Support the Arctic Sea Ice Forum and Blog

Author Topic: SpaceX  (Read 421836 times)

NeilT

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6356
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 388
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3700 on: April 09, 2024, 11:19:21 PM »
Yes that was a thought I had too.

Not just landing though. We saw how much velocity was lost when oft-1 started excavating the OLM rather than taking off.

However. I don't expect humans to do most of the work.  That is a task for Optimus.

Also it has been a contention of mine for some time that the first intelligence on Mars will be artificial. The majority of ships are going to Mars to be cannibalised for materials. This is best done by AI bots before the first human lands.
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.

Robert A. Heinlein

morganism

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 1837
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 226
  • Likes Given: 133
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3701 on: April 10, 2024, 12:09:15 AM »
Humans aren't allowed outside because of planetary protection protocols.

OT; Russia's new launch platform (rocket) had a hold, again. Not inspiring confidence.

nadir

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 2243
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 250
  • Likes Given: 37
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3702 on: April 10, 2024, 12:10:48 AM »
Optimus? On the Moon? What year are you talking about?

Optimus would-be a delicate robot for domestic use isn’t it? Shouldn’t you use tougher machines for hard work on the Moon?

Man I try to stay away from these threads but your thoughts are so laughable, particularly when you bring Tesla imaginary products to scene. It’s hilarious.

Anyway, keep joking away.

NeilT

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6356
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 388
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3703 on: April 10, 2024, 05:50:30 PM »
Nadir, your views often come crashing down on the shore of reality as these companies deliver and deliver and deliver.

The one real failure in recent years was Solar Roof.  It is not dead but Covid certainly did not help and neither did huge inflation.

I suspect it has a far better future in new builds where developers can specify fixed sizes and configurations and 3rd party installers can do the install on the new roof.

Other than that it is a matter of time to deliver, not will to deliver or lies about products.

I see that Toyota has just shipped a brand new 4Ranger off roader with diesel and Hybrid.  After 15 YEARS of not updating the product.

In 15 years Optimus will be developed beyond recognition from the current product apart from it being a bipedal robot.
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.

Robert A. Heinlein

nadir

  • Nilas ice
  • Posts: 2243
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 250
  • Likes Given: 37
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3704 on: April 10, 2024, 08:27:34 PM »
Nadir, your views often come crashing down on the shore of reality as these companies deliver and deliver and deliver.
What exactly has been delivered since I comment on Tesla since circa early 2022, which is when I started commenting in these threads? Apart from the Cybertruck (very rushed delivery).

Optimus is a joke. The last video folding clothes was clearly scammy, Musk had to rapidly fix his lying tweet with a clarification when someone told him the human operator’s hands were visible in the video. Who believes in Optimus progress when such a level of deception is patent after all the hype for already two years or so?

And you talk about Optimus on the Moon? Are you really that naive? Or are you a religious person, only that instead of believing in God you believe in the supremacy of “these companies”?

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3705 on: April 12, 2024, 04:47:02 PM »
Quote
Hard to get well out to sea without impacting the wetlands and all the protected species.
Easy.  The flights back to land are coming down over the ocean, not over land — for that very reason. (Among others.)

See ➡️ pic.twitter.com/bkxS7fNSnt  1 min. SpaceX photorealistic render of booster returning & caught by chopsticks!
 
https://x.com/spacex/status/1776669517860786631

Also:  Although the two oil rigs SpaceX bought for potential offshore landing pads have been scrapped, the company still has plans for that.  A slide from Elon’s recent April update is below. ⬇️

——-
Talking about soft landings - surely a high priority for a moonbase is to make a really strong stable landing pad. Them thar rocks are a big pain.
 
Starship HLS will have self-leveling landing legs, SpaceX says.  And its huge size and weight means that rocks that would topple smaller craft will mostly be crushed by Starship.  But yes, companies are designing the technology to use lunar regolith to manufacture hard surfaces for landing; and for local operations, to decrease the problem of dust contamination.

Quote
Not just landing though. We saw how much velocity was lost when oft-1 started excavating the OLM rather than taking off.
One more time: No SuperHeavy booster will be used on the Moon or Mars.  It’s only needed on Earth, due to Earth’s stronger gravity. 

Also, re its speed off the pad: OFT-1 purposely ramped the booster engines slowly, the thought being that it would be a lesser risk to the pad and the rocket with its early engines.  But the slower departure caused the major damage.  Now they ramp and go.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2024, 05:06:18 PM by Sigmetnow »
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3706 on: April 16, 2024, 02:53:25 AM »
—- ”And there we freaking have it! #SpaceX just broke a new record. 20 flights and landings with Falcon 9 booster 1062.”
Welcome back to A Shortfall of Gravitas!
🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
➡️ pic.twitter.com/nM01nj74ny  13 sec: the landing.

SpaceX
This booster’s previous missions include GPS III Space Vehicle 04, GPS III Space Vehicle 05, Inspiration4, Ax-1, Nilesat 301, OneWeb Launch 17, ARABSAT BADR-8, and now 13 Starlink missions
4/12/24, https://x.com/spacex/status/1778964420246577414

     —-
Michael Sheetz
ULA CEO Tory Bruno's view on the economics of reusing rockets by propulsive flyback (the way SpaceX does):
"Our estimate remains around 10 flights as a fleet average to achieve a consistent breakeven point ... and that no one has come anywhere close."
 
Eric Berger
Tory’s words of wisdom on reuse seem silly today. SpaceX just launched its sixth rocket in eight days. That’s as many as ULA has in 17 months.
4/12/24, https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1778968730334064683
Textpics at the link.

 
—- And soon, Starship
Chris Bergin - NSF
It looks like the chopsticks are getting upgraded—this large actuator has been lifted for installation. Maybe this is in preparation for the potential catch on IFT-5?
4/12/24, https://x.com/nasaspaceflight/status/1778810582746948025
 
➡️ pic.twitter.com/kycsW11ALH 10 sec.

