Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jim Hunt

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 87
1
1) Legs.

2) Hybrid push bike.

3) Lisa the second user 30 kWh Nissan LEAF.

4) Ancient Honda Jazz for emergency long journeys.

Zoe the Renault ZOE has now moved on to pastures new.

Public transport out here on the edge of Bodmin Moor is non existent. However perhaps there is a little light at the end of the tunnel?

https://twitter.com/jim_hunt/status/1222127225522335744

2
Consequences / Re: Chinese coronavirus
« on: Today at 12:14:49 PM »
If the link works this seems to be the JHU spreadsheet, which I don't think has been mentioned previously?

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yZv9w9zRKwrGTaR-YzmAqMefw4wMlaXocejdxZaTs6w/htmlview

3
Arctic sea ice / Re: Near Real Time Sea Ice Volume
« on: Today at 10:31:20 AM »
Hi,

I build up an Near Real Time Sea Ice Volume (NRT SIV) product based on merged data from SMOS and Cyrosat2.

Hi Christian,

Sorry, but I hadn't spotted this thread before. At least my alter ego has now bumped into you on Twitter!

Please see:

http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2020/01/wheres-the-thickest-arctic-sea-ice-gone/#comment-311075

and

https://twitter.com/GreatWhiteCon/status/1222448934750162944

4
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: Today at 10:26:15 AM »
Is there some formula for translating the thickness of a single chunk of ASI ice into a relative or absolute melt resistance value?

Not that I'm aware of. Melting is a much messier process than freezing.

A "Great Arctic Cyclone" in August seems to have a significant effect on Arctic sea ice melt for example!

https://neven1.typepad.com/blog/2012/08/arctic-summer-storm-open-thread.html

5
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: Today at 10:00:48 AM »
Last year over on the Nares Strait thread, we were saying that the ice north of Greenland in the Lincoln Sea must be thin as it kept fragmenting and there was no arch in the strait. Yet the 2019 chart above appears to show thicker ice above Greenland than this year.

And what happened to the "thicker ice above Greenland" of which you speak after mid January 2019? According to the theory which is mine:

Quote
Over the winter of 2018/19 ASCAT revealed that there was a relentless movement of multi-year ice towards both the North Atlantic and the Beaufort Sea. Perhaps a significant amount of the multi-year ice that survived the winter of 2018/19 has now simply melted away in warm water, to be replaced by much less robust first year ice in the area between the North Pole and the Siberian coast?

I'll allow that some melted out in Baffin Bay as well.

RIP Terry Jones:



John & Eric are still with us!



6
Antarctica / Re: Thwaites Glacier Discussion
« on: Today at 09:46:44 AM »
More news/video from the Thwaites grounding line:

https://schmidt.eas.gatech.edu/2019-field/firstlookunderthwaitesglacier/


7
Antarctica / Re: Thwaites Glacier Discussion
« on: January 28, 2020, 10:54:13 PM »
The BBC have just published a long article about Thwaites Glacier:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-51097309

Here's the associated video:


8
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: January 28, 2020, 10:15:57 PM »
It would have been nice to have a month year counter pasted over some continent.

Isn't the year/week counter at the bottom right sufficient?

9
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: January 28, 2020, 09:37:55 PM »
However, the sea ice extent this year is greater than 8 of the past 10 years.

So sea ice thickness is irrelevant to your potential prognostications? Here's another sea ice motion video for you:



Guess what happened next?

10
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: January 28, 2020, 11:46:16 AM »
The extra volume this year is in the Barents (and the Kara)

I've done my due diligence this morning (UTC), and there's still a total absence of any ice >= 4m thick to be seen on the most recent CS2/SMOS reanalysis. Chapter and verse over at:

http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2020/01/wheres-the-thickest-arctic-sea-ice-gone/

including this (hopefully?) explanatory video:



Quote
Not unexpectedly that meant that ice in the northern Barents Sea was slow to melt out in the summer of 2019, whilst after a fast start the melt in the Beaufort Sea suffered a “brief hiatus” in June before ultimately melting out almost completely.

11
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: January 28, 2020, 02:21:47 AM »
Or am I missing/misinterpreting something?

