Problems with riding 2 horsesEDIT: latest Nico Sun graph increases difference on anomalies in Snow Cover Extent between Nico & Environment CanadaWe have two data sets on snow cover extent.
-Environment Canada
- Analysis by Nico Sun.
Environment Canada uses an average of the years 1998/99 through 2011/12
Nico Sun uses an average of 2000 to 2019.
They use different data sources and processing.
Environment Canada
Data are derived from the operational global snow depth analysis run at the Canadian Meteorological Centre, Environment and Climate Change Canada Canada, since 1998. The CMC analysis is based on optimal interpolation of real-time climate station snow depth observations merged with background information from a simple snow model, as described in Brasnett (1999). This snapshot is a contribution to the Global Cryosphere Watch (GCW) programme of the World Meteorological Organization. (Brasnett, B. 1999. A global analysis of snow depth for numerical weather prediction, Journal of Applied Meteorology 38:726-740.)
Nico Sun uses the NOAA / NSIDC analyses.
Nico Sun shows a Snow Cover Extent (SCE) anomaly of minus 2 million Km2.
Environment Canada gives no numerical figure but the graphs show SCE at or or little bit above average.
I would go for Nico's analysis except Environment Canada has graphs on Snow Water equivalent (i.e. snow mass).
Graphs attached to illustrate the difference.
click to enlarge