 
====
 
—- Meanwhile, we had the last flight of ULA’s Delta IV Heavy rockets.
 
The most metal of rockets has gone into the great mosh pit in the sky
Eric Berger - 4/10/2024
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/04/the-most-metal-of-rockets-has-gone-into-the-great-mosh-pit-in-the-sky/
 
A comment:
< I think that the fact that you can point to a specific Falcon 9 rocket and say "This rocket has flown more times than all of the Delta IV Heavy's combined" says quite a bit about how our view on rockets and reusability have changed. The D4H is an amazing rocket that does the job well -- a now it is even easier to see what a shame it was to just throw all that work in the ocean after one time.
 
   —
Eric Berger
Callout on the NROL-70 webcast: "Just passed through the Karman line." Further confirmation that Blue Origin is going to buy ULA?
4/9/24, https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1777742927193579985
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3707 on: April 19, 2024, 07:37:51 PM »
Eric Berger:  NASA is quietly considering major changes to Artemis III.
It is definitely concerning that Orion’s heat shield issues are not yet resolved

NASA may alter Artemis III to have Starship and Orion dock in low-Earth orbit
If it were to happen, a revised Artemis III mission could echo Apollo 9.
Eric Berger - 4/19/2024
Quote
Although NASA is unlikely to speak about it publicly any time soon, the space agency is privately considering modifications to its Artemis plan to land astronauts on the surface of the Moon later this decade.

Multiple sources have confirmed that NASA is studying alternatives to the planned Artemis III landing of two astronauts on the Moon, nominally scheduled for September 2026, due to concerns about hardware readiness and mission complexity.

Under one of the options, astronauts would launch into low-Earth orbit inside an Orion spacecraft and rendezvous there with a Starship vehicle, separately launched by SpaceX. During this mission, similar to Apollo 9, a precursor to the Apollo 11 lunar landing, the crew would validate the ability of Orion and Starship to dock and test habitability inside Starship. The crew would then return to Earth. …

An unrealistic timeline
The space agency's date for Artemis II is optimistic but potentially feasible if NASA can resolve the Orion spacecraft's heat shield issues. A lunar landing in September 2026, however, seems completely unrealistic. The biggest stumbling blocks for Artemis III are the lack of a lander, which SpaceX is developing through its Starship program, and spacesuits for forays onto the lunar surface by Axiom Space. It is not clear when the lander or the suits, which NASA only began funding in the last two to three years, will be ready.

There are also concerns about the complexity of Artemis III. It will require a number of previously untested steps, including an Orion-Starship rendezvous and docking in lunar orbit; humans flying inside of Starship in space; Starship going down to the surface and coming back up to dock with Orion; and more. Mission planners would be more comfortable if they could, in NASA parlance, "buy down the risk" of Artemis III by validating some of these delicate maneuvers before the lunar landing mission.

This is why NASA has asked SpaceX to look at a mission where Orion would rendezvous with the Starship vehicle in orbit around Earth. Such a mission—whether called Artemis IIS or Artemis III—would solve a lot of problems for the space agency and appears to be the preferred option at this time. Critically, it would verify the ability of the two spacecraft to dock in an environment where, if there were a problem, it would be much easier for the crew to return safely home. It would also validate the ability of astronauts to live inside Starship and perform some ascent and descent maneuvers.

Perhaps just as importantly, such a mission would allow the space agency to avoid a long gap between Artemis II and Artemis III. No one is quite certain how long it will take SpaceX to deliver a Starship vehicle that is capable of landing safely on the Moon and then taking back off. The company is known for moving very fast in the development phase, but it still has a tremendous amount of work to do with Starship.

SpaceX must get the vehicle flying regularly—which it is close to doing—and then begin conducting refueling tests. These are necessary so that SpaceX can refuel Starship in orbit for a lunar mission, and nothing similar has ever been attempted on this scale. SpaceX must then learn to operate Starship in deep space, land on the Moon, and, critically, take off from the lunar surface a few days later to re-rendezvous with Orion so the astronauts can come home. All of this can be solved by engineering and testing, but it will take time.

A difficult decision
A mission profile that has an Earth-orbit rendezvous with Orion would obviate the need for a lot of that work. Instead, SpaceX would simply need to demonstrate the capability to get Starship into low-Earth orbit with a functional life support system. This is very doable in the next two years.
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/04/nasa-may-alter-artemis-iii-to-have-starship-and-orion-dock-in-low-earth-orbit/
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

NeilT

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6356
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 388
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3708 on: April 19, 2024, 10:16:29 PM »
I read that. But as I understand it the spacesuits are a much bigger risk than SpaceX making it with HLS.

If SpaceX have HLS to dock with in LEO, then they have HLS which can go to the moon.  But LEO docking doesn't require a moon capable spacesuit.
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.

Robert A. Heinlein

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3709 on: April 20, 2024, 04:13:55 PM »
I read that. But as I understand it the spacesuits are a much bigger risk than SpaceX making it with HLS.

If SpaceX have HLS to dock with in LEO, then they have HLS which can go to the moon.  But LEO docking doesn't require a moon capable spacesuit.

Quote
It would be easy, but unfair, to blame SpaceX and Axiom for the delays to future Artemis missions. Congress created the SLS rocket with an authorization bill back in 2010, but Boeing actually had been receiving funding for related work dating back to 2007. By contrast, NASA did not start funding work on the Starship lunar lander until late 2021, and the Axiom spacesuits until 2022. In some sense, these developments are as technically demanding as the SLS rocket work, if not more so.
 
Boeing says it will cut SLS workforce “due to external factors”
"Boeing is reviewing and adjusting current staffing levels."
Eric Berger - 4/18/2024
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/04/amid-schedule-uncertainty-boeing-will-shed-workers-on-sls-rocket-program/

   —-
 
The more interesting take on this is:  while it would be good to test out Orion’s docking systems in LEO,  they could test out HLS Starship in LEO using Dragon to send a crew to dock with it.  Which SpaceX could likely do even before an Orion test would happen.  And having done that, more folks will come to the conclusion:  why spend the billions required to use SLS/Orion at all?