Well, since I grabbed the 2019 data earlier today rather than a year ago that map is based on a "reanalysis", whereas the 2020 one is based on "operational" data. That may have something to do with it?

I'll have to do a lot more digging to confirm that, or otherwise. However that will have to wait for another day, since it's now well past my normal bedtime (UTC)!

Should anyone else be interested in investigating the data are at:

ftp://ftpsrv2.awi.de/sea_ice/product/cryosat2_smos/v202/nh/

12
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: January 28, 2020, 01:33:12 AM »
In the absence of the mid January PIOMAS update I'm being moaned at over at "Climate Etc.".

Hence please feel free to compare and contrast:

13
Antarctica / Re: PIG has calved
« on: January 27, 2020, 11:09:54 PM »
A new PIG learned journal article, available behind the Nature paywall via Jonathan Bamber's Twitter feed:

https://twitter.com/jlbamber/status/1221878688133865472

Quote
We use high-resolution satellite observations of elevation change since 2010 to show that thinning rates are now highest along the slow-flow margins of the glacier and that the present-day amplitude and pattern of elevation change is inconsistent with fast grounding-line migration and the associated rapid increase in mass loss over the next few decades.

14
Consequences / Re: Chinese coronavirus
« on: January 27, 2020, 01:28:16 AM »
According to the Grauniad this evening (UTC):

Coronavirus: 100,000 may already be infected, experts warn

Quote
About 100,000 people could be infected with the new coronavirus around the world, experts have warned, as the UK government faced calls to reassure people that the NHS is ready to deal with any British cases within days.

Prof Neil Ferguson, a public health expert at Imperial College, said his “best guess” was that there were 100,000 affected by the virus even though there are only 2,000 confirmed cases so far, mostly in the city of Wuhan in China where the virus first appeared.

“Sooner or later we will get a case,” he said. “There are very large numbers of Chinese tourists across Europe right now. Unless the Chinese manage to control this, and I’m sceptical about whether that is possible, we will get cases here.”

Although no one has yet tested positive for coronavirus in the UK, Labour called on the government to reassure the public that the NHS could cope with an outbreak when it is already struggling with the winter flu season.

Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow health secretary, said: “The NHS is currently under immense strain this winter with staff already working flat out and hospitals overcrowded. We need urgent reassurance from ministers they have a plan to ensure we have capacity in place to deal with coronavirus should we need to.”

Priti Patel, the home secretary, insisted on Sunday that the government was taking “all precautions”, despite criticism it had been slow off the mark to find and give information to the thousands of people in Britain who had flown back from Wuhan in recent weeks.

Prof Martin Dove, a British academic, said no one from the UK government had tried to contact him regarding the coronavirus outbreak despite recently returning home from working in Wuhan.

15
Consequences / Re: Chinese coronavirus
« on: January 26, 2020, 09:40:43 PM »
Via Svein Tveitdal on Twitter:


16
Arctic sea ice / Re: MOSAiC news
« on: January 26, 2020, 09:09:12 PM »
Growth is faster and the temperature gradient quite different for a while.

The gradient change (especially when the air is cold!) reveals the boundary between snow and ice.

17
Consequences / Re: Chinese coronavirus
« on: January 26, 2020, 11:46:13 AM »
look at the data below

Here's a link to the data you refer to:

https://systems.jhu.edu/research/public-health/ncov/

Click the map at the bottom for updates.

Quote
We developed an online dashboard (static snapshot shown below) to visualize and track the reported cases on a daily timescale; the complete set of data is downloadable as a google sheet.

18
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: January 25, 2020, 07:06:32 PM »
Nice to see you around, Jim! :)

Likewise BK!

Whilst I'm here perhaps I might repost this A-Team animation from the MOSAiC thread?



Quote
The overall motion of the icepack over the last three weeks is better described as a 'Siberian Slam' against the CAA than TransPolar Drift. Note the boundary between FYI and MYI remains quite distinct and easy to track.

