My apologies for putting words into your mouth.
But from how the article quotes Zeke (for whom I have quite a bit of respect), both in the section you quoted and what he says regarding the changes to aerosols, it does seem to imply that the El Nino is "weird" because we are seeing its warming effect earlier than anticipated, when a much simpler explanation would be there is more at play than just an El Nino. They the bring up the other factors, but the tone is dismissive in each case.
I think they should have instead said something like: "This is a strange year, climactically, because we are seeing warming that doesn't fit a typical El Nino pattern, and therefore implies that other factors are at play"
An even greater error, from my persective, is that the article says we are seeing the El Nino ramp up faster than expected, when it seems like the opposite is true. Other major El Nino years showed earlier Nino 3.4 index increases than we are seeing currently, but attributed warming was delayed relatively.
The pattern of warming, from my perspective, seems to support the contribution of removal of aerosols over the oceans, as one would expect this to bury heat in the ocean while in a La Nina phase and during the warm season, and then release that heat even more so while in an El Nino and cold or transitional season.