1
Science / Re: Trends in atmospheric CH4
« on: November 29, 2020, 09:16:39 PM »
I made an little image showing the lack of decrease this year.
Using your smartphone? Consider switching to Theme Exodus!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Transport to market has always been the greatest expense in farming.
If your best argument in favour of Trump is that he's marginally (3 years) the younger septuagenarian.
[Neo-nazi Steve Bannon...
Trump would lose to almost anyone with a pulse at this point.
the guy who backs white supremacists.
It's a thread about police violence.
Deal with it and move on, GSY.
We're entering uncharted waters.
Uncharted and free of ice...
I can't see totality.
QuoteChances of TSLA closing above $1500 tomorrow are slim to non-existent.I LOL at myself. And I pity those sucked into the stock at such prices.
ARK Invest projects TSLA will be worth $4,000 by 2024 — and that’s the base case. That would be a lot of LOLs, even if purchased today.
Their demand is strong...
Let's face facts, Tesla is in a period of exponential growth in a 3 year cycle...
The potential of FSD, insurance, Semi, Cybertruck and energy is going to continue to drive higher valuations.
Check out the GFS temperature forecast for the next 10 days. I'm not big on CAPS, but this is GLORIOUS !!
Look at all the beautiful ice saving BLUE sub zero temperatures...
Lets discuss Tesla Inc here.
Make a thread down below to discuss Elon Musk Saint or Satan? and various other angles focusing on Elon instead of Tesla Inc.
I must save as many lives in this pandemic as I can. That includes attempting to offset Elon Musk's risk denial propaganda.
That is not really how the internet works. It´s not like even the fan boys here will automatically agree on that with him never mind all the others that have a more moderate position.
I want to make it clear...I love Elon Musk.
I still think Tesla is key to solve the climate change problem.
I remember when Facebook went public. I thought only idiots would buy their stock.
They had plenty of users but made no profit. They hadn’t even figured out a way how to make money out of that user base! Service was awful in many ways. Nobody understood the constantly changing user settings that were used for pricacy violations. All the early adaptors I knew had plans to switch to something better. The cherry on top was the dishonest and unlikeable CEO.
I still think I was right, but it doesn’t pay to be right against the rest of the world.
bluice
Energy is not all the same
You can not directly compare the energy in a liter of oil or kilo of coal to the energy from a solar panel .
1 kilogram of coal 8,1 kwh efficiency of electrical generation using coal about 45%.
1 litre of petrol 9,1 kwh usefull work if used in transport about 20%.
One kwh of solar or wind energy will give you from 70% of actual work in transport to near 100% for other uses.
We do not need to produce as much renewable energy to replace inefficient fossil fuels as just looking at raw energy consumption numbers suggests .
One is a model and one is real life data...both verified but why haven't we seen the cryosat data touted in this thread?
Looks like a lot of warmth over the CAA and Laptev, followed by quite a lot of wind that will push ice out towards the Atlantic side.