Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog

Author Topic: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year  (Read 5286 times)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« on: August 30, 2019, 02:33:13 PM »
I am starting this thread so these posts conform to the DMI Greenland Year September to August as in their website http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/.

Also, if I ever get to see new GRACE-FO data on overall Greenland Ice Sheet Mass this looks like a good place to put it.

The Greenland 2019 melting Season thread is staying open, as there will be many 2019 reports coming out to the end of the year and beyond.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

blumenkraft

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1369
  • Fans of Hans Club - circa 2018
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 610
  • Likes Given: 858
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2019, 10:18:32 PM »
That naming will surely prevent weekly questions about the meaning of SMB. ;)
Refugees welcome

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2019, 01:57:40 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 7 September


MELT continues to fall in line with the average,

PRECIPITATION has been higher than average,

so as a result, in this first week of the new DMI Greenland year, SMB gain is above average
________________________________________________________________________
Quote from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

P-maker

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 238
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 14
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2019, 07:35:59 AM »
Gerontocrat,

Thank you for keeping track of this. Please check the units and the numbers on your second graph. It sure seems like a lot ice per square km.

Thanks

Alexander555

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 821
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 34
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2019, 12:17:42 PM »
It's not that much. A ton is something close to 1 by 1 by 1 meter. A km2 is 1 million m2 . So a layer of 1 km2 and 1 meter thick is a million tons. That makes 7000 tons close to nothing.

nukefix

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 461
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 9
  • Likes Given: 1
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2019, 12:21:30 PM »
1 gigaton of ice ~= 1km^3

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #6 on: September 11, 2019, 01:50:32 PM »
1 gigaton of ice ~= 1km^3

Late at night, I mixed up my gt, tons & '000s of tonnes when trying to do the analysis in a hurry.
That'll teach me..

So I am deleting the post and doing it again.

Damn & Blast, sorry all. Mea Culpa

"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

blumenkraft

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1369
  • Fans of Hans Club - circa 2018
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 610
  • Likes Given: 858
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2019, 01:57:55 PM »
No worries, thanks for your great work! :)
Refugees welcome

Alexander555

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 821
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 34
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2019, 02:20:16 PM »
Are you sure it was wrong ? Normaly it can not be that much more than 7 mm a year. If i'm right the loss is from glaciers calving.

SteveMDFP

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1439
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 187
  • Likes Given: 15
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2019, 02:35:38 PM »
1 gigaton of ice ~= 1km^3

Late at night, I mixed up my gt, tons & '000s of tonnes when trying to do the analysis in a hurry.
That'll teach me..

So I am deleting the post and doing it again.

Damn & Blast, sorry all. Mea Culpa

Well, what's a few orders of magnitude among friends?

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2019, 02:41:56 PM »
Try again...... Only got it wrong by a magnitude of 10^3
The per km2 calculations are now in million tons per km2, i.e. tons per m2. 1 ton per m2 equates to a water equivalent height change of 1 metre, or about 1.09 metres of solid freshwater ice.

_____________________________________________________________________
Apart from the DMI daily daily data, we have occasional papers such as this one....
https://www.pnas.org/content/116/19/9239
Forty-six years of Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance from 1972 to 2018

and hopefully GRACE-FO data on a monthly basis (still only up to May 2019).

There is of course, always a problem. The PNAS paper, which is incredibly good, and has a super spreadsheet to download, summarise the individual glacial sub-regions into 7 basins, as does  the GRACE-FO data. BUT, the boundaries are not quite the same. (see 1st image).

So the SMB, discharge and Net Mass Balance basin data in the PNAS paper cannot be matched simply to the GRACE-FO Net Mass Balance basin data. Scientists, bless 'em!
________________________________________________________________________
The PNAS paper analyses the Greenland ice sheet (GIS) mass balance change down to individual glacial basins and summarises the data into the 7 drainage basins.

I attach 2 graphs. One looks at cumulative ice mass loss by basin and in total, the other looks at mass change per km2.

The cumulative mass loss graph shows that
- the South West basin in recent years has switched from mass gain to mass loss,
- The North West and the South East are losing the greatest mass of ice,
- overall mass loss from 1972 to 2018 equivalent to nearly 14 mm of sea level rise,

The cumulative mass loss graph per KM2 shows that
- The North West (NW) and the South East (SE) are losing the greatest mass of ice per square kilometre by far,.
- average NW basin height loss 1972-2018 circa 5.5 metres (water equivalent),
- average SE basin height loss 1972-2018 circa 6.5 metres (water equivalent),
- overall GIS height loss 1972-2018 nearly 3 metres (water equivalent).

