Yes, complexity means more things that can go wrong. But the Tesla is a new design, from a new company. Their new patents are ushering in updated technology for a new era. Given that they are not playing it safe by using existing technology, I think a "break-in"/learning period is to be expected, and doesn't mean the product was designed to fail.
These early Tesla owners know the car is on the leading edge -- and Tesla knows it must be ready to respond to problems. This doesn't feel like "planned obsolescence" to me:
Consumer Reports also found that customers rate Tesla service and loyalty as the best in the world. Close communication with our customers enables Tesla to receive input, proactively address issues, and quickly fix problems. Over-the-air software updates allow Tesla to diagnose and fix most bugs without the need to come in for service. In instances when hardware needs to be fixed, we strive to make it painless.
Despite the problems, our data show that Tesla owner satisfaction is still very high: Ninety-seven percent of owners said they would definitely buy their car again.
Neven, I can see you value simplicity and dependability.
EVs will get there! But the first of anything has the toughest job -- and the most to prove.