Thanks nanning.
Having cars that may be compelled to imprison they're occupants, and deliver them to an alternative location may bring up a Law that AFAIK Asimov never addressed.
Law (n) - A Robot must always obey its operator except when it's controlled by X.
Who, or what is the mysterious 'X'
Is 'X' the head of the UN?
Is 'X' the head of the national government that 'O' the Operator resides in, is a citizen of, that the AI vehicle is operating in, that the vehicle was manufactured in, that the vehicle was originally sold in. that the vehicle was most recently sold in, that the manufacturer incorporated in;
that the lessor is (one of the above with), that the lessee is (one of the above with), that the cab company (when applicable - is one of the above), that the loan holder (when applicable - is one of the above)?
Is 'X' the head of the local, regional, state, or federal security force?
Is 'X' a General in times of declared or undeclared war?
Is 'X' a coalition of friends and relatives acting on behalf of the operator?
Is 'X' a parent or responsible adult acting on behalf of an under-age operator or passenger?
Is 'X' a truant officer concerned about the education of an operator or passenger?
Is 'X' a fire compliance officer concerned with the safety of the community?
Could some of 'X's prerogatives be purchased by retailers, restaurants or innkeepers?
Would an 'X' be required to leave evidence of his interference?
How would multiple micro managing "Xs" resolve their conflicting mandates in a timely manner?
Who is financially or criminally responsible for mini 'X's decisions?
Must every owner, operator, passenger be informed of 'X's actions before, during, or after the intervention.
I think I could ask these questions until Musk's Flying RoasterRoadster becomes a commodity, and still not scratch the surface of the questions that need be addressed before an autonomous, but connected, vehicle is allowed to wander about in the wild, where it might interact with civilians who have never even been asked if they consent to AIs in their midst.
Musk's OTA alteration of charging protocol during hurricanes and fires demonstrate that 'X' is presently in his hands for the majority of the semi-autonomous fleet. The braking systems were also altered OTA. These are hands legally required to have twitter messages vetted by a member of the bar, but his ability to interact with vehicles as they are being driven is unchecked.
Uber, Waymo and every other purveyor of even semi-autonomous vehicles has retained at the very least a portion of 'X's powers. Again let me emphasize that this is with no oversight from representative government officials, little understanding or consent from the owner/operators, and absolutely no consent by or even a conversation with the public.
Two Democratic Senators demanded last week that Tesla end it's assisted driving program until such time as their questions had been addressed. After the next election the Democrats are expected to at the least gain some Federal power. Possibly with Democrats in charge this laissez-faire period will be brought to an end, some of the Senators questions will be answered, and possibly even some of my questions will be considered.
It's not acceptable to have a unelected, unappointed, unvetted persons having the master control over vehicles that I, and mine are forced to interact with.
Terry