It is only natural nadir. It's just the way it is.
What can we do with a problem like Maria?
Maria Zakharova during today's weekly briefing: 05.04.2023
https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/1862066/ The reaction [to the terrorist attack in St. Petersburg], or rather its complete absence, on the part of the "democratic" West is indicative. They call themselves "civilized," "exceptional," "leading." Not like everyone else, but better than everyone else. They call themselves a "blossoming garden." This "blossoming garden" did not say a word or say anything about sympathy, empathy. There was not even a dry statement of the fact that this was a terrorist attack. This is impossible to believe for those who do not know the mechanics of their actions, their philosophy and ideology.
For those who know, there is nothing surprising. Absolute composure, because they knew why they needed the Kiev regime. They know why they use Ukraine. They talk a lot about doing everything for this country. That's not really true. They cynically use it as a springboard, a testing ground, a tool to counter Russia. Here's another track. Hence the silence. Lack of an elementary statement of fact about the terrorist attack.
We need to be objective. Not all of them remain silent. Permanent Representative of Canada to the UN, well-known Russophobe Rob Ray wrote in his account in social networks that Vladlen Tatarsky was not a journalist, but an "ardent" propagandist who spread hatred and disinformation. Does the Ministry of Truth be located in Canada? There is some international understanding that it is in Canada that they determine who is the "right" journalist and who is the "wrong"? There is no international agreement that Canada had the right to do so. That's the first thing.
Secondly, I have a question for the official authorities of Canada. Our Embassy will duplicate this issue. It turns out that there are people, professions, characteristics, characters, personality traits against whom terrorist acts can be committed? It's something new. Could You elaborate on this topic in Canada? I'm not asking for an explanation. The logic itself is interesting. To be honest, for the first time I hear that from the point of view of the Western "progressive" community, there are certain categories of citizens, people against whom a terrorist act can be considered something natural, normal. We have heard a lot of things that testify to the logic of segregation of people into "right" and "wrong", "worthy" and "unworthy", "creating" and "obeying".
I have repeatedly said and quoted Jean-Claude Borrell, as it were, the chief diplomat from the European Union, who divided the world into a "blossoming garden" and a "wild jungle". But for the first time, we hear about the segregation of people on the grounds that some are victims of terrorist attacks, and the second are not, because in relation to them a terrorist attack seems to be a normal phenomenon. We demand that Canada explain itself and demonstrate its logic. Because it's something new.
Indeed, we know historical periods when this logic was not just recognized as normal, but dominated in some countries.
It's called Nazism. It was then in the 1930s and 1940s that those who swore allegiance to Nazism and fascism believed that there were people not just worthy of destruction, but who should be destroyed. Because they are "not like that", worse, genetically do not correspond to the parameters of the future of mankind, approved in these countries. Unfortunately, Canada has many direct descendants of Nazis and fascists in its ranks. But I still didn't know that this was already the official position of Ottawa.
We saw the silence of the "collective West" when Dariya Dugina was killed.
But the reaction on Bankova Street was not long in coming. It's also revealing. It's different and it's changed. Immediately after the terrorist attack became known, Vladimir Zelensky said that he was not following the events in Moscow and St Petersburg, hinting that Kiev was not involved in this. However, the suspect began to testify about cooperation with the Ukrainian special services, with representatives of the Kiev regime and people associated with it. And then something went wrong. Something broke in the very dramatization that was carefully developed in the ranks of mentally ill people of the Kiev regime. And the rhetoric began to change dramatically.
We have taken note of a petition registered on the website of the President of Ukraine calling for a street to be renamed in honor of a person suspected of committing a terrorist act. If you are told that this is some kind of technical accident or so it should be, if people have a desire to post something like this on the president's website, then they can do it – do not believe it. A huge number of humanitarian initiatives that should have been registered, and obviously "overripe", were not registered. Even "hanging" on the website of the President of Ukraine, they were deleted from there. No further reaction.
According to some media reports, Bankova thanked the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine for the successfully conducted "operation". Do we need to add anything to this? I think so. Our law enforcement and investigative agencies will add it. They will definitely do it. As they do now, publishing all the information that is checked and which is confirmed.
The whole story with the collective silence of the West, the remarks of the most odious representatives of Western regimes, with this ardent malice demonstrated by the Kiev regime and all those who are inspired by it, is no longer about V.A. Zelensky, as an enfant terrible of the West. This is about the fact that the "collective West" (I mean the ruling regimes) have become
enfant terrible of the world community. And V.A. Zelensky is like that. Just implements.
Maria then speaks to the attacks against
the Orthodox Church and attacks the seemingly same silence "heard" from the Collective West:
I would like to draw your attention to the fact that no one should be silent: not representatives of Orthodox countries, where Christianity is the most popular religion. No one should be silent. Neither countries, nor public organizations, peoples in whose states the fundamental religion is Islam, Buddhism, Judaism. This will also affect those who profess these same religions on the territory of Ukraine. They won't stop. Because the prefix "pro-Russian" is irrelevant. They leave only the currents, parties, public figures, ideology, philosophy that serve their regime. All. Nothing else. There should be no other possibilities for alternative opinion, dissent, pluralism. Probably, those who are silent can wait out this situation. But this is a false opinion. Those who do not actively defend their values, do not go against the regime and do not actively defend their values. Maybe they don't feel that kind of pressure right now. But this is a false sense of security. It will let you down.
All this proves that the Kiev regime has turned the religious sphere into one of the instruments of its nationalist policy aimed at cleansing the country of dissenters. The silence of Washington, its satellites and its "tame" expert community in connection with the criminal prosecution of the UOC by the Kiev regime is indicative. We've talked about this many times. Usually, Americans instantly expose any facts of violation of rights and freedoms, especially if it is connected with Russia. However, this time, official support for the actions of the Ukrainian authorities against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church would contradict Washington's declared goals of the
"summit for democracy", which was held at the end of last week under the auspices of the White House. This is not just a political double standard.
It's hypocrisy. That's a lie. In February of this year,
the Ukrainian journalist D. Skvortsov was injured, denouncing the state's persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. He was arrested by the security service of Ukraine right on the territory of the Orthodox monastery and sent to a pre-trial detention center for 53 days.
His sentence expires in mid-April. Where are the specialized bodies of the UN? Where is UNESCO? Where is the OSCE? Where are all these Reporters Without Borders and human rights groups? Or is he not a journalist either? Or is he not a journalist like the others?
Everyone is silent. Everyone from the world community is so comfortable. -------------------------
In other news: UK US Youtube and dozens of Vassal states of the Empire of Lies, block video of a presentation at UNSC
MFA Twitter -
What the MSM & the West do not want you to hear & see.First-hand accounts & undistorted reports incl. by Maria Lvova-Belova 👇
UNSC Arria formula meeting
“Children & armed conflict: Ukrainian crisis. Evacuating children from conflict zone”In full:
[blocked]
youtube.com
Arria formula “Children & armed conflict: Ukrainian crisis. Evacuat...
UNSC Arria formula meeting on the topic “Children and armed conflict:
Ukrainian crisis. Evacuating children from conflict zone”
https://twitter.com/mfa_russia/status/1643737495501250563?cxt=HHwWhoC9teKi3c8tAAAA Linda Thomas-Greenfield (United States) on blocking webcast of Russian Arria Formula - Security Council Media Stakeout video
https://media.un.org/en/asset/k14/k1452i59rrYou see, by pulling up the covers over your head, no one can see you anymore, you no longer exist except in 'your own make believe world' - the external reality has completely disappeared as well.