Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog

Author Topic: How highlighting other disasters can help promote Far stronger climate action  (Read 629 times)

Eco-Author

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 165
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 105
Living as efficiently and as Self-sufficiently as we can are not only keys to climate change but virtually EVERY OTHER chance disaster you can think of.  Everything from Wars, crime, pandemics, quakes, volcanos, economic collapses… make a far stronger argument for change than what many write off as tree-hugging.  In a world so utterly consumed with survivalism and consumed with the thoughts of being ready for a collapse at any time, you only hurt yourselves only trying to highlight climate change.  If one wishes to argue the danger of sea-level rise to coastal cities, it only makes your argument stronger to show the literally dozens of landslide tsunamis that do and will happen... Added to this are toxic algae blooms... Stalled out super storms like Harvey and Florence... toxic inland flooding runoff that creates coastal dead zones every time... 

People are dependable but if you press them on single issues that carry such a history of negativity, why keep beating a dead horse.  You must, but why not add these other events to instill a better argument?  People respond to complete ideas and know full well simply addressing climate change would hardly make them safe.  One can even up the argument from here by calling 'cities' relics of the past... Ground Zero for any pandemic, terrorist attack, crime sprey… War, as the very nature of war has changed to target cities specifically.  The 'ecological' advantage of cities forgets that similar if not far better advantages can be gained with other 'Fresh start' systems...  Until you can adequately propose a complete package that addresses all of these needs, who's going to take you seriously. 

To me, the science community is also late on the game of countering effectively things like chemtrails and HARRP as dumb as they are, they've drained away any sense of reason and masses of people from ANY movement you try to instill.  It is a drestic shortcoming to not have engaged this croud as its now almost at a frezy'ed pace! 

I was a published disaster planner in 2004, years before 90% of the doomer croud even saw the death nail being driven in.  Study the North Caroline 1999 Hurricane season and you'd know full well what we've built just won't last.  You only serve yourselves well to embody all the foundamental reasons for SERIOUS change that you can!  ENVIRONMENTISIM has been a dead movement for 20 years for the very reason they never drew in the SURVIVAL benefits of being efficiet nor self-sufficient.  You not only have the public to contend with but the Elite that rull this world have worked for centuries to make as ad DEPENDENT on them as they can.  You need to address this.  Publics respond to complete answers, not just ego-serving green joy rides this movement has been pegged to be for nearly 20 years! 

Self-sufficiency and Durability to disasters are the absolute keys to nearly any disaster you can think of such as War, economic collapse, pandemics, Global warming, quakes, volcanoes, Hurricanes... all of which put solar farms etc. and power grids at risk!

Eco-Author

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 165
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 16
  • Likes Given: 105
For all intents and purposes, this is the view of the future that we face!  Art is a way to communicate what we've so far have not!
Self-sufficiency and Durability to disasters are the absolute keys to nearly any disaster you can think of such as War, economic collapse, pandemics, Global warming, quakes, volcanoes, Hurricanes... all of which put solar farms etc. and power grids at risk!