Please support this Forum and Neven's Blog

Author Topic: Trump Administration Assaults on Science  (Read 24388 times)

pileus

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 337
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #250 on: June 28, 2017, 09:56:43 PM »
Currently watching Dept of Energy Secretary Rick "Dancing with the Stars" Perry present on "American Energy DOMINANCE" at the White House press briefing.  It is a complete assault on science and reason and, for the lack of a better term, utter bullshit.

I assume this will get a lot of commentary within the climate science community (heads are likely exploding as we speak).  I'd encourage you to watch a replay if you can.

While simultaneously declaring the the "science isn't settled" and denigrating scientists, he is inviting a debate and dialogue.  Surely there will be many ready to accept this challenge.

Other themes are a new focus on nuclear power and what appears to be a massive expansion of fossil fuels, especially our good friend coal.  He is also making references to clean energy, which while welcome, appears to be more a deflection and attempt to distract from what is really a fossil fuel centric strategy.

Ironically, this is likely to create energy on climate change and fuel the resistance even more.


Following up on the press event with this summary article -

Rick Perry wants to hold a dangerous, totally BS debate on global warming

http://mashable.com/2017/06/27/rick-perry-climate-comments-red-team-debate/?utm_cid=mash-com-Tw-main-link#Dy0g2N3FRqqK

Perry then cited a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed by Steven Koonin (whom he called "Kooniz"), a professor at New York University, who recently called for a public climate science debate to challenge the mainstream scientific judgement on human-caused global warming.

Koonin's view, which Perry endorsed, is that a "red team" would challenge consensus findings from scientific reports, and a "blue team" would have the opportunity to respond. This is similar to how the military games out certain scenarios and spacecraft engineers test critical systems or investigate accidents, but it's not how science works.

Perry and Pruitt aren't thinking of some magical new idea that scientists haven't considered before. In fact, peer review — the process by which studies are reviewed by experts before publication — is basically its own "red team," and every major climate assessment has already been through it.

"The people who say the science is settled. It's done. If you don't believe that you're a skeptic, a luddite. I don't buy that," Perry said.

"This is America. Have a conversation. Come out of the shadows of hiding behind, you know, your political statements and let's talk about it. What's wrong with that?" Perry asked.

"I can be convinced, but why not let's talk about it?"
-----
These researchers, including Benjamin Santer of the Energy Department's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, see the idea for what it is: An attempt to put climate deniers on par with mainstream researchers, and elevate views that have been shot down again and again in the scientific literature.

"Such calls for special teams of investigators are not about honest scientific debate. They are dangerous attempts to elevate the status of minority opinions, and to undercut the legitimacy, objectivity and transparency of existing climate science," they wrote.

Yes, it's true that claims that "the science is settled" sound suspicious to many people. It's also true that calls for a reasonable debate by reasonable-sounding people like Rick Perry may be tempting.

But with the red/blue team idea, Perry and Pruitt are trying to drive a dagger into the heart of the scientific process, which rests on impartial peer review, and the constant testing of hypotheses. This comes at the same time Pruitt is dismantling science advisory panels at the EPA, and Perry is shuttering climate offices at his agency.

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #251 on: June 29, 2017, 03:22:02 AM »
The linked article indicates that Democrats are demanding investigation of potential witness tampering by the EPA against the EPA's top science advisor:

"EPA Accused of Interfering With Top Science Adviser’s Congressional Testimony"

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/epa-accused-interfering-top-science-adviser-s-congressional-testimony-n777916

Extract: "Congressional Democrats have demanded an independent investigation into allegations that a senior Environmental Protection Agency official interfered politically with congressional testimony by one of the agency's top scientific advisers.

In testimony before a House science subcommittee on May 23, the scientist, Deborah Swackhamer, chairwoman of the EPA's Board of Scientific Counselors, raised numerous concerns about what she saw as a political agenda at the EPA to "marginalize" and "politicize" scientific data used to shape agency policy since Scott Pruitt was confirmed as the agency's administrator in February."
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #252 on: July 01, 2017, 03:26:11 AM »
If science gives Team Trump news that they doesn't like, they call it bad science:

"Scott Pruitt wants to hijack the peer-review process to push bad climate science"

https://thinkprogress.org/scott-pruitt-climate-science-performance-54c018bb09b5

Extract: "EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt is undertaking a formal initiative to evaluate climate science, according to reporting from E&E News White House reporter Emily Holden. According to Holden, the program will feature a “red team, blue team” approach meant to provide “back-and-forth critique” of climate science.

But actual climate scientists argue that “back-and-forth critique” already exists in climate science: It’s called the peer-review process.