Of note also is that of the 260 sub-basins/glaciers in the PNAS data, in 1972 only about 35 were losing mass. In 2018, that figure is over 200. It is a different icesheet.

_______________________________________________________________________
I will be (I hope) working on comparing the PNAS data (which starts in 1972) with the GRACE-FO data from 2002. I also will be digging out the data on individual glaciers for posting on the threads for those glaciers.

Have I got it right this time?
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2019, 06:59:49 PM »
More data derived  from the PNAS paper  https://www.pnas.org/content/116/19/9239
Forty-six years of Greenland Ice Sheet mass balance from 1972 to 2018


I had a look at three individual glaciers mass loss from 1972 to 2018. The attached graph shows that the glaciers losing the most ice are not always the ones losing the most by area

e.g. JAKOBSHAVN_ISBRAE  has lost 100GT (335 GT) more ice than the 2nd highest, STEENSTRUP-DIETRICHSON (225 GT).

But when looked at as Million Tons per km2 (which equates to a water equivalent  loss in height in metres), the JAKOBSHAVN_ISBRAE loss is 4.3 MT per Km2, while the STEENSTRUP-DIETRICHSON loss is 23.4.

So while JAKOBSHAVN_ISBRAE is number 1 in total ice mass loss, on the per Km2 measure it is at No 130 out of 260, compared with STEENSTRUP at No. 2 and No. 32.

The PETERMANN_GLETSCHER has lost 56 GT, but due to its large size this is only 0.75 million tons per km2, making it 32nd highest it total mass loss, and no 200 out of 260 in loss per km2.

I.e. looking at only the cumulative mass loss of a glacier is not a good guide to intensity of its decay. Mass loss per unit of area matters more.
_____________________________________________________
Pure Speculation:-
The area calculated by the PNAS paper of the ice sheet is 1.81 million km2.
The area of the ice sheet quoted most often is 1.71 million km2

My speculation is that in 1972, that was the area of the ice sheet, suggesting in the nearly 50 years since, the ice sheet has retreated by 100,000 km2.

This is not a small area, and means that for at least part of the year, the energy from insolation is not being used for melting ice, but for heating the land, which quickly releases the heat to the atmosphere. This is a positive feedback? It must be happening to some extent, (e.g. the OK glacier in Iceland is now bare land for a good part of the year)

Of course, this 100,000 km2 might just be the result of problems in getting accurate data for 260 sub-regions of Greenland.

"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Alexander555

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 821
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 42
  • Likes Given: 34
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2019, 07:11:00 PM »
I see it now, it's cumulative mass loss. So the worst part, the green line. Lost 500 000 ton between Jan 2016 and Dec 2018. That's like 25 cm a year.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2019, 07:18:22 PM by Alexander555 »

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2019, 02:27:36 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 22 September


MELT continues to fall in line with the average to almost zero

PRECIPITATION  From now until spring next year, the story is only about snowfall, which has been up and own like a yo-yo so far. .

So as a result, in this first weeks of the new DMI Greenland year, SMB gain is around average
________________________________________________________________________
Quote from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.
__________________________________________
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #14 on: September 24, 2019, 01:29:06 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 23 September

Warm & wet in Greenland..

MELT in the last 2 days refused to fall in line with the average to zero by the end of the month.

PRECIPITATION  From now until spring next year, the story is only about snowfall, which has been up and own like a yo-yo so far. . and in the last 2 days very high indeed

So as a result, in this first weeks of the new DMI Greenland year, SMB gain is around average with a blip up in the last 2 days.
________________________________________________________________________
Quote from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.
__________________________________________
[/quote]
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Stephan

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 766
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 240
  • Likes Given: 127
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2019, 07:44:36 PM »
The webcam on Freya Gletscher is working again.
Gerontocrat wrote "warm and wet", which is obviously true. New snow in the higher altitudes, and temperatures are now again slightly above melting (-12,4°C Sep20, -7,1°C Sep21, -2,8°C Sep22 and +1,2°C Sep23)
It is too late just to be concerned about Climate Change

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2019, 12:03:32 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 25 September

Warm & wet in Greenland..

The Melting Season is refusing to die. High +ve temperature anomalies might keep it going to the end of the month.

PRECIPITATION It has been wet - but maybe not so much for the next few days.
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
__________________________________________
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2019, 01:53:20 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 28 September

Warm & wet in Greenland..

Melt a tiny bit of melt

plus

PRECIPITATION very very low.

gives

SMB with an unusual though very small loss on this day.

