The linked reference indicates that prior estimate of the SLR rate from 1958 to 2014 of 1.3 +/- 0.1 mm/yr was too low by about 0.2 mm/yr. These values clearly ignore GIA (see below), and they do not emphasize the cumulative impact of the 0.07 mm/sq yr acceleration; which per the University of Colorado gives a SLR rate of 3.4 +/- 0.4 mm/yr value from 1993 thru 2016 (see the first image); and which per the Jason-2 satellite reading give a SLR rate of 4.4 1mm/yr from 2008 thru the end of February 2017 (see the second image):
Thomas Frederikse, Svetlana Jevrejeva, Riccardo E.M. Riva & Sönke Dangendorf (10 November 2017), "A consistent sea-level reconstruction and its budget on basin and global scales over 1958-2014", Journal of Climate,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0502.1http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0502.1?utm_content=buffer005d8&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=bufferAbstract: "Different sea-level reconstructions show a spread in sea-level rise over the last six decades and it is not yet certain whether the sum of contributors explains the reconstructed rise. Possible causes for this spread are, amongst others, vertical land motion at tide-gauge locations and the sparse sampling of the spatially-variable ocean. To assess these open questions, reconstructed sea level and the role of the contributors are investigated on a local, basin, and global scale. High-latitude seas are excluded. Tide-gauge records are combined with observations of vertical land motion, independent estimates of ice-mass loss, terrestrial water storage, and barotropic atmospheric forcing in a self-consistent framework to reconstruct sea-level changes on basin and global scales, which are compared to the estimated sum of contributing processes. For the first time, it is shown that for most basins, the reconstructed sea-level trend and acceleration can be explained by the sum of contributors, as well as a large part of the decadal variability. The sparsely-sampled South Atlantic Ocean forms an exception. The global-mean sea-level reconstruction shows a trend of 1.5±0.2 mm/y over 1958-2014 (1σ), compared to 1.3±0.1 mm/y for the sum of contributors. Over the same period, the reconstruction shows a positive acceleration of 0.07±0.02 mm/y2, which is also in agreement with the sum of contributors, which shows an acceleration of 0.07±0.01 mm/y2. Since 1993, both reconstructed sea level and the sum of contributors show good agreement with altimetry estimates."
Note per the CU Sea Level Research Group at the University of Colorado:
"Glacial isostatic adjustment is comparatively a much shorter-term process (although still measured in thousands of years), and it does have a minor effect on ocean basin size. The current effect has been estimated to be -0.3 mm/yr of equivalent sea level rise due to increasing ocean basin size. This effect is corrected in the satellite altimeter global mean sea level time series and contributes 0.3 mm/yr to the estimated global mean sea level."