The Polaris (Dragon) EVA suits should be revealed this summer.  No doubt SpaceX is working on their own suits for the Moon and Mars surface.
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

NeilT

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6356
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 388
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3710 on: April 21, 2024, 02:26:18 PM »
Elon has already said that SpaceX could do the spacesuit be cause they are working on their own.

Dragon to HLS and HLS to the moon is possible, but would require some changes to allow it to get back.

Like a fuel.depot at the moon as well as in LEO.

Mind you, a fuel depot at the moon is a given due to the expectation of multiple landings/ascents for the Same HLS.  They would just need a bigger one.

The longer it takes NASA to get ready the more likely SpaceX will overtake them.
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.

Robert A. Heinlein

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3711 on: April 21, 2024, 07:04:03 PM »
Elon has already said that SpaceX could do the spacesuit be cause they are working on their own.

Actually, he wrote that SpaceX “could do it if need be.” The Dragon EVA suit they are working on is for space, and requires a tether to Dragon, it’s not a surface suit.  SpaceX Moon/Mars suits might be in the design stage but he didn’t want to publicly diss the Axiom suit project…. 🤷‍♀️

Quote
Michael Sheetz
NASA's Inspector General says delays in spacesuit development are another factor making a 2024 astronaut Moon landing impossible.
With $420M spent and another $625M expected, suits won't be "ready for flight until April 2025 at the earliest."
Report: oig.nasa.gov/docs/IG-21-025…
 
Elon Musk
SpaceX could do it if need be
8/10/21, https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1425100482779942936

 
Dragon to HLS and HLS to the moon is possible, but would require some changes to allow it to get back.

Like a fuel.depot at the moon as well as in LEO.

Mind you, a fuel depot at the moon is a given due to the expectation of multiple landings/ascents for the Same HLS.  They would just need a bigger one.

It will be some years until moon landings become regular events.  Most of the early missions will probably be uncrewed SpaceX flights, deploying science, rovers, and maybe Starlink.  Some Ships will remain on the lunar surface.  Some will stay briefly, then return rocks and etc. to LEO or Earth surface, but a lunar depot might not be required for a while yet.

Quote
Everyday Astronaut
How will lunar starship refuel? It needs to go back to Earth orbit, and then get refueled by multiple tankers to do that round trip each time right? Can’t make methane on the moon sans a large cow farm, right? 😂

Elon Musk
Starship propellant is ~78% oxygen, so an O2 plant on the moon would be enough. Otherwise, we could brute-force it with tankers to low Earth orbit. That’s probably faster.
8/25/20, https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1298426245991063554
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

NeilT

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6356
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 388
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3712 on: April 22, 2024, 04:48:12 AM »
whilst the could do it if needs be was the comment, there had been other information about needing to make suits for Mars.  SpaceX will be doing that themselves.  Although Mars is a somewhat different suit than the moon suit where there is no atmosphere.
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.

Robert A. Heinlein

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3713 on: April 27, 2024, 02:14:01 AM »
Storm-chasers reporting on the tornado outbreak in the U.S. midwest, happening now.

Martin Viecha
Starlink: Made for some serious s***
4/26/24, 7:16 PM  https://x.com/martinviecha/status/1783998676861616288
 
⬇️ Actual photo below from: pic.twitter.com/0BA4WDju8G 

Nick Gorman
Incredible tornado intercept just now north of Lincoln Nebraska!! @ryanhallyall @SevereStudios
4/26/24, 4:06 PM  https://x.com/nickgormanwx/status/1783950735434031233
 
➡️ pic.twitter.com/j8GAtPVObc  2 min. Intercept!
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3714 on: April 28, 2024, 12:59:53 AM »
SpaceX
Targeting two Falcon 9 launches from Florida this weekend → spacex.com/launches
Up first, Falcon 9 will launch the European Commission’s Galileo L12 mission on Saturday from pad 39A
 
Then on Sunday, a Falcon 9 launch of 23 @Starlink satellites from pad 40
4/26/24, 5:40 PM. https://x.com/spacex/status/1783974479527543186

 
SpaceX is set to launch two European Galileo navigation satellites at 8:34pm EDT tonight.
Based on SpaceX's mission page, this mission will operate under an NRO-type level of secrecy. Weird. All the previous Galileo flights on Soyuz and Ariane were fully public.
Watch ➡️  https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=galileol12
 
4/27/24, 4:46 PM  https://x.com/stephenclark1/status/1784323234776654311

"Due to the additional performance required to deliver the [Galileo] payload to medium Earth orbit, this mission marks the 20th and final launch for this Falcon 9 first stage booster."
4/26/24, 5:46 PM  https://x.com/jeff_foust/status/1783975938088177908

Falcon 9 B1060, seen launching in the background on its 14th flight, will support it's 20th, and final mission [tonight]. This will set a new record for the most flown booster to support a commercial mission, and tie the current flight mark of 20 launches currently held by B1062.
➡️ pic.twitter.com/PsbW7shW8s  40 sec. Drone view of booster droneship return as F9 launches in background!

 
=====
 
Last Tuesday:
Quote
SpaceX
Falcon 9’s first stage has landed on the Just Read the Instructions droneship, completing Falcon’s 300th landing!
4/23/24, 6:26 PM  https://x.com/spacex/status/1782898782885339562
➡️ pic.twitter.com/1YHqiHWjkN  24 sec. Nice view!
 
—-
Eric Berger:
 
300 rockets
2,700 Merlin engines
15,000 metric tons
 
That's a lot of recycling in less than a decade.

