Happy New Year 2024 (and sorry for the forum being offline some hours) /DM
Here's a link to a Chris Reynolds discussion on ice growth calculations, and another to a post in his "Slow Transition" thread about Lebedev and Billelo and related issues.http://dosbat.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-simplest-model-of-sea-ice-growth.htmlhttps://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/index.php/topic,933.msg58049.html#msg58049I would ask that further discussion of this very important issue continue in a different existing thread, or start a new one if needed.Make a search for Lebedev and Billelo to help in locating a suitable venue.
Quote from: paolo on April 20, 2020, 03:53:55 PMGlen Koehler,I think that the formula given by John_The_Elder in the previous post: "Thickness (cm) = 1.33 * FDD (°C)0.58", is relative to a starting situation without ice. If at the beginning there is already an ice thickness to use the formula you have to add to the FDD the value that gives the thickness already present (and the influence of the thickness in the formula is given by the exponent 0.58).Nico Sun quotes this formula in his webpage for FDD https://cryospherecomputing.tk/index.htmlThe source quoted is "Lebedev - 1938". One wonders what research / testing has been on this formula since 1938.
Glen Koehler,I think that the formula given by John_The_Elder in the previous post: "Thickness (cm) = 1.33 * FDD (°C)0.58", is relative to a starting situation without ice. If at the beginning there is already an ice thickness to use the formula you have to add to the FDD the value that gives the thickness already present (and the influence of the thickness in the formula is given by the exponent 0.58).
Here's a link to a Chris Reynolds discussion on ice growth calculations, and another to a post in his "Slow Transition" thread about Lebedev and Billelo and related issues.http://dosbat.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-simplest-model-of-sea-ice-growth.htmlhttps://forum.arctic-sea-ice.net/index.php/topic,933.msg58049.html#msg58049