“The system they describe is precisely what scientific peer-review is,” Michael Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University, told ThinkProgress via email. “The reality is that the only thing these folks don’t like is the conclusion that the scientific community (that is, the world’s scientists, literally) has arrived at — that climate change is real, human-caused, and a threat.”"
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

Archimid

  • ASIF Middle Class
  • Posts: 678
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #253 on: July 01, 2017, 04:20:13 PM »
I think that if something like a red vs blue for climate change was done fairly, with authentic scientist, mathematicians, engineers and policy experts in both sides, plenty of time for rebutal, and public commentary welcomed,  the debate of climate change would be over. We could get on debating what to do about it and doing something about it.

But given the propensity of Trump and his accomplices to lie and deceive this might be just a farce. They'll load the dice on their favor. They'll get some luke warmers on the blue team and rabid deniers on the red team. The rules will also heavily favor the red team. I wouldn't be surprised if the referees are the Lamar Smith types.  At the end, they will deceivingly conclude that global warming is real and man made, but that no action is required. That way they get what they want. Delaying action to prolong profits.
I am an energy reservoir seemingly intent on lowering entropy for self preservation.

ghoti

  • ASIF Middle Class
  • Posts: 580
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #254 on: July 01, 2017, 09:56:02 PM »
I think that if something like a red vs blue for climate change was done fairly


Dream on. We've seen this movie before. Read Rabett Run's take on it.

http://rabett.blogspot.ca/2017/06/team-b-red-teaming-and-steve-koonin.html

6roucho

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 286
  • Finance geek
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #255 on: July 05, 2017, 02:58:20 PM »


This, very sadly, speaks for itself.

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #256 on: July 07, 2017, 04:58:50 PM »
Trump's actions are encouraging climate sceptics to replace doubts about science with doubts about the motives of consensus scientists.

Title: "How climate scepticism turned into something more dangerous"

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/07/climate-change-denial-scepticism-cynicism-politics

Extract: "Doubts about the science are being replaced by doubts about the motives of scientists and their political supporters. Once this kind of cynicism takes hold, is there any hope for the truth?

Last month Donald Trump announced his intention to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate accord. For his supporters, it provided evidence, at last, that the president is a man of his word. He may not have kept many campaign promises, but he kept this one. For his numerous critics it is just another sign of how little Trump cares about evidence of any kind. His decision to junk the Paris accord confirms Trump as the poster politician for the “post-truth” age."
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

6roucho

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 286
  • Finance geek
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #257 on: July 08, 2017, 11:00:32 PM »
I know it's easy to post images of idiots behaving badly, but for crying out loud.



What are we waiting for, assembled in the forum?
 
            The barbarians are due here today.
 
 
Why isn’t anything happening in the senate?
Why do the senators sit there without legislating?
 
            Because the barbarians are coming today.
            What laws can the senators make now?
            Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating.

C.P. Cavafy, Waiting for the Barbarians

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #258 on: July 14, 2017, 02:18:57 AM »
Hey! Congress voted to let the military study climate change!

House defeats amendment to strip climate study from Defense bill
The House voted 185-234 to defeat Peters’ amendment and keep the study in the bill.

Forty-six Republicans voted against Perry’s amendment. Two Republicans, Reps. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), argued against it during floor debate earlier Thursday.

The effects of climate change “are drivers of geopolitical instability and degrade the security of the United States.” Stefanik said.

“We would be remiss in our efforts to protect our national security to not fully account for the risk climate change poses to our bases, our readiness and to the fulfillment of our armed services mission.”
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/341961-house-defeats-amendment-to-strip-climate-study-from-defense-bill
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #259 on: July 14, 2017, 02:23:37 AM »
I know it's easy to post images of idiots behaving badly, but for crying out loud.

<snip>

I read that Marco Rubio (at the left of your photo), dared him to do it. So this was childishness, as much as stupidity.
Such are our congressfolk.  ::)
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #260 on: July 14, 2017, 06:13:07 PM »
The linked NOAA announcement about the AGGI makes no mention of the anthropogenic contribution to the 40% increase since 1990, and it does not note that the AGGI uses a GWP100 of 25 for methane (which is actually over 35).  It looks like Team Trump has put pressure on NOAA management to toe the new Trump Administration spin on science:

"NOAA’s Greenhouse Gas Index up 40 percent since 1990"

http://www.noaa.gov/news/noaa-s-greenhouse-gas-index-up-40-percent-since-1990

Extract: "NOAA’s Annual Greenhouse Gas Index, which tracks the warming influence of long-lived greenhouse gases, has increased by 40 percent from 1990 to 2016 — with most of that attributable to rising carbon dioxide levels, according to NOAA climate scientists."

See also:

"NOAA erases ‘human activity’ from news release on soaring greenhouse gases"

https://thinkprogress.org/noaa-erases-human-activity-from-emissions-release-1ed475d26bcc

Extract: "In a truly shocking news release on its Annual Greenhouse Gas Index, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has erased any reference to “human activity” or fossil fuels. The index monitors the warming influence of greenhouse gases like CO2.

