Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - What is the problem

Pages: [1]
1
Arctic sea ice / Re: 2018 sea ice area and extent data
« on: November 23, 2018, 04:12:05 PM »
Excuse me if you consider this cherry-picking, but the extent and area growth of late seems to me extraordinary and insane especially during this out-of-control climate change we keep hearing about.  8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8) 8)

2
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2018/2019 freezing season
« on: November 23, 2018, 12:51:22 AM »
Persistent winds from between north and east, have shaved 3 C off the Chukchi SSTs in the past three weeks. The Bering has dropped a little more slowly ~ 2 C.


3
Consequences / Re: Wildfires
« on: November 13, 2018, 03:39:12 PM »
There has been no proof that wildfires and global warming have any connection besides in the media. There is more cost of damage because there are more people and more property than before.

Yes, it's all a coincidence. Let's just wait until the proof is in...  ::)

4
Consequences / Re: Wildfires
« on: November 13, 2018, 02:55:49 PM »
By the way .... if you have 6,500 houses destroyed, at an average of 2,000 sq feet (conservatively), at a rebuild cost of $130 sq ft (again .... conservatively) .... you get just under $1.7 BILLION.

This doesn’t include other costs like lost work/wages, the cost of fighting the fire, loss of life, etc.

You would think that any FISCAL conservative would see the FINANCIAL wisdom of trying to mitigate global warming before the costs of treating the results of global warming get too out of hand.  We’re just now scratching the surface of accelerating costs of treating the results of global warming.

There has been no proof that wildfires and global warming have any connection besides in the media. There is more cost of damage because there are more people and more property than before.

5
The rest / Re: Political theatre, good for ratings, otherwise useless
« on: November 12, 2018, 10:03:10 PM »
rile up and promote further division
I hope you will also keep the other threads clean of divisive posts that align with your opinions.

6
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2018/2019 freezing season
« on: October 31, 2018, 10:40:09 PM »
Oooops. Comment by bbr2314 that I was replying to has disappeared.

this reminds me of asking some users who predicted the hudson would be frozen by the 15th of november still believe so?

i for my part don't believe that and think that hudson is holding out quite well. during summer there were repeated theories of very early refreeze of hudson and even more extreme predictions for greater parts of canada.

i personally do not believe in any wide spread re-glacification, after all the globe is warming and sooner or later retreat of the ice will happen everywhere.
I did say 11/15 for Hudson Bay and it isn't holding out well, unless, you mean the Hudson River. Foxe Basin is almost completely iced and I think we are on track for 50-75% coverage in HB by 11/15 (my prediction was 75%).

CAA is frozen earlier than ever and HB will do the same. So why don't you go bother looking at some graphs before launching into a random attack on me?

Also, SH: I deleted post regarding GB because the cold air went down into North America this wrong, and not Europe. 500MB was a bit deceiving, oops.

Pages: [1]