Fortunately, most people in this thread seemed to agree that compulsory vaccination is going too far. At least morally (it's also unpragmatic). I was very happy about that.
In most countries, most children are compulsorily vaccinated by at least 8-10 vaccines for the benefit of the whole society. Before vaccinations, 50% of children did not live to 18! So there is nothing morally wrong about compulsory vaccination - on the contrary, it is morally wrong to object compulsory vaccination.
The only reason to object is that these new mRNA vaccines have no long term track record. Fortunately, the Chinese produce old school vaccines (the sort that's been in use for 150+ years). So anyone who does not like mRNA vaccines should get the Chinese attenuated virus vaccines. That is the solution to the problem.
Yes, but here comes the hypocrisy of (most) EU politicians, who all agree that vaccination is the most important thing except for geopolitics and market share.
In Germany, currently all but one vaccinations are "only" recommended. The only compulsory vaccination is the one against measles. That has been introduced in 2020, but was in the making before the COVID pandemic. The given reasons are:
- heavy disease for children, even more so for adults, so every outbreak places a high strain on hospitals
- disease also hits those who can't protect themselves, especially infants < 1y who can't be vaccinated
- very transmissible, herd immunity is only reached at >95%
- immunity through vaccination is considered for-life
- infection probability when exposed to the virus: unvaccinated 100%, vaccinated 5%
Even with these compelling reasons, measles vaccination is not completely mandatory, but only for all children and for people working in certain institutions, and there are some exceptions.
A compulsory COVID vaccination would be different in several ways:
- heavy disease rare for children, less so for adults
- immunity against infection wanes within months
- new variants with immune escape occur much more often
- most (to my knowledge) vaccines (somewhat) more likely to lead to heavy side effects for children and young adults than for older people
Every child, if e.g. starting at 3, would have to be vaccinated 15 or even 30 times until adulthood, "only" not to get infected and then infect others who could then end up in hospital. But infection would still possible even with vaccination, though less probable, even more so since the speed with which new variants now occur is so high - while the possible side effects would be, though not probable, less exceptional than for adults.
So in my view, a compulsory vaccination for children is not appropriate at this time. It's another thing with adults over a certain age (40+, 50+, 60+?). That can be defended morally, although even then the practical considerations remain (for which I'm still not sure whether it's appropriate at all). And of course the matter of sanctions - with measles, there are administative fines, which is the maximum I'd ever support.
This is only my current thinking; I'm not quite sure about the whole question and am still open for new developments and arguments, which could lead me to change my opinion. I also don't have expertise in medicine.