ASILurker, three very long posts about Douma chemical attacks.
Is this your way of KIS (Keep It Simple) ? Or your interpretation of SMIF (Social Media Is Fun) ?
Why did you not follow the scientific approach I suggested, to test alternative theories ?
More about that is a second. First some general remarks.
You argument seems to consist of mostly two parts, both which attempt to discredit the theory that Bellingcat concluded :
1) You spend an LOT of text on pointing out inconsistencies in the exact number of victims, and the exact nature of the chemical used in the reports that Bellingcat mentions. Wether it was chlorine, organophosphate, or a mix of both.
I'd like to point out that that argument is still pretty much moot at this point, since we don't know what exactly was used. Let's wait until OPCW turns in their report. They may have some more insight.
Also, note that Bellingcat only mentioned these reports to give some context to the attack.
They explicitly did NOT use these eye witness reports in their conclusions.
If they would have, they would have mentioned organophosphate or nerve agent, since that was quite consistently mentioned my local medical workers.
Instead they mentioned only chlorine in their conclusion.
Bellingcat reached that conclusion by looking at the video evidence, NOT the eye witness accounts.
2) You also seem to doubt that the position of the cylinder, and the harness and the fence and the damage to to roof and the damage to the cylinder could not have happened by dropping the cylinder from the air. Mostly because the fence fell on top of the harness...
I'm sorry, I find that a very weak argument. You don't even know where that fence originally was, you don't know how violently the cylinder came crushing down, what the exact physical interaction was between the various parts at the time of impact, how much stuff bounded around etc etc.
Let's put it differently : If this was 'staged' as you suggest, to "make it look like" the cylinder fell from the sky, then why on Earth would they put the fence on top of the harness pieces ? That would be a silly thing to do, since skeptics like you would likely use that as an argument that it did NOT fall from the sky. So, using logic reasoning, it was likely NOT staged.
---
Besides these two main issues, you bring up many details where you attempt to discredit the theory that Bellingcat concluded as being most likely.
But where you fall short is in explaining what the alternative theory is that you have in mind.
You started that with "
a truck load of recently dead bodies was transported to the building and dispersed among the scene there.", but you did not get much further than that.
For example, could you answer the 22 questions that are raised the moment you go for a 'staged' or 'false flag' scenario like that ? :
https://feitoffake.wordpress.com/2018/05/09/a-douma-chemical-attack-false-flag-scenario-does-not-make-sense-at-all-here-is-why/Or if you want to go step by step, here is my first question :
In video 2, taken very soon after the attack, you see the cylinder head sticking through the ceiling, and it is frosted white (which would be expected after gas was released from the cylinder). In the video from the day after, the frosting has disappeared.
In your theory, how do you explain that frosting ?