19
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: January 25, 2020, 06:42:41 PM »
An interesting new paper concerning the Arctic surface energy balance from the Department of Atmospheric Sciences at the University of Utah:

Midwinter Arctic leads form and dissipate low clouds

Also here's an introductory overview:

https://phys.org/news/2020-01-arctic-sea-ice-clouds.html

Quote
In the wintertime Arctic, cracks in the ice called "leads" expose the warm ocean directly to the cold air, with some leads only a few meters wide and some kilometers wide. They play a critical role in the Arctic surface energy balance. If we want to know how much the ice is going to grow in winter, we need to understand the impacts of leads.

The extreme contrast in temperature between the warm ocean and the cold air creates a flow of heat and moisture from the ocean to the atmosphere. This flow provides a lead with its own weather system which creates low-level clouds. The prevailing view has been that more leads are associated with more low-level clouds during winter. But University of Utah atmospheric scientists noticed something strange in their study of these leads: when lead occurrence was greater, there were fewer, not more clouds.

20
Arctic sea ice / Re: MOSAiC news
« on: December 09, 2019, 09:02:52 PM »
The Kapitan Dranitsyn..... last reported on Dec-03 at 11:30 UTC.

CruiseMapper reveals the current position of Kapitan Dranitsyn and numerous other icebreakers:

https://www.cruisemapper.com/?imo=7824405

No history seems to be available however.

21
The rest / Re: The Media: Examples of Good AND Bad Journalism
« on: October 21, 2019, 12:31:48 PM »
Christopher Booker is dead. Long live Sarah Knapton?

A Climate Feedback takedown of an article by The Daily Telegraph's alleged "Science Editor", Sarah Knapton:

https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/telegraph-article-misleads-with-false-balance-mixing-in-unsupported-and-inaccurate-claims-sarah-knapton/

Quote
This article in The Telegraph attempts to discuss the science of observed global warming and the factors responsible. However, mixed in with some accurate factual statements are claims that give readers the impression that the answers are unknown, and climate science is “up for debate”.

22
So not quite there yet.

I cannot help but wonder if the words and images are appearing in public after a few days delay?

Surely the expedition tracking map cannot lie?

23
The rest / Re: Brexit...
« on: October 20, 2019, 03:37:10 PM »
I'd say a letter without signatures of the government is not a valid application for extension.

John Bercow said yesterday after the latest procedural shenanigans in the House of Commons but before the "unsigned letter" from BoJo that he would send a signed letter to Brussels if instructed to do so by either Judges or MPs.

24
Policy and solutions / Re: Extinction Rebellion
« on: October 19, 2019, 01:37:47 PM »
Stick a stake through their hearts, and just like Dracula, they will be back in yet another "Hammer Horror" movie before the blood on the stake is dry.

Which goes some way to supporting our initial hypothesis?

https://www.researchgate.net/project/Social-and-Political-Psychology-of-the-Ship-of-Fools-meme

Here's the next episode of the Hammer house of horror show:

http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2019/10/watts-up-with-arctic-sea-ice-thickness/#comment-294855

Quote
David Middleton is now regurgitating the old Skate/Seadragon surfacing at the North Pole stuff.

25
Policy and solutions / Re: Electric cars
« on: October 19, 2019, 11:48:32 AM »
Whilst we do own Zoe we are doing our best to lend her to other people.

Davidstow Electric Vehicle Hire has now been "officially" launched with great fanfare!

https://twitter.com/jim_hunt/status/1184422529311629313

If ever you happen to find yourself in urgent need of some electric wheels whilst in North Cornwall please do give us a call!

26
Arctic sea ice / Re: The Mail's Great White Arctic Sea Ice Con
« on: October 18, 2019, 04:48:19 PM »
Matt Ridley was on Julia Hartley-Brewer's "chat show" earlier. Apart from accusing Extinction Rebellion of "hypocrisy" Matt was rather economical with the truth about Arctic temperatures and sea ice. At the end of the video he exhorted Julia's loyal viewers to "stand up to the bullies". I think he was referring to XR, but I took him at his word and stood up to the purveyors of porkie pies at Watts Up With That in no uncertain terms:
 
https://twitter.com/jim_hunt/status/1185157156313677824

27
Policy and solutions / Re: Extinction Rebellion
« on: October 18, 2019, 01:42:03 PM »
This morning the Viscount Ridley and Julia Hartley-Brewer have been prattling on about the "hypocrisy" of XR. At ~50:00 minutes Matt exhorted Julia's loyal viewers to "stand up to the bullies", so I did:
 
https://twitter.com/jim_hunt/status/1185157156313677824

28
Arctic sea ice / Re: The Mail's Great White Arctic Sea Ice Con
« on: October 18, 2019, 08:51:35 AM »
Too many are worried about perception, feelings, or their own personal agenda to be concerned about the truth.

