For a non-scientist, separating facts from fear-mongering can be challenging.
This site -
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pro-science/ - lists about 50 science aggregator sites that have been verified and meet their criteria for accurate science information:
... These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias, but adhere to scientific principles.
The list includes primary sources and links to climate news aggregators like:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Climate Action Tracker
Climate Central
Climate Feedback
The DeSmogBlog
National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)
National Geographic
National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Nature
New Scientist
Phys.org
Public Library of Science (PLOS)
ResearchGate
ScienceAlert
ScienceBlogs
SciCentral
SciCheck
Science Daily
ScienceDirect
Science Magazine
Science Media Centre
Science News
Science Trends
Scientific American
Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Skeptical Inquirer
Skeptical Science
Skeptoid
The Watchers
TreeHugger
Understand Reality Through Science
Union of Concerned Scientists
US Department of Energy – Office of Science
World Meteorological Organization
They also identify pseudoscience/conspiracy; alt-right; right leaning; left leaning; and questionable sources. It might help separating the wheat from the chaff.
My only complaint is that they havn't listed Neven's Arctic Sea Ice Blog
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pro-science/