Yeah, that does look pretty different from what Bremen is saying. Is one of those more reliable than the other?
maybe this wasn't meant as a serious question but it made me think about how I choose reliable sources of information.
In this case I ask myself: can I think of ways in which the MODIS camera sees something in the water which looks like ice from its movement and shape and the visible and infrared frequencies it reflects, but which isn't actually ice? I can't. Can I think of reasons why the ice concentration graphic produced by Bremen university shows no ice concentration above 10%? I can have some guesses about the AMSR sensors ability to detect the broken up and possibly wet ice which the visible image suggests, but actually I can't claim to know enough about it to be sure.
What I do remember and others which have observed the data closely have pointed out too, is that sometimes ice which was absent from the AMSR derived charts reappears later.
The uni-bremen page which shows the chart states:
The ASI sea ice concentration algorithm used here has been validated in several studies (Spreen et al. 2005, Spreen et al., 2008).
However, no warranty is given for the data presented on these pages.
For the purpose of declaring the passage open to shipping which may require rescue if damaged by ice would it be a good choice to base the decision on the first or the last source of information?