Perhaps you should listen to the Vaclav Smil lecture i posted up-thread. In energy terms you're saying that burning twice as much wood as you'd need to burn coal is better. That's going backwards. Trees left living in the earth are still sequestering carbon, this all sounds very convoluted to me. You should listen to that lecture for many reasons.
No. Confusing biomass with wind and solar is a strawman argument. I'm not if favor of burning biomass unless their is effective carbon capture and storage (CCS) at the power plant. Adding CCS makes it economically uncompetitive though.
And all of the fossil fuels need to be left in the ground. The energy density arguments are just fossil fuel tool and climate denier bs.
There is more than enough wind and solar to meet our needs and geothermal can provide baseload support where needed. Batteries are improving and will eventually meet our transport needs, even in aircraft.
I think that we should focus on solar, wind, and geothermal. Some battery installations to help with load balancing and instant dispatch will be needed.
Other renewables like hydro and biomass have very limited utility because scaling them up has tremendous environmental impacts. While it may make sense to maintain existing hydropower plants and upgrade their generation capability where possible, it doesn't make sense to build new ones in many places. Biomass also has potential when it can use waste wood from sawmills or paper plants, but when harvesting forests for pellets, it doesn't.
I think biomass is a dead end and will eventually fade out. It's similar to the "natural gas as a bridge fuel" argument. At first it seemed to be a promising technology but the industry morphed it into something that is more damaging in practice than the theoretical promise. (Nuclear has the same problem).
Solar is now the least expensive method to generate electricity in history. People can install solar panels on building rooftops, over parking lots, and even over farmland when managing the planting correctly.
Wind is still cost competitive with solar and offshore wind can generate a lot of electricity with much higher capacity factors. So wind may be competitive.