ONI data just released...http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/Per the NOAA ONI (based on ERSST.v4 data), the JAS ONI value came in at +1.46 deg C. On the ONI chart, it will show up as +1.5 deg C.
The Monthly ERSST.v4 value for September came in at +1.67 deg C .
The monthly OISST.v2 value for September has not yet been released, but will likely be +2.3 deg C.
Note: Per NOAA CPC, ONI values may change up to two months after the initial "real time" value is posted. Therefore, the most recent ONI values should be considered an estimate.
However, if they do change, it's usually not much.
VERY IMPORTANT NOTE: I did a little research and number crunching, and here's what I found. Per the NOAA CPC ONI, only 7 El Nino events since 1950 have achieved strong status (ONI value of +1.5 or greater). 86% of those events increased by at least +0.5 deg C after the July-August-September 3 month season. The 87-88 El Nino event makes up the 14% that did not. Here's a list of events since 1950 that have achieved strong status (in chronological order): 57-58, 65-66, 72-73, 82-83, 87-88, 91-92, and 97-98. Now the 2015-16 event (that makes 8 ), though it's not set in stone as ONI values can change up to 2 months after they are initially released. Nonetheless, the odds of this event achieving at least one ONI value of +2.0 deg C are very high based on historical data. REMEMBER, 6 of 7 past strong El Nino's have gone on to increase by at least +0.5 deg C after the JAS ONI value. The only reason the 87-88 event didn't increase after September, is because it had already peaked. This event clearly has not peaked. I personally suspect this event could reach an ONI value of +2.0 deg C by SON, but it's more likely to be the OND.
EDIT: The only reason I don't think we'll reach an ONI value +2.0 by ASO, is because the monthly ERSST.v4 (which the ONI is based on) value for August came in at +1.51, while the September value came in at +1.67. That means the October value would need to come in at +2.82 in order for the ASO ONI value to be +2.0.
Also, the weekly NOAA CPC values are based on OISST.v2 data, thus they do not contribute to the ONI (different datasets). OISST.v2 data runs much warmer than ERSST.v4 data.