Elon Musk
Amazing amount of useful work by the SpaceX team
4/24/24, https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1783186152583016882
 
SpaceX has now landed more boosters than most other rockets ever launch
Eric Berger - 4/24/2024,
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/04/spacex-has-now-landed-more-boosters-than-most-other-rockets-ever-launch/

 
—- CRS-30: After delays due to bad weather in the splashdown zone, Cargo Dragon undocking is set for tomorrow
At Undock-24h both #Hawthorne and #Houston have given a Go for Undocking (and later splashdown) of #CRS30 tomorrow at 17:05 UTC. There will be another weather briefing at 05:00 UTC (undock-12h). #ISS
4/27/24, 2:10 PM  https://x.com/ian_benecken/status/1784283947125399805
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3715 on: April 28, 2024, 02:55:11 AM »
Falcon 9 has launched the European Commission’s Galileo L12 mission to orbit
Re-Watch:  https://x.com/spacex/status/1784378155299692794
 
SpaceX
Liftoff! ➡️ pic.twitter.com/NolsTPxBBU  27 sec
 
Due to the additional performance required to deliver the payload to medium Earth orbit, this mission marks the 20th and final launch for this Falcon 9 first stage booster
   —-
The last time a first stage was expended during a Falcon 9 mission was 146 flights ago in November 2022. On most Falcon 9 missions, enough propellant remains in the first stage after stage separation to enable landing, recovery, and ultimately reuse on future missions
   —-
We’re working toward qualifying our fleet of Falcon boosters and fairings to support 40 missions each. Increasing Falcon's flight count provides valuable information on repeated reuse, a critical element for making life multiplanetary with Starship
4/27/24, 8:40 PM. https://x.com/spacex/status/1784382036096242138
 
Fairing separation confirmed. This marks the 200th mission to use flight-proven fairings!
4/27/24, 8:38 PM  https://x.com/spacex/status/1784381758399554041
 
This Falcon 9 first stage has launched ~200 spacecraft as part of our Rideshare program, supported 13 @Starlink missions to help connect people all around the world with high-speed, low-latency internet, sent a lunar lander to the Moon, and more. In total, this Falcon delivered 228+ metric tons to Earth orbit and beyond
➡️ pic.twitter.com/IDul5eJIum  22 sec:  ~ 1 sec from each of this booster’s 19 prior launches!
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3716 on: May 01, 2024, 07:27:13 PM »
—- Starship
Eric Berger
According to NASA's Amit Kshatriya, SpaceX is working toward the fourth Starship flight test before the end of May. Says IFT3 was "a great success."
4/26/24, 10:59 AM  https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1783873621858963928
 
According to Kshatriya, SpaceX will perform a Starship-to-Starship cryogenic propellant transfer test in 2025.
4/26/24, 11:09 AM https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1783876119852110149
⬇️ pic.twitter.com/S6f17Rr6zy  Slide: Starship HLS Prop Transfer Demo.  Mission Architecture; Path to Demonstration.

Starship Target
• Launches first
• Receives propellant during transfer
• Has active docking mechanisms*
• Has passive relative navigation features
• Performs de-orbit burn

Starship Chaser
• Launches second
• Transfers the propellant to target
• Has passive docking mechanisms*
• Has active relative navigation sensors
• Performs de-orbit burn

[* This would mean the less numerous depot ships would be constructed with all the supplemental hardware, and the many future filler ships would thus require less.]

 
Elon Musk
Full & rapid reusability of booster & ship and orbital refilling of ship are the 2 fundamental technologies we aim to solve by the end of next year.
Those are the critical pieces necessary to make life multiplanetary.
4/26/24, 11:25 AM  https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1783880139887239390
 
——
Eric Berger
How to fuel a rocket in space.
4/26/24, 11:04 AM. https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1783874694971617756
⬇️ Black slide below from: pic.twitter.com/7rSthPc1Ss 
Black slide saved: Starship HLS Propellant Transfer Demo ConOps

 
—- Preps at Starbase    
SpaceX is ramping up efforts to clean up and refit the orbital launch site for Starship's fourth flight. GSE tanks were removed and scrapped, and the OLM is getting upgrades to support the next mission.
➡️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbWZmdxzf5g&feature=youtu.be   “Tank Scrapped”

—-
Booster 11 hot stage ring is outside Mega Bay 1 this morning. 🔥🚀🔥
➡️ pic.twitter.com/pFn8RJywaH 
4/24/24, 10:36 AM  https://x.com/bocachicagal/status/1783142889326797229

Ship 30 is rolling out to the launch site for its Static Fire test.
➡️  pic.twitter.com/Jo60tlIk5K 
5/1/24, 1:10 AM  https://x.com/nasaspaceflight/status/1785537363810107533
 
Eric Ralph
I always feel bad for the TPS team during the ship static fire rollout / heat shield funeral procession 😅 with any luck, the Massey's static fire stand will minimize or entirely end TPS damage during engine testing, and Ship 30 will be the last to go through this process lol
4/30/24, https://x.com/13ericralph31/status/1785487694765904349
 
Zack Golden
Full speed test of the chopsticks!
I can't wait for the first catch attempt. Seeing the sticks move this quickly makes me a lot more confident this will work.
The bounce at the end is a bit worrying, but this is something that will be improved with the shorter arms in the future.
In the meantime, they should have plenty of time to come to rest before the booster halts its downward velocity. It might get a pretty decent love tap by the side of the landing rail, but hopefully the rubber padding will be re-installed which should help soften the impact.
📽️: @LabPadre  ➡️ pic.twitter.com/QiR9onjEXw 
 
4/30/24, 12:42 PM  https://x.com/csi_starbase/status/1785348973147906116
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3717 on: May 01, 2024, 07:30:35 PM »
Falcon 9
 
—- EUSPA confirms the successful launch of two Galileo satellites, but carefully avoids mentioning how they launched.
The Falcon Booster on its 20th flight was expended in order to place the satellites into their MEO orbit.