Looks like Greenland will be very dry for the next few days with high +ve temp anomalies. Just might see very low SMB gains and even a loss or two.
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
__________________________________________
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2019, 12:16:55 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 29 September

Melt a tiny bit of melt - almost zero

but

PRECIPITATION Greenland "drizabone"

gives

SMB with a 2nd unusual though very small loss on this day.

Looks like Greenland will be very dry for the next few days with high +ve temp anomalies. Just might see very low SMB gains and even a loss or two.
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
__________________________________________
[/quote]
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Stephan

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 766
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 240
  • Likes Given: 127
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #19 on: September 30, 2019, 02:26:28 PM »
News from Freya Webcam (1.053 m above sea level)
Three days ago temperature rose to +6.5°C. Rain had melted away all the snow. Then some snow fell again on Sep 28, but now the sky is bright and the sun - although much less powerful than in summer - managed to melt away most of it on the southern side of the mountains.

See attached photo
Link to this webcam: https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/freya1/
It is too late just to be concerned about Climate Change

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2019, 09:35:55 PM »
Hullo Stephan

What a beautiful photo - such clarity.
Given the weather outlook might be some more chances.

Do we know what webcams are operating on Greenland?
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

oren

  • Young ice
  • Posts: 4490
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 878
  • Likes Given: 1287
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #21 on: October 01, 2019, 02:37:06 AM »
Not many, a few listed in this link:
http://banquisaenelartico.blogspot.com/p/groenlandia.html
Including at Summit and at EastGRIP, a couple of others, and a second webcam at Freya.

More Arctic webcams in this link but no additional ones in Greenland itself:
http://banquisaenelartico.blogspot.com/p/webcams.html

There used to be the Hotel Arctic webcam (Ilulissat Ice fjord) but it seems to gone and the link is dead:
http://hotelarctic.com/om_hotel_arctic/webcam/

And the Helheim Glacier webcam also appears to be offline, maybe Espen knows more:
http://glacierresearch.com/locations/helheim/realtime-images-terminus.html

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #22 on: October 04, 2019, 02:31:17 PM »
SE Greenland has been getting a lot of precipitation, from the "back end" of lows.

I wonder how much is falling as rain, and how much as snow.
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #23 on: October 07, 2019, 09:15:20 PM »
When I named this thread I forgot to add to the title - Discharge and Mass Loss.

GRACE-FO are producing monthly data for Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheet Mass Change (i.e. SMB less calving and melt from ocean water)

Germany is the best source - links....
http://gravis.gfz-potsdam.de/greenland
http://gravis.gfz-potsdam.de/antarctica
Nice maps and graphs

& Data @.....
ftp://isdcftp.gfz-potsdam.de/grace/GravIS/GFZ/Level-3/ICE/GIS
ftp://isdcftp.gfz-potsdam.de/grace/GravIS/GFZ/Level-3/ICE/AIS

Greenland in the 30 days Mid-June to Mid-July 2019 lost 210 GT of ice,  N.B. before the major melt event in late July early August.

The Raw Data graph also shows SMB going up and then down hugely in 2016
- data problems as the GRACE satellite showed its age, or was there a really big snowfall followed by major melt?
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #24 on: October 10, 2019, 01:16:42 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 9 October 2019

Accumulated Data 1 Sept to 9 October

Melt Very little and from now of zero consequence until next April

but

PRECIPITATION up & down like a yo-yo and slightly above average

gives

SMB slightly above average
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
__________________________________________
[/quote]
[/quote]
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #25 on: October 19, 2019, 01:22:16 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 9 October 2019

Accumulated Data 1 Sept to 18 October

Melt Very little and from now of zero consequence until next April

but

PRECIPITATION up & down like a yo-yo and at average

gives

SMB  gain is average. But this disguises the East - West Greenland contrast, below average SMB gain in the West, above average SMB gain in the East, especially the SE.

The Baffin Sea also has well above average SSTs. Perhaps this will keep calving and glacier melt at the ocean edge above average (not included in SMB data.  (S= Surface)).
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
__________________________________________
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Stephan

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 766
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 240
  • Likes Given: 127
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #26 on: October 20, 2019, 10:45:27 AM »
An update from Freya Gletscher, E Greenland:
It has become quite cold. The sky is clear, but the valley with the glacier in it does not receive any sun beams, because the sun is already too low.
In that part of Greenland there are only a few cm of snow in the higher altitudes.
See attached photo.
It is too late just to be concerned about Climate Change

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #27 on: October 20, 2019, 11:49:21 AM »
News from Freya Webcam (1.053 m above sea level)
Three days ago temperature rose to +6.5°C. Rain had melted away all the snow. Then some snow fell again on Sep 28, but now the sky is bright and the sun - although much less powerful than in summer - managed to melt away most of it on the southern side of the mountains.

