I do wonder if atmospheric aerosol levels have begun to rebound somewhat, since global traffic has picked up massively since mid-March.<snip>
I also think it is also worth noting that Antarctica and the Arctic are two different animals
<snip>
And yes, the northern and southern hemispheres are profoundly different. The Antarctic suffers from nothing like the pollution issues the Arctic has, and as a "cold continent" the ice it has locked in is much better protected from heat.
There will probably be retreats by the Antarctic ice caps over the next few centuries, but unless CO2 spirals totally out of control (> 1000PPM), they will probably persist long after the Arctic ice and Greenland ice cap are memories.
Because of that, atmospheric circulation in the southern hemisphere will probably remain broken into three circulation cells. It would be fascinating to see, but, none of us will live that long I expect.
Totally agree
Antarctica is a continent, it is not subject to the same melting mechanisms, and the damage is not seen with the same measurements
If we just look at the extent of the sea ice, this is not the biggest change
The pack ice is fed by ice from the continent
As long as there is a large volume of ice on the mainland, pack ice will continue to form
As the ice from the continent is sliding faster and faster towards the pack ice, the surface area of the pack ice is not a big clue.
But the total volume of ice is interesting when you add pack ice and land ice.
We can see that the loss has been enormous for decades, and the loss is accelerating
In the arctic as we know, all the sea ice data is a representative mesure of the arctic health
In Antarctica sea ice is just a few part
https://www.pnas.org/content/116/4/1095So we can't compare arctic and Antarctica freezing, or deduce the future of arctic with the antarctic observations or experience
In blue anomaly
Red Glace loss
Purple total mass