Eric Berger
Really hard to overstate the fact that not only are some of Europe's most valuable satellites (Galileo navigation) launching on a Falcon 9 rocket today, but they're doing so on [the booster’s] 20th mission. Unimaginable even two or three years ago.
4/27/24, 4:20 PM. https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1784316700604670282

Eric Berger: “The launcher”
Quote
🇪🇺 EUSPA - EU Agency for the Space Programme
🛰28 April: the EU launched 2 new Galileo satellites!
Earlier this morning, the Galileo satellites were ejected from the launcher's upper stage & reached the Holding Point. They are currently managed by #EUSPA as part of the Launch & Early Orbit Phase (LEOP).
🧵1/4 pic.twitter.com/X9xAQXrH2S 
4/28/24, https://x.com/eu4space/status/1784445305846419959
 
< spacex has sacrificed a booster 🫡 for your mission that you couldn't do yourself because the throwaway ariane 6 is not ready to fly….
      
EUSPA takes over the latest Galileo satellites in Launch and Early Orbit Phase (LEOP), after their successful injection into orbit
https://www.euspa.europa.eu/newsroom-events/news/euspa-takes-over-galileo-satellites-leop

Quote
Thomas Schumann
 
I sent the press people of EUSPA an email, asking them: “I can’t see from your press release, what rocket the satellites were launched on, however. Can you help me with that information?”
 
Their answer: “During the night between Saturday 27 to Sunday 28 April 2024 at 2:34 am (Brussels time), 2 new Galileo satellites were successfully launched by Space X from the Kennedy Space Centre at Cape Canaveral (US). Ariane-6 is the baseline launcher for Galileo. Since the discontinuation of launch services of Ariane-5 and Soyuz from the French Guiana spaceport, and until Ariane-6 is available, Europe must temporarily rely on non-EU launchers to ensure the programmatic needs of strategic infrastructures like Galileo during the temporary unavailability of EU launch vehicles in order to ensure the continuity of Galileo services”
4/29/24, 7:37 PM  https://x.com/tschnn/status/1785091160438194442
 
< I guess another Falcon 9 has another synonym now: “Non-EU launcher”

Eric Berger (commenting on a headline):
Correction. Should be, "The launcher launches Galileo navigation satellites."
4/28/24, https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1784617774775406594

===
ISS
 
SpaceX Cargo Dragon CRS-30 departed from the ISS and was recovered successfully last weekend.
 
Watch SpaceX Dragon cargo capsule depart the ISS
https://www.space.com/spacex-dragon-cargo-mission-crs-30-iss-departure

➡️ pic.twitter.com/0ZdpOhS2ud  22 sec. Helicopter lands on wave-tossed Dragon recovery ship Megan during rehearsals for CRS-30 return.

Jeff Foust
A couple items of interest from the NASA Advisory Council Human Exploration and Operations committee meeting this morning:…
- Award of a US Deorbit Vehicle contract planned for end of June.
4/25/24, 10:30 AM  https://x.com/jeff_foust/status/1783503828337189178
 
 
——
Just Read the Instructions droneship delivered Falcon 9 B1080 back from Starlink 6-52 just before 3am.
By 5am, the booster was flying again! [Via a crane. ;) ]
Another tight turnaround coming up...
➡️ pic.twitter.com/fdr4CYbnfd  13 sec. Booster lift from JRTI to the shore. Night. 🎥 nsf.live/spacecoast
4/20/24

JRTI departs for Starlink 6-53!
Rapid turnaround for the droneship. Not sure what the record is for the time between delivering one mission and departing for the next but 8 hrs and 15 mins must be close!
(nsf.live/spacecoast) ➡️ pic.twitter.com/fZ1qq2VrSg  10 sec: arrival/departure.
4/20/24

➡️ pic.twitter.com/63oiAdq7kx  11 sec. 😲 Unique perspective! A Port Canaveral crowd enjoys the launch of Starlink 6-54. 4/28/24, https://x.com/spaceoffshore/status/1784708449747501382

——
➡️ pic.twitter.com/OmDRPyjHlq 48 sec. During this evening's Starlink 6-54 launch, conditions were perfect for an absolutely spectacular vapor cone!
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3718 on: May 01, 2024, 07:34:53 PM »
NEW SPACE STATIONS NEWS!
 
Jeff Foust
Also from the NAC HEO meeting: NASA says Axiom Space has requested a modification to its agreement with NASA to change the sequence of modules they plan to add to the ISS to allow them to become a free-flyer after two module launches. 
4/25/24, 11:25 AM  https://x.com/jeff_foust/status/1783517653002342552
 
➡️  pic.twitter.com/4oGmHQJSOW  Slide with new plans.

—-
VAST
Quote
Max Haot
Excited to show that we are building the world’s first commercial space station @vast Haven-1! This month we completed our VAST Haven-1 primary structure pathfinder which proved we could build in house all the critical geometries, transitions, and interfaces of Haven-1. Next up - building the primary structure qualification article which will undergo pressure and load tests.
 
⬇️ pic.twitter.com/uF73g79wry 
4/29/24, 3:31 PM  https://x.com/maxhaot/status/1785029107585311126
 
 
—-
Gravitics
 
Gravitics is pleased to announce that we are developing orbital platforms for the United States Space Force.
 
More info here: https://www.gravitics.com/news/tacrsd2p2
 
4/25/24, 3:33 PM  https://x.com/graviticsinc/status/1783579988593447320

Founded in 2021, Gravitics, Inc. is an aerospace company that designs and manufactures large space structures, including pressurized space station modules–the building blocks for scalable space platforms. Gravitics is enabling a new era in human and robotic utilization of low earth orbit and beyond. Visit gravitics.com to learn more.

Quote
… Gravitics will leverage its commercial space station product architecture to develop orbital platforms that will enable rapid and flexible response options for the United States Space Force. Gravitics’ commercial space station modules can support a wide range of military and civilian applications, including in-space rapid response applications.
 
