Not much of a controversy Jim, but it is sad how lazy the media are in checking their stories.
A bit sadder when I see sites like Livescience.com also lazily report it as melting at the north pole.
What we now see is the inevitable backlash of "as usual they lied again" responses.
So from the comments from the scientists can we conclude that the webcams were located near each other and are near 819920 (as the updated drift map now states) and that the IMB site showing the webcam 2 as being near 2013E is probably close, but the page showing webcam 1 as being near 2013B, and by implication near 975420, could be wrong.