Last year, NOAA’s news release for the index featured the picture of flaring gas from fossil fuel extraction (see top image). The release began by stating, “human activity has increased the direct warming effect of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere by 50 percent above pre-industrial levels during the past 25 years, according to NOAA’s 10th annual Greenhouse Gas Index.”"
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

rboyd

  • ASIF Middle Class
  • Posts: 554
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #261 on: July 14, 2017, 08:23:48 PM »
it does not note that the AGGI uses a GWP100 of 25 for methane (which is actually over 35). 

Its bad enough that the AGGI is going up at 3-4ppm per year this decade, much faster than just CO2, I didn't know that they were also underestimating the methane GWP100 by 40% (with a GWP100 of 35 we would be well past the 500ppm CO2e level [about 520?], maybe that's why they are still using 25?)

I would have thought that the use of a GWP20 would be very instructive, given the short-lived nature of methane in the atmosphere and concerns about triggering feedbacks in the short term.

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #262 on: July 14, 2017, 08:57:15 PM »
Its bad enough that the AGGI is going up at 3-4ppm per year this decade, much faster than just CO2, I didn't know that they were also underestimating the methane GWP100 by 40% (with a GWP100 of 35 we would be well past the 500ppm CO2e level [about 520?], maybe that's why they are still using 25?)

I would have thought that the use of a GWP20 would be very instructive, given the short-lived nature of methane in the atmosphere and concerns about triggering feedbacks in the short term.

Here is a repost from the Human Stupidity thread indicating a CO2-equiv. of 521 ppm:

The linked NOAA website entitled: "THE NOAA ANNUAL GREENHOUSE GAS INDEX (AGGI)" was updated in Spring of 2017 with GHG data through the end of 2016.  I note that if one assumes that the GWP100 for methane is 35 instead of 25 (per AR5), then NOAA's calculated value for the CO2-eq for 2016 would be 521ppm instead of 489ppm; which is a big difference, and one that NOAA should publically acknowledge.

https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi.html

 Global Radiative Forcing, CO2-equivalent mixing ratio, and the AGGI
                         Global Radiative Forcing (W m-2)           CO2-eq
                                                                                     (ppm)        AGGI
Year     CO2     CH4    N2O   CFC12 CFC11 15-minor  Total Total   1990 = 1   %change

2013   1.882  0.496   0.184   0.167   0.059   0.114  2.901   478      1.340        2.0
2014   1.908  0.499   0.187   0.166   0.058   0.116  2.935   481      1.356        1.6
2015   1.939  0.504   0.190   0.165   0.058   0.118  2.974   485      1.374        1.8
2016   1.985  0.507   0.193   0.164   0.057   0.121  3.027   489      1.399        2.5

CH4   ΔF = β(M½ - Mo½) - [f(M,No) - f(Mo,No)]   β = 0.036
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #263 on: July 15, 2017, 03:23:27 AM »
Dept. of Energy chief Rick Perry biased the study with the hope of finding Renewables: Bad; Fossil Fuels: Good.  Will he alter the results to fit his expectations?

Renewable Energy Not a Threat to Grid, Draft of U.S. Study Finds
In April, Perry launched the grid study with an eye to examining whether policies that favor wind and solar energy are accelerating the retirement of coal and nuclear plants critical to ensuring reliable power supplies. With President Donald Trump pledging to reverse regulations that have harmed coal, the study was viewed by critics as a way the administration would justify curtailing the surging expansion of wind and solar power and provide help to coal plants.

But the draft report concludes: "Grid operators are using technologies, standards and practices to assure that they can continue operating the grid reliably."
...
The career officials at the department found that energy efficiency, battery storage and demand response were helping the reliability of the grid, changing it from the way it had operated in the past, but not endangering the provision of electricity, the May draft showed.
...
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-14/renewable-energy-not-a-threat-to-grid-draft-of-u-s-study-finds
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

6roucho

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 286
  • Finance geek
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #264 on: July 15, 2017, 11:01:12 AM »
Trump aims to use UN climate fund for coal plants

The Trump administration is angling to use a United Nations climate change adaptation fund to pay for the construction of coal plants instead, Bloomberg News reports.

An official told Bloomberg that the White House is pushing to use the Green Climate Fund, which the U.S. has contributed $1 billion to, for more "clean coal" power plants around the world.

The Green Climate Fund is a U.N. effort designed to send contributions from rich countries to developing nations who are bracing for the worst impact of climate change.

Some of the programs the GCF has funded include hydropower projects in the Solomon Islands and Tajikistan and a renewable energy push in Egypt. A Trump official told Bloomberg the U.S. would push to spend future money on “clean coal” and other power plants that aim to produce fewer carbon emissions than existing power facilities.

One of President Trump’s main complaints about the Paris climate agreement was the $3 billion pledge the Trump administration made to the GCF. Former President Barack Obama was able to contribute $1 billion before he left office earlier this year, and Trump has said the U.S. will stop future payments to the fund.

But the U.S. still has a seat on the GCF’s board by virtue of its previous contributions. The GCF funds projects on a consensus basis, making it more difficult for the U.S. to push a coal project through without buy-in from other nations.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #265 on: July 15, 2017, 01:52:15 PM »
Fighting back!

