If one is serious about Right To Life, one is also serious about AGW. If one is serious about AGW and lives in the USA, one has the moral imperative to vote for Bernie Sanders. Not because he's perfect, or because everything will be super easy to solve once he is president, but because there is simply nobody out there that comes even close to him on the issues that matter to the majority of Americans, including AGW.
As for the discussion on abortion: You can try to prevent people from committing sins, through economic and social justice, the empowerment of women, good adoption programmes, etc. That's all fine.
But you cannot outlaw sins. If the God of the Bible exists, people will be punished for their sins. Let God take care of it. You are not God, and many of the unintended consequences of trying to outlaw sins will be perceived by Him as sins themselves, and the people involved will go to Purgatory for it.
Sin doesn't have much, if anything to do with AGW. It's a concrete thing, not some abstract, theological, philosophical idea that can be debated. It's about pragmatism, just like the things you do to prevent your house from burning down (with your kids in them, some of them unborn).
If ASIF members cannot agree that Bernie Sanders needs to be the Democratic nominee and then the president, or are unwilling to act accordingly, they are not serious about AGW, and I don't want people who are not serious about AGW to be members of the ASIF any longer. Which means I kindly ask those people to leave this forum and spend their time elsewhere, a place where it's okay not to be serious about AGW (there are many).
PS I don't want to see any debates about abortion.