First, and the most obvious, what will emissions look like when we move completely from fossil fuels and rely on energy storage?
The lifetime carbon footprint for solar and wind will be much smaller than it is today. And it's really small already. Most of the carbon emissions from the wind and solar industry come from the grid use of fossil fuels and transportation's almost total use of FF. As we move to electricity powered transportation and a 100% RE grid all that carbon stays in the ground.
Second, and an issue that should be taken more seriously, how will volatile and unpredictable weather from a warming world affect wind and solar.
Studies have suggested that we should see little change in wind resources on a global level. In some places winds may become weaker or stronger but that can be largely dealt with by changing turbine blade length/design.
Solar panels will produce a little less electricity in hotter weather. The amount of area needed for solar panels will likely be more than offset by increases in panel efficiency.
Something I'm observing here at the southern end of the PNW is that there seems to be less coastal fog in the summer. I don't know if that is extending further north, but if so then solar is going to be more productive in this limited area.
I stuck that in as an indication that things will vary, improve in some places, be degraded in others. Overall things may not be heavily impacted.
BTW, offshore wind turbines are designed to withstand a Category 3 hurricane. These things are not fragile.
Since this is the nuclear thread, we might want to think about impact to nuclear energy. There's the obvious problem of raising sea levels and more frequent flooding. That means we should expect increased outages from poorly sited reactors.
And as temperatures rise cooling will become less efficient, lowering output. Plus temperature required shutdowns will increase.