Trump’s ‘drill, baby, drill’ energy policies are being met by ‘sue, baby, sue’
President Trump promised to grow jobs by rolling back Obama-era energy and pollution rules. And he’s fulfilling his pledge, but not how he intended. In just six months, Trump’s policies have resulted in a surge in employment — for environmental lawyers.

Since Trump took office, environmental groups and Democratic state attorneys general have filed more than four dozen lawsuits challenging his executive orders and decisions by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Interior Department and other agencies. Environmental organizations are hiring extra lawyers. Federal agencies are requesting bigger legal defense budgets.

The first round of legal skirmishes has mostly gone to the environmentalists. Earlier this month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit blocked the administration from delaying Obama-era rules aimed at reducing oil industry releases of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. On June 14, a federal judge ruled against permits issued to complete construction of the Dakota Access pipeline, a partial victory for the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which claims its hunting and fishing grounds are threatened by the oil pipeline.
...
Democratic attorneys general are now ramping up their own fundraising and are filing or joining in suits against Trump’s environmental, immigration and education policies. AGs such as California’s Xavier Becerra, Pennsylvania’s Josh Shapiro and Washington state’s Bob Ferguson are all raising their profiles with these lawsuits. All are seen as contenders for future seats as governor or U.S. senator.
...
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article161071669.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

TerryM

  • ASIF Upper Class
  • Posts: 1945
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #266 on: July 15, 2017, 10:39:49 PM »
Trump aims to use UN climate fund for coal plants

The Trump administration is angling to use a United Nations climate change adaptation fund to pay for the construction of coal plants instead, Bloomberg News reports.

An official told Bloomberg that the White House is pushing to use the Green Climate Fund, which the U.S. has contributed $1 billion to, for more "clean coal" power plants around the world.

The Green Climate Fund is a U.N. effort designed to send contributions from rich countries to developing nations who are bracing for the worst impact of climate change.

Some of the programs the GCF has funded include hydropower projects in the Solomon Islands and Tajikistan and a renewable energy push in Egypt. A Trump official told Bloomberg the U.S. would push to spend future money on “clean coal” and other power plants that aim to produce fewer carbon emissions than existing power facilities.

One of President Trump’s main complaints about the Paris climate agreement was the $3 billion pledge the Trump administration made to the GCF. Former President Barack Obama was able to contribute $1 billion before he left office earlier this year, and Trump has said the U.S. will stop future payments to the fund.

But the U.S. still has a seat on the GCF’s board by virtue of its previous contributions. The GCF funds projects on a consensus basis, making it more difficult for the U.S. to push a coal project through without buy-in from other nations.
I'm guessing the bolded should read Obama administration?


Needing a consensus WRT spending GCF's funds probably means that no money will be spent until Trump gets a coal project through. They might have been better of without Obama's well meaning, but poisonous billion dollar gift.


Terry

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #267 on: July 17, 2017, 07:31:37 PM »
The linked article discusses how the Koch Brothers are influencing Trump's attacks on climate action:

This is how the Kochs’ anti-renewable agenda becomes White House policy

https://thinkprogress.org/obscure-think-tank-gains-influence-1644feb0b813

Extract: "Koch-tied officials “got their wish” with Trump’s attacks on climate action, environment."
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #268 on: July 18, 2017, 12:32:02 AM »
The U.S. Congress wants to cancel satellites that would show for certain the earth is warming.

Donald Trump's $10 trillion climate mistake
Climate change skeptics claim that the science is unsettled while simultaneously proposing to end studies that would settle it. This posture would be ironic and slightly amusing if it wasn't so flagrantly dangerous to the future of human civilization on Earth.

The latest iteration of this ludicrous hypocrisy was on full display last week when the House appropriations committee carved another $50 million from NASA's Earth science division, on top of the already severe 2018 cuts requested by the Trump administration. If eventually endorsed by Congress, the reductions will leave Earth scientists unable to fill gaps in data considered crucial to understanding the state of the planet, thus perpetuating the "unsettled science" that deniers profess to abhor....
http://theweek.com/articles/712207/donald-trumps-10-trillion-climate-mistake
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

TerryM

  • ASIF Upper Class
  • Posts: 1945
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #269 on: July 18, 2017, 06:02:29 PM »
Blame Trump, he's guilty as hell, but save some of the rage for the Republicans. My understanding from the above is that the Republican Congress is proposing cuts over and above what Trump has asked for.


Trump is terrible, Republicans are even worse.


Terry

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #270 on: July 18, 2017, 07:54:14 PM »
This bipartisan group in the U.S. Congress is finding climate change issues they can (mostly) agree on -- and vote in a block to make a difference. 
See Reply #258 above about the defense bill defeat:
https://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/index.php/topic,1858.msg120748.html#msg120748

Curbelo’s gang of moderate Republicans defeats anti-climate change legislation
Taurel said that funding for green energy, preparing for the effects of climate change and stopping offshore drilling are three policy areas where moderate Republicans could join Democrats, but that more Republicans must speak about ways to reduce carbon emissions.

