model predictions, as we know that climate change won't stop there.

"By looking much further into the future—the future that our grandchildren will face—we can see that there is a significant difference between climate change rates, species migration rates, and their migration ability. Trees, for example, will migrate much slower than birds and mammals, and boreal decline radically changes the ecosystems they've formed since the glaciers retreated about 12,000 years ago.

"Those species that can't adapt or move to more suitable locations will radically decline in number and range or even go extinct."

The study highlights that current boreal regions are colder and less densely populated, but changing environments may mean more people migrate to these landscapes as they warm in the future, increasing the pressures on ecosystems and species.

Migration on this scale also relies on political cooperation from countries around the world, and researchers point out that given current global conflicts and divisions, this could be one of the most significant barriers to successful climate adaptation.

Dr. Lyon said, "What's most important, I think, is that the long-term projections highlight the scale of the change we, and especially our children and grandchildren face—even under the lower warming scenarios—and the need to start thinking very hard now about what it will take for all of us to live justly in those possible worlds."

Bethany J. Allen et al, Projected future climatic forcing on the global distribution of vegetation types, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2024).
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2023.0011
“There are three classes of people: those who see. Those who see when they are shown. Those who do not see.” ― anonymous

Insensible before the wave so soon released by callous fate. Affected most, they understand the least, and understanding, when it comes, invariably arrives too late

El Cid

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 2514
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 924
  • Likes Given: 227
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #645 on: April 13, 2024, 01:23:45 PM »
Interesting video:

they mimick a natural disturbance, in this case a huge storm to create a real forest out of unnatural pine monoculture:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&si=dqdggfeDbASi8XBN&v=BiDBAU2d7oE&feature=youtu.be


kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #646 on: April 13, 2024, 04:34:36 PM »
Taking out monoculture is always good. They should have put the sound trick right at the start of the video.


Economist: Tens of billions of dollars in forest products are being overlooked

Are we missing the forest for the trees? More than timber grows in forests -- including products worth many tens of billions of dollars. Because these goods go unrecorded in official trade statistics, their economic value escapes our attention. As a result, clear opportunities to combat poverty are being missed, according to a University of Copenhagen economist.

In the Roman Empire, custom taxes on spices, black pepper in particular, accounted for up to a third of the empire's annual income. And during the late Middle Ages, European efforts to cut out middle men and monopolise the spice trade led to colonization in Asia. Historically, non-timber forest products have frequently played a key role in the global economy.

Today however, non-timber forest products are neglected when the values of forests are recorded in official trade statistics. This applies both in the EU and globally. And it is despite the fact that these products account for a large part of the economies of many countries -- from medicinal plants and edible insects to nuts, berries and herbs, to materials like bamboo and latex.

The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that annual producer income from non-wood products is US$ 88 billion -- and when the added value of processing and other links in the value chain are included, the value of these products rockets up to trillions of dollars.

According to Professor Carsten Smith-Hall, an economist at the University of Copenhagen's Department of Food and Resource Economics, this is a good reason to begin including forest products like ginseng, shea nuts, acai berries, baobab and acacia gum into global trade accounts.

"We estimate that roughly 30,000 different non-timber forest products are traded internationally, but less than fifty of them currently have a commodity code. We're talking about goods worth enormous sums of money that are not being recorded in official statistics -- and are therefore invisible. This means that the countries and communities that deliver these goods do not earn enough from them, in part because there is no investment in local processing companies," says Smith-Hall, a world-leading bioeconomy researcher.

...

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/04/240411130225.htm
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1764
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 218
  • Likes Given: 128
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #647 on: April 14, 2024, 01:43:54 AM »
 I was a wildfire fighter for six years. The reason they’re quitting is simple.

(...)
The U.S. Forest Service is losing experience. Federal firefighters are quitting. Leadership is leaving. Recruitment is abysmal. The reason is simple: The government hasn’t significantly raised pay in decades.

Thirty years ago, a fire job could afford you a modest home. The value proposition was fair — work a year’s worth of hours in one summer and come away with a year’s pay.

But wages have barely gone up since then. An ordinary wildland firefighter will have a pay grade from GS-3 to GS-6. In 2024, the base rate for a GS-3 was $12.93 an hour. In 2014, it was $10.57. To keep up with inflation, this summer a GS-3 firefighter starts at $12.93. No step increases — you get laid off every fall. No matter how many years you work, each one counts as your first.

Lately, longer fire seasons subject firefighters to weeks of eight-hour days in spring and fall. No overtime, no hazard pay, no mess tent — and still missing family, still an hour drive out of the forest for groceries, and, usually, still on call 24 hours a day.

By the time I left fire in 2020, half the temps on my crew were living in their cars and sleeping literally down by the river because gentrification from remote work had sent housing prices in mountain towns skyrocketing.

