Not a single word on methane, nor carbon dioxide. A few occurrences of 'carbon'. Are the other conclusions trustworthy? At the very least, I'd have expected to see a graph on atmospheric components on the 'atmosphere'-section, but apparently this is too much for the researchers taking part on this economical report on fish stocks and caribou hunting. (shut up) Also there's not a single bit on how to farm watermelons in the long arctic summer on the poor soils and nothing about how to build on a land that's not frozen. (shut up) I think the report is a bunch of political whoo-haa, designed to not cross paths with the vested interests of polar bear hunters and baby seal killers, not to talk about anything of the GMO salmon release designed to withstand corexit and occasional blowouts. (SHUT UP) I think I should calm down (YES plese) and start using as much petroleum as I humanely can to increase the general noise level hereabouts. (That would be nice, wouldn't it) I think I'll drive to see the damage done by the storm two days ago on the west coast today, this gusted on locations at the level of category one hurricane.(you do that)