“We are looking at all options to meet the mission on tactically relevant timelines. The Gravitics space station module offers an unconventional and potentially game-changing solution for TacRS,” said Lt Col Jason Altenhofen, Space Safari’s Director of Operations. “As we look into the future, the innovative use of commercial technologies will be an important aspect to solving some of our toughest challenges.”

 
—-
China
 
China 'N Asia Spaceflight 🚀𝕏 🛰️
Shenzhou-18 entered the space station at ~21:04UTC on April 25. They will share the habitable space with Shenzhou-17 for ~4 days until their departure scheduled for April 30.
4/25/24, 6:18 PM  https://x.com/cnspaceflight/status/1783621625495318904
⬇️ pic.twitter.com/82nNTQtrMV  Pic below.

Andrew Jones @AJ_FI
The Shenzhou-17 spacecraft undocked from Tiangong space station early UTC today. The crew will soon land back on Earth.  Coverage here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCl1d4NBqdU&feature=youtu.be
4/30/24, 4:48 AM

Jonathan McDowell
Shenzhou-17 landed in China at 0946 UTC spacenews.com/chinas-shenzho…
4/30/24, 9:30 AM  https://x.com/planet4589/status/1785300595164770434

⬇️ VAST pathfinder;  Taikonauts.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2024, 07:59:50 PM by Sigmetnow »
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3719 on: May 01, 2024, 07:42:04 PM »
SatCons and Space Travel

Eric Berger
It looks like the price tag for Europe's sovereign internet constellation has doubled. And the big kids are fighting.
5/1/24, https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1785685751209824661
 
Europe’s ambitious satellite Internet project appears to be running into trouble
A new report in a German publication, Handelsblatt, provides information on some likely causes of the delay. The report indicates that the cost estimate for the Interconnectivity and Security by Satellite (IRIS²) constellation has doubled from an initial estimate of 6 billion euros to 12 billion. Additionally, the project is exposing long-running fault lines between Germany and France when it comes to European space policy.
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/05/europes-ambitious-satellite-internet-project-appears-to-be-running-into-trouble/

====
Eric Berger
Could solar thermal propulsion really become a thing?
4/30/24, https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1785319208147927181

New space company seeks to solve orbital mobility with high delta-v spacecraft
"If we’re going to have a true space economy, that means logistics and supply services."
Eric Berger - 4/30/2024, 9:30 AM
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/04/new-space-company-seeks-to-solve-orbital-mobility-with-high-delta-v-spacecraft/

< This is an excellent example of what's going to happen when Starship makes delivering hundreds of tons to orbit routine. Whomever has the foresight to figure out the no-nonsense, fundamental business cases in orbit such as logistics, plumbing (no escape from pipes!), debris removal etc will enjoy enormous first mover advantages.
 
<< Well the math will have to include the fact that it will be far cheaper $ to deliver a new satellite to orbit than it may be to maneuver or try to extend the life of an existing one. So the math will be more around preventing or extending the replacement hard cost of a satellite, rather than cost of a satellite + delivery to station.


=========
SpaceX currently has human spaceflight seats available for Earth Orbit missions in late 2024.
You book a flight to Space, get a custom SpaceX suit made for you and spend 3-6 days orbiting Earth. Citizens can also book a flight to the ISS🚀


More info: https://www.spacex.com/humanspaceflight
4/29/24, 2:33 PM  https://x.com/sawyermerritt/status/1785014540910096865
pic.twitter.com/esjCywuoMo 

➡️ https://www.spacex.com/humanspaceflight
OUR MISSIONS
All Dragon and Starship missions have the ability to conduct scientific research to improve life back on Earth as well as raise awareness to a global audience.

EARTH ORBIT
ORBIT FREQUENCY
Every 90 minutes
MISSION DURATION
3 - 6 days
ALTITUDE
300 – 500 km
SEATING
2 - 4 passengers
CUPOLA
46” diameter / 360° views
CARGO / SCIENCE
Up to 192 kg cargo
Power / Data / Comm available
 
Book your flight to start exploring Earth orbit. Seats and on-orbit research opportunities available starting late 2024. Inquire below.

   —
SPACE STATION
ORBIT FREQUENCY
Every 90 minutes
MISSION DURATION
10 days
ALTITUDE
~400 km
SEATING
4 passengers
CARGO / SCIENCE
Up to 192 kg cargo
Power / Data / Comm available
Book your flight to visit and conduct research on the space station. Missions available starting as early as 2025. Inquire below.

  —
MOON
MISSION DURATION
7 days
ALTITUDE
384,400 km from Earth
SEATING
Up to 12 passengers, with private quarters
VOLUME
1,000 m3
Nosecone area available for entertainment, manufacturing, and scientific opportunities
Book your flight to travel to the Moon's orbit. Click Join a Mission below to inquire on mission availability

   —
MARS
DAY LENGTH
24 hrs 37 min
FORCE OF GRAVITY
38% of Earth
AVG DISTANCE FROM EARTH
225 Mkm / 140 Mmi
Book your flight to travel to Mars. Click Join a Mission below to inquire on mission availability.


 
====
Eric Berger
"We have 50 years of studies..." says @nujoud.
4/26/24, 1:05 PM
⬇️ pic.twitter.com/dQXOWxFG11 Slide with timeline “stamps” of major space events.
 