In 2022, the bipartisan infrastructure law included a temporary kicker for federal firefighters — an extra bonus meant to approximate a $15 minimum wage — which Congress just extended. It runs out in September.

President Biden permanently raised pay for contract fire workers to $15 an hour. Pay for actual Forest Service employees appears to depend on Congress, where two bills are stalled. One, the Wildland Firefighter Paycheck Protection Act, would raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. The other, known as Tim’s Act in honor of Tim Hart, a smokejumper who died on a fire in 2021, would do roughly the same but would include more benefits, like portal-to-portal pay and a fund to research lung cancers.

Both are better than nothing, and both are not enough. If the nation wants experienced firefighters to stay in the job, it should just raise the base pay. A summer with 1,000 hours of overtime and hazard pay deserves the U.S. median household income of $75,000. (By my calculations, that’s roughly $25 an hour.)

As firefighters quit, it guts crews of experience, leadership and tradition. The firefighters who remain will be less safe. So will homes.
(fin)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/04/08/us-forest-service-losing-firefighters/

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #648 on: April 14, 2024, 07:42:29 PM »
Scientists find vast numbers of illegal 'ghost roads' used to crack open pristine rainforest


One of Brazil's top scientists, Eneas Salati, once said, "The best thing you could do for the Amazon rainforest is to blow up all the roads." He wasn't joking. And he had a point.

In an article published in Nature, my colleagues and I show that illicit, often out-of-control road building is imperiling forests in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. The roads we're studying do not appear on legitimate maps. We call them "ghost roads."

What's so bad about a road? A road means access. Once roads are bulldozed into rainforests, illegal loggers, miners, poachers and landgrabbers arrive. Once they get access, they can destroy forests, harm native ecosystems and even drive out or kill indigenous peoples. This looting of the natural world robs cash-strapped nations of valuable natural resources. Indonesia, for instance, loses around A$1.5 billion each year solely to timber theft.

All nations have some unmapped or unofficial roads, but the situation is especially bad in biodiversity-rich developing nations, where roads are proliferating at the fastest pace in human history.

...

Roads and protected areas
Not even parks and protected areas in the Asia-Pacific are fully safe from illegal roads.

But safeguarding parks does have an effect. In protected areas, we found only one-third as many roads compared with nearby unprotected lands.

...

more:
https://phys.org/news/2024-04-scientists-vast-illegal-ghost-roads.html

Ghost roads and the destruction of Asia-Pacific tropical forests

Abstract
Roads are expanding at the fastest pace in human history. This is the case especially in biodiversity-rich tropical nations, where roads can result in forest loss and fragmentation, wildfires, illicit land invasions and negative societal effects1,2,3,4,5. Many roads are being constructed illegally or informally and do not appear on any existing road map6,7,8,9,10; the toll of such ‘ghost roads’ on ecosystems is poorly understood. Here we use around 7,000 h of effort by trained volunteers to map ghost roads across the tropical Asia-Pacific region, sampling 1.42 million plots, each 1 km2 in area. Our intensive sampling revealed a total of 1.37 million km of roads in our plots—from 3.0 to 6.6 times more roads than were found in leading datasets of roads globally. Across our study area, road building almost always preceded local forest loss, and road density was by far the strongest correlate11 of deforestation out of 38 potential biophysical and socioeconomic covariates. The relationship between road density and forest loss was nonlinear, with deforestation peaking soon after roads penetrate a landscape and then declining as roads multiply and remaining accessible forests largely disappear. Notably, after controlling for lower road density inside protected areas, we found that protected areas had only modest additional effects on preventing forest loss, implying that their most vital conservation function is limiting roads and road-related environmental disruption. Collectively, our findings suggest that burgeoning, poorly studied ghost roads are among the gravest of all direct threats to tropical forests.

open access:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07303-5
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.

kassy

  • Moderator
  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 8315
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 2051
  • Likes Given: 1988
Re: Forests: An Endangered Resource
« Reply #649 on: April 17, 2024, 11:16:07 AM »
Protected areas bear the brunt as forest loss continues across Cambodia

In 2023, Cambodia lost forest cover the size of the city of Los Angeles, or 121,000 hectares (300,000 acres), according to new data published by the University of Maryland.

The majority of this loss occurred inside protected areas, with the beleaguered Prey Lang Wildlife Sanctuary recording the highest rate of forest loss in what was one of its worst years on record.

A leading conservation activist says illegal logging inside protected areas is driven in part by demand for luxury timber exports, “but the authorities don’t seem to care about protecting these forests.”

Despite the worrying trend highlighted by the data, the Cambodian government has set an ambitious target of increasing the country’s forest cover to 60% by 2050.


for details:
https://news.mongabay.com/2024/04/protected-areas-bear-the-brunt-as-forest-loss-continues-across-cambodia/
Þetta minnismerki er til vitnis um að við vitum hvað er að gerast og hvað þarf að gera. Aðeins þú veist hvort við gerðum eitthvað.