This is called the Climate Solutions Caucus, so that’s the key kind of yardstick they should be measured by,” Taurel said. “To what extent are they supporting solutions to climate change?”

Curbelo argues he’s doing his part by urging his colleagues to buck conservatives in Congress.

“I assume that now when we get into appropriations season there will be many amendments where I assume our group is going to be critical to blocking bad policy,” Curbelo said last month.
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article161467618.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Archimid

  • ASIF Middle Class
  • Posts: 678
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #271 on: July 20, 2017, 05:06:48 PM »
I’m a scientist. I’m blowing the whistle on the Trump administration.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/im-a-scientist-the-trump-administration-reassigned-me-for-speaking-up-about-climate-change/2017/07/19/389b8dce-6b12-11e7-9c15-177740635e83_story.html

I am not a member of the deep state. I am not big government.

I am a scientist, a policy expert, a civil servant and a worried citizen. Reluctantly, as of today, I am also a whistleblower on an administration that chooses silence over science.

Nearly seven years ago, I came to work for the Interior Department, where, among other things, I’ve helped endangered communities in Alaska prepare for and adapt to a changing climate. But on June 15, I was one of about 50 senior department employees who received letters informing us of involuntary reassignments. Citing a need to “improve talent development, mission delivery and collaboration,” the letter informed me that I was reassigned to an unrelated job in the accounting office that collects royalty checks from fossil fuel companies.
I am an energy reservoir seemingly intent on lowering entropy for self preservation.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #272 on: July 21, 2017, 08:44:31 PM »
Quoting the Reply #243 above:
Eric Holthaus:  Whoa. France just launched makeourplanetgreatagain.fr and is offering grants of up to 1.5 million Euro for climate scientists to move there.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ericholthaus/status/873229691385020416

Now this:
Hundreds of climate scientists, including many from the United States, have applied to work in France under a €60-million (US$69-million) scheme set up by the country's president, Emmanuel Macron, after his US counterpart Donald Trump rejected the Paris accord on global warming. And Germany has announced that it will set up a similar programme to lure researchers.

Macron launched his ‘Make Our Planet Great Again’ initiative on 8 June, seeking to entice researchers in other countries to France with offers of 4-year grants worth up to €1.5 million. Six weeks on, the programme has been flooded with applicants, says Anne Peyroche, a biologist and the chief research officer of the CNRS, France’s national basic-research agency.
...
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-01713-4
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #273 on: July 22, 2017, 08:17:22 PM »
Trump Nominates Climate-Denying, Conservative Talk Show Host as U.S. Department of Agriculture's Top Scientist
Clovis, an early advisor to the Trump campaign, has a master's in business administration and a doctoral degree in public administration, and appears to have no published scientific or academic work to his name. The position he is nominated for, which is tasked to provide scientific direction and uphold "scientific integrity" at the USDA, has previously been held by distinguished scientists with deep expertise in certain issue areas.

In a 2014 interview, Clovis called evidence of climate change "junk science," claiming that he has "enough of a science background to know when I'm being boofed."
https://www.ecowatch.com/sam-clovis-usda-2462483880.html
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Archimid

  • ASIF Middle Class
  • Posts: 678
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #274 on: July 22, 2017, 09:26:40 PM »
Trump considers anyone who shares an opinion with him an expert. What a freaking fool.
I am an energy reservoir seemingly intent on lowering entropy for self preservation.

TerryM

  • ASIF Upper Class
  • Posts: 1945
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #275 on: July 23, 2017, 12:48:58 PM »
He makes Trump look slender and fit. A good man to be seen with.
Terry

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #276 on: July 23, 2017, 04:38:14 PM »
“It is easy to use delusions to obstruct and destroy. Building something is hard. Building something valuable means thinking about consequences and confronting weaknesses in an ideological framework. Building something invites consequences. Republicans cannot govern because Republicans lack any respect for facts. Tilting at windmills is much easier than constructing them.”

Why Republicans Cannot Replace the ACA, Or Accomplish Anything Else
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrisladd/2017/07/20/why-republicans-cannot-replace-the-aca-or-accomplish-anything-else/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

pileus

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 337
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #277 on: July 25, 2017, 04:49:09 PM »
Here is the chair of the House Committee on Science and Technolgy, Lamar Smith, celebrating the upside of climate change and CO2.  Pretty typical approach as ignorant deniers begin to see the overwhelming evidence, and then pivot to claiming it might be happening, but it's good!

House Science Committee Chair Says Climate Change Is A Good Thing

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_59765a54e4b0e201d577466d/amp?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=dlvr.it

“The benefits of a changing climate are often ignored and under-researched,” Smith said. “Our climate is too complex and the consequences of misguided policies too harsh to discount the positive effects of carbon enrichment.”