That certainly applies to Anthony Watts! Hence:

https://twitter.com/GreatWhiteCon/status/1185084851336204288

Quote
As part of an exciting new research project we proudly present incontrovertible evidence of the ways in which "Watts Up With That" conspires to suppress "alternative" points of view regarding the current decline of Arctic sea ice.

29
Arctic sea ice / Re: Northern Sea Route - Days Open
« on: October 18, 2019, 08:03:36 AM »
I reckon the Vilkitsky Strait is now just about closed to "private vessels" at the very least:

30
Mike and Borge appear to have reached the North Pole today:

31
Arctic sea ice / Re: PIOMAS vs CryoSat
« on: October 17, 2019, 01:55:12 PM »

32
Policy and solutions / Re: Extinction Rebellion
« on: October 17, 2019, 01:42:54 PM »
A big XR "own goal"?

33
Arctic sea ice / Re: The Mail's Great White Arctic Sea Ice Con
« on: October 17, 2019, 01:38:29 PM »
As luck would have it the latest article published at WUWT is by David Middleton on the thorny topic of Arctic sea ice.

How "unfortunate" is it in all the circumstances that I am prevented from commenting on David's words of wisdom?

34
Arctic sea ice / Re: The Mail's Great White Arctic Sea Ice Con
« on: October 17, 2019, 12:04:13 PM »
None of us is perfect of course but those allegations are indeed far from anything I would have
guessed possible as far as @Jim is concerned.

You are very kind Philopek.

As far as I can ascertain the only possible motivation for Mr. Watts actions is to prevent his loyal readership from being exposed to the data (perhaps "facts" is too strong a word?) emanating from the Arctic.

35
Arctic sea ice / Re: The Mail's Great White Arctic Sea Ice Con
« on: October 17, 2019, 11:56:55 AM »
For some strange reason Anthony Watts is ignoring my follow up question:

36
Arctic sea ice / Re: PIOMAS vs CryoSat
« on: October 17, 2019, 11:53:56 AM »
Do we have any info if the Polar Science Center are doing comparisons of their model data with CryoSat-2 data?

Yes. See:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307429069_Comparison_of_Arctic_Sea_Ice_Thickness_from_Satellites_Aircraft_and_PIOMAS_Data

Quote
In this study, six Arctic sea ice thickness products are compared: the AVHRR Polar Pathfinder-extended (APP-x), ICESat, CryoSat-2, SMOS, NASA IceBridge aircraft flights, and the Pan-Arctic Ice Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (PIOMAS).

There's also this related set of slides:

http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/sat/meetings/documents/PSTG-6_Doc_06-01-05_SIThickness-Intercomparison-Wang-Key.pdf


37
Arctic sea ice / Re: PIOMAS vs CryoSat
« on: October 16, 2019, 02:54:58 PM »
The CryoSat-2 image is from the laser thingy?

IceSat-2 is "the laser thingy". CryoSat-2 is the "interferometric radar range-finder thingy":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CryoSat-2

It's a "measurement" of sorts, but still has to make assumptions about snow thickness to turn freeboard measurements into sea ice thickness numbers.

38
Arctic sea ice / Re: The 2019/2020 freezing season
« on: October 16, 2019, 12:35:19 PM »
The Centre for Polar Observation and Monitoring have just published the first CryoSat-2 Arctic sea ice thickness map of the 2019/20 freezing season:

http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2019/10/facts-about-the-arctic-in-october-2019/#Oct-16

Quote
Note in particular the dark blue area north of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.

39
Arctic sea ice / Re: Latest PIOMAS update (October 2019)
« on: October 15, 2019, 11:06:09 PM »
I had trouble adding a comment as well.