Although to be fair, I honestly don't think NASA should make any hard humans-to-Mars decisions until we have a handle on how well Starship works. Because if it does, it is dumb to base a Mars transportation system on anything else.
4/26/24, https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1783910035296329973
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3720 on: May 01, 2024, 07:52:34 PM »
Artemis/HLS

Eric Berger
Really appreciate @RepFrankLucas asking [NASA Admin Nelson], at the top of today's NASA budget hearing, about potentially changing Artemis III to a non-lunar landing.
➡️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br_pBlgsv3c&feature=youtu.be
2 min.
4/30/24, 12:12 PM  https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1785341392631345365

Here's the story he's referencing.
NASA may alter Artemis III to have Starship and Orion dock in low-Earth orbit | Ars Technica
https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/04/nasa-may-alter-artemis-iii-to-have-starship-and-orion-dock-in-low-earth-orbit/
 
====
Loren Grush
For @BW I did a check in on SpaceX and Blue Origin's plans for landing humans on the moon for NASA. They both rely on launching multiple refueling flights to fill up a spacecraft -- either a depot or a tug - in Earth orbit to fuel their landers.
5/1/24, https://x.com/lorengrush/status/1785667108052845034
 
Who Will Win the Moon Race? Elon Musk’s SpaceX vs. Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin - Bloomberg
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-05-01/who-will-win-the-moon-race-elon-musk-s-spacex-vs-jeff-bezos-blue-origin

Paywalled

Loren Grush @lorengrush
For Blue Origin it's four to eight refueling flights, for SpaceX it's "ten-ish." Obviously those numbers will be refined as development progresses. Still a ways to go!
5/1/24, https://x.com/lorengrush/status/1785667609754587386
 
Wall Street Silver
The concept of Blue Origin launching four to eight refueling flights within a short time frame is fantasy. They lack the culture, talent and leadership to do it.
 
SpaceX doing it is plausible. They have proven it with Falcon 9.

5/1/24, https://x.com/wallstreetsilv/status/1785675961721122928
 
< Hear me out: one Starship cargo with a hydrogen fuel tank to refuel one Blue Moon lander.
 
   —-
Eric Berger: 🧐
 
⬇️ pic.twitter.com/NwdGwFs776 An outdated “Immensely complex & high risk” graphic
5/1/24, 9:52 AM  https://x.com/sciguyspace/status/1785668498133295219
 
< The snarky perspective about 32ft vs 126ft from the hatch to the surface is also curious.  Both require something more complicated than a ladder.  Therefore the distance is mostly irrelevant.  In reality, the safety measures for 126ft are likely to be much more robust.
<< The Apollo 15 feather and hammer demonstration from the top of the Starship HLS elevator would/will be amazing.

5/5
« Last Edit: May 01, 2024, 08:02:50 PM by Sigmetnow »
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3721 on: May 02, 2024, 01:34:58 AM »
—- Thursday May 2 Will Be A Busy Day!
 
SpaceX
Targeting Thursday, May 2 for Dragon’s port relocation at the @Space_Station and back-to-back Falcon 9 launches from California and Florida

5/1/24, 6:18 PM. https://x.com/spacex/status/1785795913304494258
    —
Up first, Crew-8 will board Dragon, undock from the @Space_Station, and redock ~45 minutes later. Webcast starts at 7:30 a.m. ET [This frees up the port Starliner must use for its upcoming Crew Flight Test.]
  —
Later that morning, Falcon 9 will launch the @Maxar 1 [Worldview Legion 1 & 2] mission from SLC-4E in California → http://spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=maxar1
[Thu May 2, 11:36 a.m. PDT (2:36 p.m. EDT / 1836 UTC)]
  —
Thursday evening, Falcon 9 is targeted to lift off from pad 40 in Florida, delivering 23 @Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit → https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=sl-6-55
[Thu May 2/3, 2024 9:49 p.m. EDT (0149 UTC)]

 
====
 
—- A Deep Dive ;) into NASA’s Starship HLS mockup in the Neutral Buoyancy Lab pool
 
Also, details about NASA’s EVA suits and determining the best pressure to use, and how the suits are configured to simulate microgravity while in the pool.
 
How We Answer This Question is More Important Than You’d Think- Smarter Every Day 296
1h17m Mar 31, 2024.
 



⬇️ Screencaps below from ~46min.
Large circle: diameter of Starship HLS
Smaller circle: the airlock.
Rectangle: the elevator
« Last Edit: May 02, 2024, 02:54:36 PM by Sigmetnow »
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3722 on: May 02, 2024, 02:50:40 PM »
The latest NASA Office of the Inspector General report details problems that occurred during Artemis I.

NASA's Readiness for the Artemis II Crewed Mission to Lunar Orbit - NASA OIG
https://oig.nasa.gov/office-of-inspector-general-oig/audit-reports/nasas-readiness-for-the-artemis-ii-crewed-mission-to-lunar-orbit/

"The test flight revealed anomalies with the Orion heat shield, separation bolts, and power distribution that pose significant risks to the safety of the crew." 
  —
"NASA identified more than 100 locations where ablative thermal protective material from Orion’s heat shield chipped away unexpectedly during reentry into Earth’s atmosphere."
5/1/24, https://x.com/wapodavenport/status/1785781171688771814
⬇️ Images below

—-
Other findings include:  loss of communications to the spacecraft for hours due to maintenance and upgrades needed to the aged and over-subscribed Deep Space Network;  multiple instances of power disruption caused by radiation;  greater than expected damage to launch infrastructure; degradation and loss of data and photos; and loss of parachutes and the forward bay cover, which sunk after splashdown before they could be retrieved and studied for any damage.
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

NeilT

  • First-year ice
  • Posts: 6356
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 388
  • Likes Given: 22
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3723 on: May 02, 2024, 08:21:47 PM »
Reading the article I realised I missed this.

Quote
it is only thanks to the inspector general's office that the public finally got a full accounting for the cost of a single Space Launch System and Orion launch—$4.2 billion.

Total Starship development program is estimated at $10bn.

Just slightly more than TWO full up Artemis launches.
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.

Robert A. Heinlein

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3724 on: May 04, 2024, 04:23:07 PM »
—- SpaceX EVA Suit reveal!
For the Polaris program.
 