Increased carbon dioxide, Smith writes, promotes photosynthesis, resulting in a “greater volume of food production and better quality food” and “lush vegetation” that “assists in controlling water runoff, provides more habitats for many animal species, and even aids in climate stabilization, as more vegetation absorbs more carbon dioxide.” Warmer temperatures, he notes, results in longer growing seasons 

Smith goes as far as to make a case for why a rapidly melting Arctic, which scientists warn could cost tens of trillions of dollars by the end of this century, is a positive thing.

“Also, as the Earth warms, we are seeing beneficial changes to the earth’s geography,” he writes. “For instance, Arctic sea ice is decreasing. This development will create new commercial shipping lanes that provide faster, more convenient, and less costly routes between ports in Asia, Europe, and eastern North America. This will increase international trade and strengthen the world economy.”

pileus

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 337
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #278 on: July 25, 2017, 09:17:39 PM »

6roucho

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 286
  • Finance geek
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #279 on: July 26, 2017, 05:42:42 AM »
“Also, as the Earth warms, we are seeing beneficial changes to the earth’s geography,” he writes. “For instance, Arctic sea ice is decreasing. This development will create new commercial shipping lanes that provide faster, more convenient, and less costly routes between ports in Asia, Europe, and eastern North America. This will increase international trade and strengthen the world economy.”
Such a brazen [and slippery smooth] segue by Smith, from the hard denial of warming to the denial of consequences. Evidence [as if any was needed] of the expediency of the whole movement. It'll be interesting to see whether the reality of warming is even debated in the Red-Team / Blue-Team show, or simply ignored, a sacrificial part of the argument, that has outlived its usefulness.

pileus

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 337
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #280 on: July 27, 2017, 03:38:19 PM »
A commentary on the broader assualt against not only science, but knowledge and truth itself.

America's Golden Age of Stupidity

https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/global-opinions/wp/2017/07/25/americas-golden-age-of-stupidity/

Of course, it is not just science under siege. More broadly the administration attacks facts and evidence wherever they do not suit their policy views. All evidence-based communities are under attack — the intelligence community, law enforcement, think tanks and journalists. Attacks come in all forms — disregard for data, ad hominem attacks on the messengers and their motives, deflections and false analogies.

The opposite of knowledge is ignorance. But the willful disregard of knowledge — regardless of motive — is stupidity. That is because those who battle facts are at war with reality. It is an unwinnable proposition. Furthermore, specialized knowledge, particularly that of scientists, is essential if we are to do what leaders must, anticipate change, understand its consequences and harness the opportunities it presents. Trump, in waging a systematic campaign to rid the government of the experts and ideas he sees as threats to his agenda, has done more than just usher in a Golden Age of Stupidity. He is unwittingly asking a question it doesn’t take an expert to figure out: “What happens when you lobotomize the world’s leading power?”

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #281 on: July 28, 2017, 02:07:01 AM »
"It's been six months, and people are still crying at their desks."

Scott Pruitt's Crimes Against Nature
Trump's EPA chief is gutting the agency, defunding science and serving the fossil-fuel industry
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/scott-pruitt-is-gutting-the-epa-serving-fossil-fuel-industry-w494156
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

NevB

  • ASIF Lurker
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #282 on: July 28, 2017, 09:51:15 AM »
Why the Scariest Nuclear Threat May Be Coming from Inside the White House

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/07/department-of-energy-risks-michael-lewis/amp

Donald Trump’s secretary of energy, Rick Perry, once campaigned to abolish the $30 billion agency that he now runs, which oversees everything from our nuclear arsenal to the electrical grid. The department’s budget is now on the chopping block. But does anyone in the White House really understand what the Department of Energy actually does? And what a horrible risk it would be to ignore its extraordinary, life-or-death responsibilities?


This is a good example of the damage to science and the danger that could result from the Trump regime's lethal combination of blind ideology, arrogance, incompetence and ignorance.

Pmt111500

  • ASIF Upper Class
  • Posts: 1035
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #283 on: July 28, 2017, 10:03:18 AM »
I'm beginning to see the good in Perry's plan. He's likely aiming to destroy US from within to get his own fiefdom ::) :P ;D.  Which could be good for the planet. (you may ask yourself how this is science, and you might be right to say it isn't. This is just what happens if political commentary is allowed in science threads)

On to contribute some other political asshattery elsewhere. Remember, anyone under 21 and from US isn't allowed to comment.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2017, 10:09:57 AM by Pmt111500 »
A quantity relates to a quantum like camel's back relates to camel's _______ ? (back, vertebra, vertebral tendon, spinal disc, paralysis)

magnamentis

  • ASIF Upper Class
  • Posts: 1212
    • View Profile
    • Nexpaq Modular ARA iOS Software Mobile Computing Phones Philosophy Ethics Numerology Mikrocirkulation Vaskular Therapie Gesundheit Blut Gesundheit Schmerzen Multipelsklerose Diabetes Immunsystem Fibromyalgie
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #284 on: July 28, 2017, 04:40:46 PM »
"It's been six months, and people are still crying at their desks."

