1
Policy and solutions / Re: Tesla glory/failure
« on: February 23, 2021, 09:59:54 PM »
Tech stocks are going down the most because they were seriously overvalued.
Using your smartphone? Consider switching to Theme Exodus!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
the Us and Europe still talk like they should be aplauded for getting to net zerro by 2050. we need a ban on new ff infrastructure ice vehicles today. net zero by 2030 or 2035 should be our goal.It should, but it isn't. If net zero goal is placed within a decade, people currently in power would have to make the tough decisions. They don't want to do that.
Well, now that they're trialing multiple "vaccines" on the general public, there will be a large enough sample size to determine whether or not any of them are actually effective.They are already approved, not in trial.
What could go wrong?
How things change. It's getting very obvious that Thailand was a lot better prepared than Italy or Belgium.I don't know who prepared this map, but it looks like propaganda. If US and UK are best prepated, it means that the author likes a specific way of working. I can't believe that Thailand is better prepared than Italy or Belgium.
-----------------------------
-----------------------------
[ADS NIPR VISHOP (JAXA)] Arctic Sea Ice Extent.My guess is that on Oct 27th 2020 will have it's biggest lead. If not, this will get very interesting indeed.
On the following days, 2019 is going to have several increases of more than 200K km2. As a result, on October 27th, the year 2016 starts having the lead as the lowest on record.
For 2020 to have a difference of less than one million km2 versus 2016, 2020 needs to have an average increase of more than 112.5K km2 until August 27.
Will 2020 have this average increase? If it does not have it, then on August 27th, the year 2020 will be more than one million km2 lower than any other year on record.
But you just wrote Sweden didn't have restrictive measures in place?
If that "insider" is not aware the there are no concerts or sports events in Sweden (since spring), they don't know anything.
Sep 25, 2020,12:36pm EDT
The Last A380 Just Rolled Off Airbus’ Production Line. It May Never Fly A Single Passenger.
Eric Tegler
Aerospace & Defense
The last ever Airbus A380 awaits final assembly after rolling off the Airbus production in Toulouse
Airbus completed initial assembly of the last A380, the world’s largest passenger plane, at its production plant in Toulouse, France, on Wednesday. The company has built 242 of the double-decker airliners but the future of the final jet, serial number 272 is uncertain. Will it ever fly passengers?
That’s a question for the airline customer, Airbus says. The last A380 is one of eight that Dubai-based Emirates still has on order. Emirates is the largest operator of A380s with a fleet of 115 in service. Thanks to Covid-19, all but a handful of its current fleet of superjumbos is grounded though the airline did resume A380 service to six destinations - Moscow, Toronto, Cairo, Ghuangzhou, London and Paris - starting in July.
As of August, the number of parked A380s worldwide stood at 204, excluding previously retired jets. There simply isn’t passenger demand for superjumbos or other widebodies though analysts point out that airlines are reluctant to take them off the books now since their retirement would trigger impairment charges.
Since A380s form the backbone of its fleet, that’s a thorny problem for Emirates. However there may be a way to partially get around it. Emirates could cancel its final order for superjumbos.
In May, Bloomberg reported that the Middle East carrier was seeking to cancel five of its last eight A380 deliveries. With the pandemic expected to drag on into 2021 and a full rebound in passenger demand not expected until several years later, Emirates may try to cancel its entire order including the very last A380 built.
I asked Airbus for an interview on the future of superjumbo 272 but the company declined, sending emailed responses instead. The last A380 will stay in Toulouse for production checks, engine installation, systems calibration and a test flight. Next, it will go to Airbus’ Hamburg, Germany facility for cabin installation and full painting in Emirates’ livery. And then?
Emirates said it couldn’t comment on its A380 plans, citing the lack of available spokespeople with the onset of the weekend in Dubai. That leaves 272’s future in question.
Other operators like Air France and Lufthansa have announced the retirement of their A380 fleets, possibly as soon as 2022-23. For carriers like Asiana Airlines, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways, Malaysia Airlines and Thai International Airways, shrinking or retiring the A380 portions of their fleet looks likely. That leaves only a few including British Airways, Singapore Airlines and Qantas as longer term potential A380 operators.
Even for these airlines, the numbers will have to make sense. Industry analyst Dhierin Bechai points out that the minimum A380 fleet size “for aircraft to benefit from scale advantages and service a route is considered to be six aircraft.”
A380 production began in 2006 after a two-year delay and $25 billion in investment from Airbus. The company anticipated a market for up to 1,200 of its massive airliners capable of carrying up to 853 passengers.
In the years since, Airbus estimates that the global A380 fleet has carried approximately 320 million passengers. But in late 2020 it appears possible that the last superjumbo ever built may never carry even one paying passenger.
*Emirates offered this late-breaking statement regarding the A380:
The Emirates A380 experience remains highly sought after by travelers for its spacious and comfortable cabins. The airline will gradually expand the deployment of this popular aircraft in line with demand and operational approvals.
You are talking about technology replacement which is a different issue altogether.Do you remember Kodak, diminishing returns usually can't last too long because many costs are not related to the produced volume.
Yes, I did understand your point, but you've ignored mine, and just repeated nonsense. When it comes to economics, harnessing renewable energy is a matter of producing manufactured goods.
When in human history has any major manufactured good ever shown a pattern of diminishing returns for any extended period of time? We essentially always see the opposite, economies of scale and efficiencies of production.
You're casting vague dire predictions about a phenomenon that hasn't been observed and is not being observed now.
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. You've provided none.
AT&T is also a similar story.
Each time that a technology fades away, you have such a story.
Same here, posts are there and labelled as guest. My former login was bluice
I'm one of those returners. None of my old posts are deleted. The old account just is labelled "guest".
If you want to take rebirth here: It would be nice to give a hint of your previous existence.
pps: Please shoot me down if you can. I don't really want to believe NSIDC could get it so wrong.Is it really bad science or just bad politics?
the waste heat that comes with FF but is not part of renewable energyOren, the issue of heat is more complex than simply waste. The largest part of my energy bill, and by a very large margin, goes into heating. Living at 60N is somewhat extreme, but the situation is similar in significant areas of the world such as Europe north of the Alps, large parts of North America and Asia and many mountainous regions. This is even more pronounced when taking into account also the energy used for heating hot water.