Quote
SpaceX
 
The SpaceX Extravehicular Activity (EVA) suit → spacex.com/updates
#Maythe4thBeWithYou
 
➡️ pic.twitter.com/peETlLCcDP  1 min The suit!  Rotating joints at forearm and shoulder.
   —
At ~700 km above Earth, the EVA suit will support the @PolarisProgram’s Polaris Dawn crew in the vacuum of space during the first-ever commercial astronaut spacewalk
   —
Evolved from the Intravehicular Activity (IVA) suit, the EVA suit provides greater mobility, a state-of-the-art helmet Heads-Up Display (HUD) and camera, new thermal management textiles, and materials borrowed from Falcon’s interstage and Dragon’s trunk
  —
Building a base on the Moon and a city on Mars will require millions of spacesuits. The development of this suit and the execution of the spacewalk will be important steps toward a scalable design for spacesuits on future long-duration missions as life becomes multiplanetary
5/4/24, 10:05 AM  https://x.com/spacex/status/1786759044948189202

SpaceX
Tune in today ~3:00 p.m. ET to hear the crew discuss the mission on Spaces
5/4/24, 10:08 AM  https://x.com/spacex/status/1786759813440897490
« Last Edit: May 04, 2024, 05:46:40 PM by Sigmetnow »
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3725 on: May 04, 2024, 04:46:59 PM »
Quote
Polaris
More @SpaceX photos of the new Extravehicular Activity (EVA) suit the Polaris Dawn crew will wear during their upcoming mission. Let us know your questions below ahead of today’s X Spaces event with the crew and SpaceX team👇
5/4/24, 10:10 AM  https://x.com/polarisprogram/status/1786760319471161688
➡️ pic.twitter.com/2ptb2IuQJo  More pics; one below — looks like that Display been hardened, so as to withstand the vacuum when the capsule is open to space. And workable using the thicker suit gloves.
 
Quote
SpaceX
Chat with the Polaris Dawn crew and SpaceX team today ~3:00 p.m. ET on Spaces → https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1YqJDgBaOyNGV
5/4/24, 10:25 AM  https://x.com/spacex/status/1786764079002161572

Quote
Jared Isaacman @rookisaacman
 
After 2+ years, the @SpaceX EVA suit has been unveiled. We are thrilled to have contributed to the dev & testing and excited to wear them on Polaris Dawn for the first commercial EVA. A huge shoutout to the team working tirelessly on this! As we aim for the moon, Mars, and beyond, we'll need plenty of suits. Big step in that direction. May the 4th be with you! 🚀
5/4/24, 10:15 AM  https://x.com/rookisaacman/status/1786761535739617523
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.

Sigmetnow

  • Multi-year ice
  • Posts: 25977
    • View Profile
  • Liked: 1161
  • Likes Given: 432
Re: SpaceX
« Reply #3726 on: Today at 03:27:15 AM »
The SpaceX EVA Suits discussion on 𝕏

Polaris
Recording of today’s Spaces event with the Polaris Dawn crew and SpaceX team
5/4/24, 4:12 PM. https://x.com/polarisprogram/status/1786851486703538242
 
https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1YqJDgBaOyNGV

Notes:
Now that Axiom mission and Crew-8 uphill flight are complete, targeting Polaris launch for early summer.  The specially-built Dragon for the Polaris mission is already at KSC.

The Trajectory:  launch to highly elliptical orbit. 190km x 1200 km, raise apogee to 1400km, highest since Apollo, just below Van Allen radiation belt.  7 orbits, doing research, then lower altitude back to 700km for the rest of the flight, including the spacewalk.

5 action-packed days, with 40 experiments & science.
Examples: measurements at the high altitude to better understand that environment. 
Use a camera to capture X-ray images, testing for use with future medical diagnosis while in space. 
Research space motion sickness - help prepare future fliers.
Group testing: neuro-ocular syndrome.  Why do vision changes occur on long duration space flights?
 
Planning an amazing test using Starlink for high band-width comms;  exciting alternative to NASA’s aging, slow and over-subscribed TDRS system. [See above re Orion’s difficulties.]

The suits:
Some advances developed for the SpaceX EVA suit have already been incorporated into Crew-8’s IVA suits.  Eventually, there will only be one suit for Dragon.  EVA suit has special mobility joints, rotators on shoulders, arms, wrists that STAY SOFT AND FLEXIBLE WHEN UNPRESSURIZED, so no there are no metal parts causing discomfort during IVA use.  [Unlike NASA’s and Boeing’s suits….]  Helmet cameras.  Head Up Display on the visor shows pressure, temperature, O2, EVA timer.  This is the first suit design, so expect iterations and block upgrades.
In the future: Might the HUD have checklists?  Augmented reality?  [Think: showing the way home in the dark….]

No water pool used for suit simulations.  SpaceX needed to move faster than the traditional Neutral Buoyancy Lab testing; besides, using a pool means you have to alter the suit to create microgravity-like conditions.  [See the NASA suit video above.]  Instead, Hawthorne has a “vertical simulator” accurate enough that tapping with a finger results in movement similar to microgravity.  Rigging a Dragon hatch on its side in that simulator allowed for EVA egress and ingress practice.

How long will the spacewalk be?  About two hours includes venting the capsule, and repressurizing.  Two members will go through a series of tests outside the spacecraft.  This also validates the accuracy of the testing method used in their simulator environment, for future training.
Tested the Dragon regime in a vacuum chamber, completely depressurized for a full EVA duration, flowed O2 to four simulated suits, repressurized.   We have a good safety margin on top of that.

Pre-breathe protocol?  Since we don’t have an airlock, can’t use the usual ISS procedures.  [But suits need to be at low pressure, else movement is too difficult.]
We lower Dragon’s pressure slowly beforehand, and increase pO2.  Like visiting a mountain city, it’s not uncomfortable. 
Movies show a person throwing on a suit and immediately going out — we’re getting closer to this.

Quote
Elon Musk
Our EVA suit will look even better, but with a jetpack for maneuvering
5/4/24, https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1786829373422837974
People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.