Scott Pruitt's Crimes Against Nature
Trump's EPA chief is gutting the agency, defunding science and serving the fossil-fuel industry
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/scott-pruitt-is-gutting-the-epa-serving-fossil-fuel-industry-w494156


and once the crying stops it's not because they got happy in the mean time but because they were either ousted or have quit by themselves with perhaps a few in hospital with nervous breakdowns
« Last Edit: July 29, 2017, 12:25:12 PM by magnamentis »
http://magnamentis.com
Knowledge, Understanding & Insight Are Among The Best Sources For Personal Freedom & Vitality !

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #285 on: July 29, 2017, 01:44:55 AM »
U.S. House Hacks Away at Renewable Energy and Efficiency Programs
The U.S. House of Representatives brushed aside Democrats' efforts to preserve federal funding for clean energy and energy efficiency as it voted to approve a large spending bill Thursday that would slash those programs by 45 percent while maintaining federal support for fossil energy research and development.
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/27072017/congress-budget-house-vote-renewable-energy-efficiency-programs-fossil-fuel-spending
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #286 on: July 31, 2017, 04:05:46 PM »
Experts slam Trump administration’s flawed analysis for repealing water pollution rule
“Everything about this repeal is bogus and slapdash.”
https://thinkprogress.org/clean-water-rule-economic-analysis-problems-3def20a591df
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #287 on: August 02, 2017, 12:24:43 AM »
"Trump officials want to add a coal display to the EPA museum, because of course. Oh, and by the way, did you know there’s an EPA museum?"

grist.org/briefly/trump-officials-want-to-add-a-coal-display-to-the-epa-museum-because-of-course/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #288 on: August 02, 2017, 09:39:14 PM »
Top EPA official resigns over direction of agency under Trump
A top Environmental Protection Agency official resigned Tuesday in protest of the direction the EPA has taken under President Trump.

Elizabeth "Betsy" Southerland ended her 30-year run at the agency with a scathing exit letter in which she claimed that "the environmental field is suffering from the temporary triumph of myth over truth." She last worked as the director of science and technology in the Office of Water.

"The truth is there is NO war on coal, there is NO economic crisis caused by environmental protection, and climate change IS caused by man's activities," Southerland wrote, directly rejecting many of Trump's claims.

Southerland said that since EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt took over the agency, dozens of regulations designed to protect the environment had been repealed, and Trump's proposed budget cuts to the agency would devastate its ability to enforce existing protections and create new ones.

She took aim in particular at Trump's demand that two federal regulations be struck from the books for every new one added.

"Should EPA repeal two existing rules protecting infants from neurotoxins in order to promulgate a new rule protecting adults from a newly discovered liver toxin?" she wrote. "Faced with such painful choices, the best possible outcome for the American people would be regulatory paralysis where no new rules are released so that existing protections remain in place." ...
http://thehill.com/news-by-subject/energy-environment/344825-top-epa-official-resigns-over-direction-of-agency-under
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #289 on: August 02, 2017, 10:33:54 PM »
Scientists are being purged at the Department of the Interior for telling the truth:

Title: "Donald Trump and Ryan Zinke Are Purging Climate Scientists for Telling the Truth"

https://www.thenation.com/article/donald-trump-and-ryan-zinke-are-purging-climate-scientists-for-telling-the-truth/

Extract: "Dozens of senior officials have been reassigned at the Department of the Interior, including Dr. Virginia Burkett, who contributed to the IPCC reports that won the Nobel Peace Prize."
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #290 on: August 02, 2017, 11:04:13 PM »
Pruitt is not only distorting the truth, but he is also complicit in distorting the EPA's scientific integrity policy:

Title: "EPA panel clears Pruitt’s climate denial by misquoting scientific integrity policy"

https://thinkprogress.org/epa-panel-clears-pruitts-climate-denial-by-misquoting-scientific-integrity-policy-2d1db8a35c3a

Extract: "'Pruitt is in violation of basic standards of ethical conduct,’ says leading climatologist Michael Mann."
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

wili

  • ASIF Upper Class
  • Posts: 1988
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #291 on: August 08, 2017, 07:08:10 PM »
And now:

 US federal department is censoring use of term 'climate change', emails reveal


 series of emails show staff at Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service advised to reference ‘weather extremes’ instead
"A force de chercher de bonnes raisons, on en trouve; on les dit; et après on y tient, non pas tant parce qu'elles sont bonnes que pour ne pas se démentir." Choderlos de Laclos "You struggle to come up with some valid reasons, then cling to them, not because they're good, but just to not back down."

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #292 on: August 10, 2017, 09:04:35 PM »
“We know that he does not grasp the science of climate change, but this report now illustrates that Scott Pruitt is unwilling or unable to carry out the basic statutory mission of the EPA, which is enforcement of our environmental laws.”

