If someone solely posts positive comments on Tesla, or solely negative comments.....
A few things to add:
It should mostly about true statements, as objective as possible, means if things are not looking good, (economically, ethically and management wise) as far as future glory of fail are concerned, there is not much else to write than that.
There is not much good to write about glory because economic and/or legal failure are more or less imminent if no significant changes are made or miracles happen.
To position yourself in the middle as an INNOCENT bystander is either a bit arrogant or slightly hypocritical because if the question is black or white (yes/no) (glory/failure) there is nothing in the middle, i.e. grey and the question in this thread is for once clearly glory of failure, nothing else.
It's not honest to put oneselves above those who try to shed light without trying to please both sides.
It's not about pleasing anyone or a..kissing a few reputed members despite of having another opinion, it's about facts and mostly when facts are conveyed in this thread there is either
religious preaching or no reaction at all. For those who dislike the word facts till proven,
we can agree on "truth" and omitting all the stark truth about what we already know
is not honest. If i post something that is not true, as you know, i have no issues to
admit it and apologize while there are folks from whom i NEVER EVER hear something
like ok but, only stereotype repetitions of news, often differing only through the landing site
of the last shipload or being against bears, a non-sympathy that I EVEN SHARE !!!!! Only that
does not change and fact/truth and it never ever brought down a healthy enterprise, perhaps
it accelerated at times the downfall of an struggling and/or ill managed enterprise, which alone
is not good because it takes away time for turnarounds and makes the filthy rich richer and the
the average shareholder poor.
This is about economic rules and laws, not about the product, not about sales numbers and not about technical details. Once the debts are too high and profits too small or non-existent there will be doom and all posts that deal with other things don't belong in this thread because to have a good product, huge sales or anything of that kind does NOT make the difference in this context.
What will make the difference is whether money is earned or burned, period.
To make certain that there are no misunderstandings, i as well as GSY repeatedly posted that
we like the product as such, i'm still a fan of the cars and GSY was one. Hence no hating involved
here.
One of the main reasons why none of the necessary steps can be made against AGW is that:
- Those who tell the dire truth are discarded as haters and alarmists
- Political correctness or political correct = hypocritical behavior that prohibits to name things.
Too many are moaning over outcomes that others have predicted and that didn't come from
out of the blue but when it was time to act/react shouters in the forest were muted.
I for one am probably one of the less pleasant/loved posters but i can tall you that i post only
a fraction of what there would be to say, hence i'm filtering. That said, that part of your
suggestion is absolutely correct, only that many have no clue how little is considered worth
to tell while there would be many times more to say.
Either Tesla will survive, then it's glory due to the positive impact on a parameter change that
indeed has happened already and is happening, or it will stop to exist in it's current form, there are more than one possibilities for that to happen, and then it's fail despite the before mentioned merits.
