F Tnioli,
I've come across very little connecting the ENSO to Arctic sea ice, see
here for example. Where researchers have to zoom in on regions and resort to advanced math like wavelets it's safe to say the effect is small and that other factors far outweigh it.
Considering the 1998 super ENSO - It is worth noting that September 1998 was a local peak of NSIDC sea ice extent, 1999 was down on 1998 and the following years were similar in minimum extent to 1999.
In terms of PIOMAS volume, after 1998 there was a continued drop in volume, but Lindsay & Zhang put this down to ice albedo feedback, triggered by the PDO, and AO prior to 1998, not the ENSO. The running sum of interanual differences in NSIDC Extent starts a downwards movement after 1997.
But the impact after 1998 on global temperature has been a flattening of the increase in temperature after about 2002, so I struggle to see how Arctic sea ice loss is strongly affected by the ENSO.
Siffy,
You may be right, isn't there a lag of 3 months with global temperature (don't quote me on that I may be getting mixed up with Pinatubo's cooling influence).
LMVader,
I wouldn't say that DMI is 'way' below normal, it's only a few degrees. Much of the edges of the pack is up to 2.5 to 5degC above normal. The large region of blue on the plot below is due to the distortion caused by the grid points nearing the pole itself - which is colder than average.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/map/images/fnl/sfctmpmer_01a.fnl.htmlJD Allen questions HYCOM thickness, my concern is that its thickest ice seems to be too thick. However the thickness of much of the first year ice, around 2m thick, is believable. And I suspect the situation off Siberia is real.
http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hycomARC/navo/arcticictnnowcast.gifWarming to around zero starts to happen now in recent years and seems to be a factor in the PIOMAS spring volume loss anomaly that has been a feature of the post 2010 years (see attached graphic). With next month's PIOMAS data release we should be able to see the loss start, but we'll have to wait for June's data (released July) to see how big it is.
Fingers crossed for a big one.