Biomethane Production on Peat Soils Leads to Higher CO2 Emissions than Natural Gas
(...)
Impact of Peatland Drainage
The principle behind biomethane is that the carbon released during its combustion was recently absorbed from the atmosphere via photosynthesis, creating a closed carbon cycle. However, when peatlands are drained to grow crops or trees, carbon stored in the soil for centuries is exposed to oxygen and released as carbon dioxide, adding substantial additional emissions.
UKCEH's field flux measurements show that while each cubic metre of natural gas burned emits the equivalent of 2 kg of CO2, cultivating maize on drained peatland emits up to 6 kg of CO2 per cubic metre of biomethane produced. This figure excludes additional emissions from fertilisers, harvesting, transport, or the actual biomethane production process.
Surge in Maize Cultivation
The area of drained peatland used for maize cultivation in the UK increased from 6,000 hectares in 2015 to more than 11,000 hectares in 2021, with the proportion of maize grown for bioenergy rising from 20% to 34% during the same period.
However, the researchers noted that not all forms of bioenergy production on peat soils result in higher emissions. For example, growing biomass crops in agricultural peatlands with higher water levels-a method called paludiculture-could help mitigate climate change. Professor Evans also pointed out that using maize as a "break crop" within rotational farming systems is less harmful than dedicating entire areas of peatland solely to biomethane production.
The study also indicates that growing maize on mineral soils, rather than peat, leads to lower soil carbon losses, making this a more effective approach for reducing emissions.
Improving Policy Decisions
The production of biomethane in the UK has increased four-fold since 2000, supported by government initiatives like the Green Gas Support Scheme and the Renewable Heat Incentive. However, the study's findings suggest a need for more nuanced decision-making to ensure bioenergy production does not lead to unintended environmental consequences.
Dr Rebecca Rowe, co-author of the study, emphasized: "The transition to net zero won't be completely smooth. Along with the successes, there will be failures and unintended consequences. Our role, as scientists, is to support the Government, land managers, and industry by providing them with the best up-to-date knowledge on the impacts of their actions so they can make informed decisions about energy crop production and land use."
https://www.biofueldaily.com/reports/Biomethane_Production_on_Peat_Soils_Leads_to_Higher_CO2_Emissions_than_Natural_Gas_Study_Finds_999.html....
Biomethane produced from maize grown on peat emits more CO2 than natural gas
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-024-02111-1Biomethane is the main fuel component of biogas, a mixture of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2), produced by means of anaerobic digestion of organic matter. Production of biomethane as fuel has increased fourfold since 20001. A principal driver of this increase has been the climate mitigation benefits of generating energy from materials such as food and livestock waste or recently photosynthesized crop biomass, such that the net emission of CO2 to the atmosphere is close to zero. The bioenergy industry estimates that biomethane production via anaerobic digestion has the potential to reduce GHG emissions by 10–13% and meet 6–9% of global primary energy demand2. To achieve these amounts, however, it will be necessary to greatly expand the cultivation of feedstocks such as maize (Zea mays) grown specifically for biomethane production to occupy ∼7% of the present global agricultural land area.
The assumption of low emissions from crop-based biomethane depends critically on the carbon balance of the land on which the crop is grown. On a mineral soil, it is reasonable to assume an approximately neutral carbon balance, with the export of recently assimilated carbon in harvested biomass having little impact on the long-term soil carbon balance. Where crops are grown on peat, however, this assumption does not hold. All forms of conventional agriculture on peat require drainage, exposing peat to oxidation and driving rapid and sustained soil CO2 emissions. Cultivated peatlands are estimated to have the highest GHG emission intensity of any agricultural land globally4, generating 2–3% of all anthropogenic GHG emissions5,6.
In addition to food production, drained peatlands are increasingly used to produce biomass for bioenergy. Biodiesel derived from palm oil produced on tropical peat may result in 3–40 times more GHG emissions than fossil diesel7. This finding led the US Environmental Protection Agency to exclude biodiesel derived from palm oil as a renewable fuel in 20118 and the European Union to recently announce a phase-out of palm oil in biofuels by 20309. So far, however, production of biomethane feedstock crops on peat, notably in Europe, has not received such critical attention.
Taking the United Kingdom as a case study, the area of maize cultivation on drained peat (>40 cm) and peaty soils (soils with <40 cm of peat remaining as a result of long-term wastage) has risen from ∼6,000 ha in 2015 (the first year for which national activity data are available) to >11,000 ha in 2020–202110. Over the same period, the proportion of UK maize grown for biomethane production increased from 20% to 34%11. Assuming that the fraction of maize grown on peat being used for this purpose corresponds with the UK national average, this represents a threefold increase in maize cultivation for biogas on peat soils. Contributory factors in this growth have been government financial support for biogas production through the Renewable Heat Incentive (2011–2021) and Green Gas Support Scheme (2021–2025), policies that are intended to support energy sector decarbonization.
(more)