Penalties against polluters down 60 percent under Trump
https://thinkprogress.org/penalties-against-polluters-down-60-percent-under-trump-ea0bd62b4435/amp/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #293 on: August 14, 2017, 01:01:50 AM »
Alaskan towns at risk from rising seas sound alarm as Trump pulls federal help
Communities in danger of falling into the sea say assistance from Washington has dried up: ‘It feels like a complete abdication of responsibility on climate change’
The US government’s withdrawal from dealing with, or even acknowledging, climate change may have provoked widespread opprobrium, but for Alaskan communities at risk of toppling into the sea, the risks are rather more personal.

The Trump administration has moved to dismantle climate adaptation programs including the Denali Commission, an Anchorage-based agency that is crafting a plan to safeguard or relocate dozens of towns at risk from rising sea levels, storms and the winnowing away of sea ice.

Federal assistance for these towns has been ponderous but could now grind to a halt, with even those working on the issue seemingly targeted by the administration. In July, Joel Clement, an interior department official who worked with Alaskan communities on climate adaptation, claimed he had been moved to a completely unrelated position because of the administration’s ideological hostility to the issue.

“We were getting down to the brass tacks of relocation [of towns at risk] and now work has just stopped,” Clement told the Guardian. He has lodged an official complaint over his reassignment.

“Without federal coordination from Washington DC, there isn’t much hope. This will take millions of dollars and will take years, and these people don’t have years. I think it’s clear I was moved because of my climate work. It feels like a complete abdication of responsibility on climate change.”

According to the Army Corps of Engineers, 31 Alaskan communities face “imminent” existential threats from coastline erosion, flooding and other consequences of temperatures that are rising twice as quickly in the state as the global average. A handful – Kivalina, Newtok, Shishmaref and Shaktoolik – are considered in particularly perilous positions and will need to be moved. ...
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/aug/10/alaska-coastal-towns-sea-level-rise-climate-change
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #294 on: August 16, 2017, 11:17:26 PM »
"The White House posted the text of the executive order last night. In just 28 words, one section of the order reverses stricter flood standards set by Obama, making Americans and businesses more vulnerable to heavy rains and sea-level rise."

Trump Promised Beautiful Bridges and Roads. Now He’s Putting Them in Harm’s Way.
He’s “throwing out any guarantee that our infrastructure will be safe.”
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2017/08/trump-promised-beautiful-bridges-and-roads-now-hes-putting-them-in-harms-way/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • ASIF Royalty
  • Posts: 9100
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #295 on: August 17, 2017, 01:00:56 AM »
EPA plans to rewrite Obama-era limits for coal power plant wastewater
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency says it plans to scrap an Obama-era measure limiting water pollution from coal-fired power plants.

A letter from EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt released Monday as part of a legal appeal said he will seek to revise the 2015 guidelines mandating increased treatment for wastewater from steam electric power-generating plants.

Acting at the behest of electric utilities who opposed the stricter standards, Pruitt first moved in April to delay implementation of the new guidelines. The wastewater flushed from the coal-fired plants into rivers and lakes typically contains traces of such highly toxic heavy metals as lead, arsenic, mercury and selenium. ...
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/epa-plans-rewrite-obama-era-limits-coal-power-plant-wastewater/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

AbruptSLR

  • ASIF Emperor
  • Posts: 12759
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #296 on: August 21, 2017, 05:21:41 PM »
Evidently, Donnie John feels that he doesn't need any more climate change advise as the Electoral College made him the 'winner' (& 'winners' decide what is 'fake news' and what is not):

Title: "Report: Trump dissolves climate change advisory panel"

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-trump-dissolves-climate-change-advisory-panel/

Extract: "The Trump administration has decided to dissolve a federal advisory panel that contributes to a report that measures the current and future impacts of climate change on the U.S., The Washington Post reports."
“It is not the strongest or the most intelligent who will survive but those who can best manage change.”
― Leon C. Megginson

TerryM

  • ASIF Upper Class
  • Posts: 1945
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #297 on: August 23, 2017, 12:31:51 PM »
Driving toward the cliff with blinders on is less frightening.
Terry

pileus

  • ASIF Citizen
  • Posts: 337
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #298 on: August 24, 2017, 01:46:56 AM »
Resignation letter from State Dept Science Envoy.  Note the first letter of each paragraph.

Archimid

  • ASIF Middle Class
  • Posts: 678
    • View Profile
Re: Trump Administration Assaults on Science
« Reply #299 on: August 26, 2017, 02:55:05 AM »
US energy agency asked scientists to scrub references to climate change

http://www.nature.com/news/us-energy-agency-asked-scientists-to-scrub-references-to-climate-change-1.22513

Multiple researchers who received grants from the US Department of Energy (DOE) have been asked to remove references to “climate change” and “global warming” from the descriptions of their projects.
I am an energy reservoir seemingly intent on lowering entropy for self preservation.