See attached photo
Link to this webcam: https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/freya1/
Lovely photo again, Stephan.

Seem to be a lot of live webcams to be found from .... https://www.webcams.travel/popular/greenland

Here is one from Nuuk Harbour - not a lot of ice. When does winter come?
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #28 on: October 26, 2019, 08:33:57 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 25 October 2019


Nothing of consequence to report .... posted to remind myself to keep the thread alive.

Accumulated Data 1 Sept to 25 October

Melt Very little and from now of zero consequence until next April

but

PRECIPITATION up & down like a yo-yo and overall average

gives

SMB at average - with the usual less than average on the west and above average in the East (especially SE)
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
__________________________________________
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Stephan

  • Grease ice
  • Posts: 766
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 240
  • Likes Given: 127
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #29 on: October 26, 2019, 08:55:22 PM »
Nothing new from Freya Gletscher Webcam too - apart from a temperature rise from -18.7°C (22 Oct) to -2.9°C (26 Oct). Not much snow, and it looks like sunset, but it is noon!

PS: Freya Webcam seems to have problems (once again). There are only around 10 days of pictures available for this month so far.
Link: https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/freya1/
It is too late just to be concerned about Climate Change

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #30 on: November 05, 2019, 12:13:47 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 4 November 2019


Nothing of consequence to report .... posted to remind myself to keep the thread alive.

Accumulated Data 1 Sept to 4 November

Melt From now of zero consequence until next April

but

PRECIPITATION up & down like a yo-yo and overall average or a bit below.

gives

SMB slightly below average - with the usual less than average on the west and above average in the East (especially SE), plus a unusual above average SMB area in he NW corner.
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
_________________________________________
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #31 on: November 12, 2019, 01:09:56 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 11 November 2019


Nothing of consequence to report .... posted to remind myself to keep the thread alive.

Accumulated Data 1 Sept to 11 November

Melt From now of zero consequence until next April

but

PRECIPITATION up & down like a yo-yo and back to overall average due to days of high snowfall in the South East.

gives

SMB close to average - with the usual much less than average on the west and much above average in the East (especially SE), and a blob of above average SMB in the NW.
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
_________________________________________
[/quote]
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)

Darvince

  • Frazil ice
  • Posts: 285
    • View Profile
    • NSIDC Daily
  • Liked: 19
  • Likes Given: 6
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #32 on: November 16, 2019, 11:11:40 PM »
Strong and widespread storm dumping snow on Greenland right now...

http://polarportal.dk/fileadmin/polarportal/surface/SMB_combine_SM_day_EN_20191115.png

gerontocrat

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6612
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1547
  • Likes Given: 21
Re: Greenland 2019-20 SMB (Snowfall & Melting) Year
« Reply #33 on: November 17, 2019, 01:07:32 PM »
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/ as at 16 November 2019

As Darvince posted, quite a dump of snow Nov 14 & 15 - highest this season so far.

Accumulated Data 1 Sept to 16 November

Melt From now of zero consequence until next April

but

PRECIPITATION up & down like a yo-yo and back to overall average due to days of high snowfall mostly in the South East.

But the latest snow dump means

SMB above average - with the usual much less than average on the west and much above average in the East (especially SE), and a blob of above average SMB in the NW.
________________________________________________________________________
Quotes from DMI
Quote
The Greenland Ice Sheet evolves throughout the year as weather conditions change. Precipitation increases the mass of the ice sheet, whilst greater warmth leads to melting, which causes it to lose mass. The term surface mass balance (SMB) is used to describe the isolated gain and loss of mass of the surface of the ice sheet – excluding the mass that is lost when glaciers calve off icebergs and melt as they come into contact with warm seawater.

Melting does not in itself necessarily give rise to mass loss, however. Much of the meltwater will refreeze in the surface snow layers rather than running off the ice sheet, and this process is included in the calculations of surface mass balance which is why the melt area plot may differ from the areas of negative mass balance seen on the map “Daily change”. Likewise, sublimation does not count as melting and surface mass balance can therefore occur with the surface temperature being far below the melting point.
_________________________________________
[/quote]
[/quote]
"Para a Causa do Povo a Luta Continua!"
"And that's all I'm going to say about that". Forrest Gump
"Damn, I wanted to see what happened next" (Epitaph)