http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Viewpoint-There-is-no-Holy-Grail-of-energyGermany will fail to achieve the CO2 emission reduction targets set for 2020, and the gap will be quite significant. That’s why it is postponing the closure of coal-fired power plants and is building Nord Stream 2, writes Józef Sobolewski, director of the Nuclear Energy Department in Poland's Ministry of Energy. He went on to say:
I compared the historical emissions data for Poland, Germany and France and found for the last 20 years, Poland has reduced its emissions by virtually the same amount as Germany, whose total renewable energy investment exceeded EUR250 billion.
In fact, Germany, while it leads the way in the development of renewable energy sources, has emissions ten times higher than France that relies on nuclear for power generation.
Energy systems cannot feed solely off renewables without supply from stable sources, and for Germany, these are provided by lignite power plants, the highest producers of emissions.
A German expert on wind energy, explained that the Holy Grail of renewable energy - an energy storage facility capable of filling the gap if wind stops for
one day across the country - cannot be built, meaning it does not exist. Remember that the ‘wind silence’ can last for weeks.
France that derives 75% of its energy from nuclear power plants and emits an average of ten times less CO2 per power unit than neighbouring Germany. The French president abandoned plans to reduce the share of nuclear energy to 50%, stating that the reduction of emissions is the most important and not the way it is achieved. Nevertheless, to appease the wind lobby, he approved the construction of offshore wind farms, with a guaranteed price five times more expensive than nuclear power.
A few years ago, I read an article by a consultancy that "a wind turbine is not a wind power plant; it is an excellent financial instrument”.
One may ask who gets the most profits from the development of renewable energy. It is obvious to me that it is not the climate.
Recently, a number of reports have been published on climate change, clearly indicating the need to develop nuclear energy as the only real measure that can prevent the bad from getting worse.
Maybe it’s time now to consider changes to EU policy and the replacement of “renewable energy” with “clean energy”?