I just managed to add a comment over at the ASIB:

https://neven1.typepad.com/blog/2019/10/piomas-october-2019.html?cid=6a0133f03a1e37970b0240a4df8e82200b#comment-6a0133f03a1e37970b0240a4df8e82200b

That was signing in using the "Twitter" option.

40
Arctic sea ice / Re: The Mail's Great White Arctic Sea Ice Con
« on: October 15, 2019, 09:44:14 PM »
Shock News!!!

Anthony has published my polite question asking what rules I might have inadvertently infringed, and responded as follows.

Gator the abusive sock puppet is welcomed with open(ish) arms at WUWT. However Jim, bearing lots of peer reviewed evidence under my own name, is banished to the eighth circle of hell and beyond:

41
Arctic sea ice / Re: The Mail's Great White Arctic Sea Ice Con
« on: October 15, 2019, 05:57:38 PM »
The small print says copyright on anything sent to WUWT belongs to them.

Fear not Gerontocrat!

I have now been banned (again) from WUWT for the mortal sin of allowing myself to be abused in the most heinous of fashions:

42
Arctic sea ice / Re: The Mail's Great White Arctic Sea Ice Con
« on: October 14, 2019, 05:46:23 PM »
Expecting decency? C'mon, man.

The current WUWT moderator(s) has sprung to my assistance! (ROFL)^(1/0)

43
The rest / Re: Empire - America and the future
« on: October 14, 2019, 02:19:33 PM »
Apropos nothing in particular:

https://twitter.com/GenMhayden

Quote
Trump Just Enlisted America in a New Axis of Evil

44
Policy and solutions / Re: Extinction Rebellion
« on: October 14, 2019, 01:40:22 PM »
A recent "tweet" from Prof. Richard Pancost, Head of the School of Earth Sciences at Bristol University and Emeritus Director of the Cabot Institute:

https://twitter.com/rpancost/status/1183347552822976513

Quote
Proud to be a signatory to this. Some aspects of XR must improve - including its diversity and inclusion. But there is no doubt that the Climate Emergency demands radical action. And protests are essential to achieving that.

According to Reuters:

Quote
In a joint declaration, climate scientists, physicists, biologists, engineers and others from at least 20 countries broke with the caution traditionally associated with academia to side with peaceful protesters courting arrest from Amsterdam to Melbourne.


45
Policy and solutions / Re: Tesla glory/failure
« on: October 14, 2019, 12:43:44 PM »
I'm all about mechanics and engineering.

I'm all about electronics, computing and engineering, and I have to agree with you that GSY's unsubstantiated allegations concerning our IQ should be taken as a compliment from someone unable to win "the argument"!

46
Consequences / Re: Hurricane Season 2019
« on: October 14, 2019, 12:22:17 PM »
This morning's 5 day outlook for the North Atlantic:


47
Via Mike Horn's Instagram account:

http://GreatWhiteCon.info/2019/10/facts-about-the-arctic-in-october-2019/#Oct-14

Quote
Today is the last day of sunlight before it sets at the North Pole tomorrow for about 6 months. It was a cold and windy day with a lot of big leads which we had to walk around or cross over.

In [this] photo we can see Borge Ousland getting ready to cross a lead with the setting sun behind him. A beautiful scene but also extremely risky.

48
Arctic sea ice / Re: Northern Sea Route - Days Open
« on: October 13, 2019, 08:09:01 PM »
I have a series of NSR AMSR2 videos, albeit there is not yet one for 2019

You could start here, and use your own criterion for "open"?



Plus one in a different format for 2012:





49
Policy and solutions / Re: Electric cars
« on: October 13, 2019, 04:33:33 PM »
I can understand Nissan not wanting customers to do that.

So can I.

However it seems some Nissan customers would like to be able to drive their e-NV200 Combi (or LEAF) from the once United Kingdom to the South of France and back just as quickly as they used to be able to do in a Volvo 940 Estate or whatever.

50
Consequences / Re: Hurricane Season 2019
« on: October 13, 2019, 04:28:59 PM »
Things are warming up in West Africa once again:


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 87